Literature DB >> 27939667

A review of odour impact criteria in selected countries around the world.

Marlon Brancher1, K David Griffiths2, Davide Franco3, Henrique de Melo Lisboa3.   

Abstract

Exposure to environmental odour can result in annoyance, health effects and depreciation of property values. Therefore, many jurisdictions classify odour as an atmospheric pollutant and regulate emissions and/or impacts from odour generating activities at a national, state or municipal level. In this work, a critical review of odour regulations in selected jurisdictions of 28 countries is presented. Individual approaches were identified as: comparing ambient air odour concentration and individual chemicals statistics against impact criteria (maximum impact standard); using fixed and variable separation distances (separation distance standard); maximum emission rate for mixtures of odorants and individual chemical species (maximum emission standard); number of complaints received or annoyance level determined via community surveys (maximum annoyance standard); and requiring use of best available technologies (BAT) to minimize odour emissions (technology standard). The comparison of model-predicted odour concentration statistics against odour impact criteria (OIC) is identified as one of the most common tools used by regulators to evaluate the risk of odour impacts in planning stage assessments and is also used to inform assessment of odour impacts of existing facilities. Special emphasis is given to summarizing OIC (concentration percentile and threshold) and the manner in which they are applied. The way short term odour peak to model time-step mean (peak-to-mean) effects is also captured. Furthermore, the fundamentals of odorant properties, dimensions of nuisance odour, odour sampling and analysis methods and dispersion modelling guidance are provided. Common elements of mature and effective odour regulation frameworks are identified and an integrated multi-tool strategy is recommended.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Criteria; Dispersion modelling; Odour; Regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27939667     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  12 in total

1.  Concentration Fluctuations from Localized Atmospheric Releases.

Authors:  Massimo Cassiani; Matteo B Bertagni; Massimo Marro; Pietro Salizzoni
Journal:  Boundary Layer Meteorol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.949

2.  Odor Control in the Cannabis Industry: Lessons from the New Kid on the Block.

Authors:  Nate Seltenrich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 11.035

3.  Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus.

Authors:  Stephan Stöckel; Jens Cordes; Benno Stoffels; Dominik Wildanger
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Technologies for deodorization of malodorous gases.

Authors:  Izabela Wysocka; Jacek Gębicki; Jacek Namieśnik
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  VOC Removal Performance of a Joint Process Coupling Biofiltration and Membrane-Filtration Treating Food Industry Waste Gas.

Authors:  Krystyna Lelicińska-Serafin; Anna Rolewicz-Kalińska; Piotr Manczarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Determination of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from a commercial dairy farm with an exercise yard and the health-related impact for residents.

Authors:  Chuandong Wu; Fan Yang; Marlon Brancher; Jiemin Liu; Chen Qu; Martin Piringer; Günther Schauberger
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Instrumental Odour Monitoring System Classification Performance Optimization by Analysis of Different Pattern-Recognition and Feature Extraction Techniques.

Authors:  Tiziano Zarra; Mark Gino K Galang; Florencio C Ballesteros; Vincenzo Belgiorno; Vincenzo Naddeo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-27       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Combining Ordinary Kriging with wind directions to identify sources of industrial odors in Portland, Oregon.

Authors:  Ted C Eckmann; Samantha G Wright; Logan K Simpson; Joe L Walker; Steven A Kolmes; James E Houck; Sandra C Velasquez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pattern Recognition and Anomaly Detection by Self-Organizing Maps in a Multi Month E-nose Survey at an Industrial Site.

Authors:  Sabina Licen; Alessia Di Gilio; Jolanda Palmisani; Stefania Petraccone; Gianluigi de Gennaro; Pierluigi Barbieri
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Qualitative Exploration of the 'Rolling Unmasking Effect' for Downwind Odor Dispersion from a Model Animal Source.

Authors:  Donald W Wright; Jacek A Koziel; David B Parker; Anna Iwasinska; Thomas G Hartman; Paula Kolvig; Landon Wahe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.