| Literature DB >> 27941903 |
Kenneth Mangion1,2, Hao Gao3, Christie McComb1,4, David Carrick2, Guillaume Clerfond1, Xiaodong Zhong5, Xiaoyu Luo3, Caroline E Haig6, Colin Berry1,2.
Abstract
We developed a novel method for tracking myocardial deformation using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine imaging. We hypothesised that circumferential strain using deformation-tracking has comparable diagnostic performance to a validated method (Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes- DENSE) and potentially diagnostically superior to an established cine-strain method (feature-tracking). 81 healthy adults (44.6 ± 17.7 years old, 47% male), without any history of cardiovascular disease, underwent CMR at 1.5 T including cine, DENSE, and late gadolinium enhancement in subjects >45 years. Acquisitions were divided into 6 segments, and global and segmental peak circumferential strain were derived and analysed by age and sex. Peak circumferential strain differed between the 3 groups (DENSE: -19.4 ± 4.8%; deformation-tracking: -16.8 ± 2.4%; feature-tracking: -28.7 ± 4.8%) (ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc, F-value 279.93, p < 0.01). DENSE and deformation-tracking had better reproducibility than feature-tracking. Intra-class correlation co-efficient was >0.90. Larger magnitudes of strain were detected in women using deformation-tracking and DENSE, but not feature-tracking. Compared with a reference method (DENSE), deformation-tracking using cine imaging has similar diagnostic performance for circumferential strain assessment in healthy individuals. Deformation-tracking could potentially obviate the need for bespoke strain sequences, reducing scanning time and is more reproducible than feature-tracking.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27941903 PMCID: PMC5150576 DOI: 10.1038/srep38774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographics of the healthy volunteers (n = 81).
| Demographic | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 44.6 ± 17.7 |
| Sex (Male) n (%) | 39 (48) |
| Height (cm) | 170 ± 9 |
| Weight (kg) | 75.8 ± 15.1 |
| Body mass index, kg m−2 | 26 ± 4 |
| Body surface area (m2) | 1.86 ± 0.21 |
| LVEF (%) | 63.6 ± 5.2 |
| LVEDV index (mL/m2) | 70.1 ± 11.3 |
| LVESV index (mL/m2) | 25.8 ± 6.6 |
| LV mass index (g/m2) | 40.4 ± 9.7 |
| Myocardial segments analysed | 486 |
LVEF: Left ventricle ejection fraction; LVESV: Left ventricle end-diastolic volume; LVESV: Left ventricle end-systolic volume.
*Mean ± standard deviation.
Image quality and artefact scoring.
| Image quality | DENSE (n = 81) | Cine scans (n = 81) |
|---|---|---|
| High quality | 76 (94%) | 81 (100%) |
| Adequate quality | 5 (6%) | 0 (0%) |
| Non-diagnostic | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| motion artefact Number of images with | 2 (2%) | 0 (0%) |
| field effect artefact | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) |
| Segments excluded | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
1High quality: Well defined endo- and epicardial borders at end-systole. No ghosting due to patient breathing. No flow artefact.
2Adequate quality: One or more of the following were present: Slight blurring of endo- and epi-cardial borders at end-systole. Slight artefact due to flow within blood pool but not affecting myocardium. Slight ghosting due to patient breathing.
3Non-diagnostic: One or more of the following are present: Loss of endo- and epi-cardial borders at end-systole; ghosting due to respiration.
Reproducibility of analysis.
| Variable | Mean bias ± SD (%) | 95% Limits of agreement | p-value | ICC | Correlation R | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DENSE-intra | −0.10 ± 0.50 | −1.06 to 0.80 | <0.01 | 0.95 | 0.934 | <0.01 |
| DENSE-inter | 0.05 ± 0.60 | −1.01 to 1.12 | 0.53 | 0.94 | 0.906 | <0.01 |
| Deformation-tracking-intra | −0.07 ± 0.27 | −0.61 to 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.97 | 0.960 | <0.01 |
| Deformation-tracking-inter | −0.11 ± 0.34 | −0.79 to 0.58 | <0.01 | 0.95 | 0.953 | <0.01 |
| Feature-tracking-intra | −0.14 ± 0.89 | −1.92 to 1.64 | 0.49 | 0.97 | 0.978 | <0.01 |
| Feature-tracking-inter | 0.40 ± 1.21 | −2.02 to 2.82 | 0.15 | 0.96 | 0.955 | <0.01 |
ICC: intra-class correlation co-efficient. SD: standard deviation. A sample size of 20 images was taken per variable. The intra-class correlation coefficient is above 0.85 for all of them.
Figure 1Peak circumferential strain assessed in 81 healthy volunteers using deformation-tracking, feature tracking and DENSE.
Outliers are depicted by circles.
Circumferential strain utilising DENSE, deformation-tracking and feature-tracking.
| Parameter Ecc* | DENSE | Deformation-tracking | Feature-Tracking | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (n = 39) | Female (n = 42) | p-value | Male (n = 39) | Female (n = 42) | p-value | Male (n = 39) | Female (n = 42) | p-value | |
| Global (%) | −18.7 ± 2.2 | −20.1 ± 2.7 | 0.014 | −16.0 ± 1.7 | −17.5 ± 2.7 | 0.005 | −28.0 ± 4.8 | −29.2 ± 4.8 | 0.262 |
| Anterior (%) | −20.3 ± 3.5 | −21.6 ± 4.2 | 0.153 | −14.2 ± 3.8 | −16.1 ± 3.8 | 0.053 | −29.6 ± 10.1 | −28.1 ± 8.9 | 0.501 |
| Antero-septal (%) | −18.2 ± 3.7 | −17.9 ± 3.3 | 0.667 | −17.9 ± 3.9 | −20.2 ± 3.8 | 0.009 | −24.8 ± 9.0 | −26.9 ± 12.1 | 0.388 |
| Infero-septal (%) | −16.0 ± 3.6 | −17.4 ± 3.0 | 0.055 | −19.4 ± 3.3 | −20.6 ± 2.1 | 0.179 | −23.2 ± 8.8 | 22.9 ± 11.1 | 0.891 |
| Inferior (%) | −18.5 ± 3.3 | −20.8 ± 3.6 | 0.003 | −15.3 ± 2.2 | −16.4 ± 3.8 | 0.141 | −26.9 ± 6.1 | −24.5 ± 7.6 | 0.139 |
| Infero-lateral (%) | −21.1 ± 2.9 | −22.7 ± 3.7 | 0.030 | −18.9 ± 3.1 | −19.7 ± 3.8 | 0.005 | −26.2 ± 7.6 | −30.9 ± 9.5 | 0.019 |
| Antero-lateral (%) | −20.9 ± 3.2 | −22.3 ± 3.2 | 0.047 | −14.0 ± 3.2 | −14.7 ± 3.1 | 0.501 | −22.5 ± 9.0 | 026.0 ± 7.7 | 0.72 |
Mean (±Standard deviation); Ecc: Circumferential strain.
Significance of relationship of strain with age and sex at 1.5 T.
| Ecc | DENSE | Deformation-tracking | Feature-tracking |
|---|---|---|---|
| P value for regression | 0.046 | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| Co-efficient for age | −0.005 (−0.036, 0.025) | −0.029 (−0.054, −0.004) | −0.100 (−0.155, −0.450) |
| P value for age | 0.733 | 0.059 | 0.001 |
| Co-efficient for sex | 1.370 (0.277, 2.463) | −0.029 (−0.054, −0.004) | 0.994 (−0.761, 3.197) |
| P value for sex | 0.015 | 0.006 | 0.224 |
Ecc: Circumferential strain.
Figure 2Cine-strain estimation with in-house developed tissue deformation-tracking software.
Schematic illustration of deforming a target image to a reference image using a b-spline deformable registration method. Myocardial strain is calculated from the estimated deformation fields. The similarity measurement is defined as the sum of squared differences in pixel intensity between the two images, the deformation transformation between the target and the reference images is modeled with uniform cubic b-splines.
Typical MRI imaging parameters at 1.5 T.
| TR (ms) | 3.3 |
| TE (ms) | 1.2 |
| FoV (mm) | 340 |
| Flip Angle (degree) | 80 |
| Slice Thickness (mm) | 7 |
| Resolution (mm) | 180 × 256 |
| Bandwidth (Hz/pixel) | 930 |
| TR (ms) | 32.5 |
| TE (ms) | 7.97 |
| FOV (mm) | 360 |
| Voxel size (mm) | 3.2 × 3.2 × 8 |
| Flip angle (degree) | 20 |
| Bandwidth (Hz/pixel) | 1207 |
| Displacement Encoding Frequency (π/mm) | 0.2 |
| Triggers per breathold | 8 |
| EPI factor | 8 |
| segments per cardiac frame | 16 |
| Shimming method | automatic |
TR: repetition time (ms); TE: echo time (ms); FoV: field of view (mm).