| Literature DB >> 27941714 |
Hongjun Guo1, Dongya Zhang1, Qingrui Fu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to explore the mechanism by which cervical cancer is inhibited by promoting IGFBP7 expression using ellagic acid from pomegranate peel extract. MATERIAL AND METHODS HeLa cells were divided into 6 groups: control group (NC), blank control group (BL), and IGFBP7 overexpression group (IGFBP7), and 2.5 uM, 5. 0 uM, and 10.0 uM ellagic acid-treated groups. The cell proliferation ability was detected and the degree of invasion in the 6 groups was measured by Transwell assay. The expression levels of IGFBP7 and AKT/mTOR in the 6 groups of cells were detected by RT-PCR technique. RESULTS Compared with NC and BL groups, The IGFBP7 gene expressions of the IGFPB7 and ellagic acid-treated groups were significantly increased (P<0.05). There was a dose-effect dependence in the ellagic acid-treated groups. The invasion ability of the IGFBP7 group and ellagic acid-treated groups was significantly lower than that of NC and BL groups in HeLa cells (P<0.05). The apoptosis rate of the IGFBP7 group and ellagic acid-treated groups was significantly higher than that of the NC and BL groups in HeLa cells (P<0.05). AKT and mTOR mRNA and protein expressions of the IGFBP7 group and ellagic acid-treated groups were significantly lower than that of the NC and BL groups (P<0.05). There was a dose-effect dependence in the ellagic acid-treated groups. CONCLUSIONS The ellagic acid in pomegranate peel extract can inhibit the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway by enhancing the expression level of IGFBP7, which can inhibit the HeLa cells in cervical cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27941714 PMCID: PMC5158133 DOI: 10.12659/msm.898658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Hela cell invasion of 6 groups (χ̄±s).
| Group | n | Cell transmission rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| NC group | 5 | 97.56±6.43 |
| BL group | 5 | 95.41±5.44 |
| IGFBP7 group | 5 | 57.31±8.71 |
| 2.5 uM group | 5 | 76.43±7.59 |
| 5.0 uM group | 5 | 65.54±8.16 |
| 10.0 uM group | 5 | 56.44±8.11 |
P<0.05, Compared with NC group;
P<0.05, Compared with BL group;
P<0.05, Compared with 2.5 uM group;
P<0.05, Compared with 5.0 uM group.
Figure 1The apoptosis in the 6 groups. (A) The apoptosis in the NC group. (B) The apoptosis in the BL group. (C) The apoptosis in the 2.5 uM group. (D) The apoptosis in the 5.0 uM group. (E) The apoptosis in the 10.0 uM group. (F) The apoptosis in the IGFBP7 group. (G) Differences in apoptosis among the 6 groups.
Figure 2The gene and protein expression of IGFBP7 in the 6 groups (fold-change).
Figure 3The gene and protein expression of AKT in the 6 groups (fold-change).
Figure 4The gene and protein expression of mTOR in the 6 groups (fold-change).