Literature DB >> 27939856

An assessment of domain-general metacognitive responding in rhesus monkeys.

Emily Kathryn Brown1, Victoria L Templer2, Robert R Hampton3.   

Abstract

Metacognition is the ability to monitor and control one's cognition. Monitoring may involve either public cues or introspection of private cognitive states. We tested rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a series of generalization tests to determine which type of cues control metacognition. In Experiment 1, monkeys learned a perceptual discrimination in which a "decline-test" response allowed them to avoid tests and receive a guaranteed small reward. Monkeys declined more difficult than easy tests. In Experiments 2-4, we evaluated whether monkeys generalized this metacognitive responding to new perceptual tests. Monkeys showed a trend toward generalization in Experiments 2 & 3, and reliable generalization in Experiment 4. In Experiments 5 & 6, we presented the decline-test response in a delayed matching-to-sample task. Memory tests differed from perceptual tests in that the appearance of the test display could not control metacognitive responding. In Experiment 6, monkeys made prospective metamemory judgments before seeing the tests. Generalization across perceptual tests with different visual properties and mixed generalization from perceptual to memory tests provide provisional evidence that domain-general, private cues controlled metacognition in some monkeys. We observed individual differences in generalization, suggesting that monkeys differ in use of public and private metacognitive cues.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Metacognition; Monitoring; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27939856      PMCID: PMC6404529          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  11 in total

1.  Dissociation of memory signals for metamemory in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Benjamin M Basile; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Rats know when they remember: transfer of metacognitive responding across odor-based delayed match-to-sample tests.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Keith A Lee; Aidan J Preston
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Slow Progress with the Most Widely Used Animal Model: Ten Years of Metacognition Research in Rats, 2009-2019.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer
Journal:  Anim Behav Cogn       Date:  2019-11

4.  Are monkeys sensitive to informativeness: An experimental study with baboons (Papio papio).

Authors:  Anne Reboul; Olivier Mascaro; Nicolas Claidière; Joël Fagot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Explicit memory and cognition in monkeys.

Authors:  Robert R Hampton; Jonathan W M Engelberg; Ryan J Brady
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) monitor evolving decisions to control adaptive information seeking.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.899

7.  Rhesus monkeys metacognitively monitor memories of the order of events.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Emily Kathryn Brown; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats.

Authors:  Keith A Lee; Aidan J Preston; Taylor B Wise; Victoria L Templer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Subjective decision threshold for accurate visual detection performance in rats.

Authors:  Yuma Osako; Yoshio Sakurai; Junya Hirokawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes.

Authors:  Bonnie M Perdue; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.