Literature DB >> 20943281

Assessment of different surveillance systems for avian influenza in commercial poultry in Catalonia (North-Eastern Spain).

A Alba1, J Casal, S Napp, P A J Martin.   

Abstract

Compulsory surveillance programmes for avian influenza (AI) have been implemented in domestic poultry and wild birds in all the European Member States since 2005. The implementation of these programmes is complex and requires a close evaluation. A good indicator to assess their efficacy is the sensitivity (Se) of the surveillance system. In this study, the sensitivities for different sampling designs proposed by the Spanish authorities for the commercial poultry population of Catalonia were assessed, using the scenario tree model methodology. These samplings were stratified throughout the territory of Spain and took into account the species, the types of production and their specific risks. The probabilities of detecting infection at different prevalences at both individual and holding level were estimated. Furthermore, those subpopulations that contributed more to the Se of the system were identified. The model estimated that all the designs met the requirements of the European Commission. The probability of detecting AI circulating in Catalonian poultry did not change significantly when the within-holding design prevalence varied from 30% to 10%. In contrast, when the among-holding design prevalence decreased from 5% to 1%, the probability of detecting AI was drastically reduced. The sampling of duck and goose holdings, and to a lesser extent the sampling of turkey and game bird holdings, increased the Se substantially. The Se of passive surveillance in chickens for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) and low pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) were also assessed. The probability of the infected birds manifesting apparent clinical signs and the awareness of veterinarians and farmers had great influence on the probability of detecting AI. In order to increase the probability of an early detection of HPAI in chicken, the probability of performing AI specific tests when AI is suspected would need to be increased.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20943281     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating surveillance strategies for the early detection of low pathogenicity avian influenza infections.

Authors:  Arianna Comin; Arjan Stegeman; Stefano Marangon; Don Klinkenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Contribution of Meat Inspection to the surveillance of poultry health and welfare in the European Union.

Authors:  A Huneau-Salaün; K D C Stärk; A Mateus; C Lupo; A Lindberg; S LE Bouquin-Leneveu
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Active animal health surveillance in European Union Member States: gaps and opportunities.

Authors:  B Bisdorff; B Schauer; N Taylor; V Rodríguez-Prieto; A Comin; A Brouwer; F Dórea; J Drewe; L Hoinville; A Lindberg; M Martinez Avilés; B Martínez-López; M Peyre; J Pinto Ferreira; J Rushton; G VAN Schaik; K D C Stärk; C Staubach; M Vicente-Rubiano; G Witteveen; D Pfeiffer; B Häsler
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Detection of HPAI H5N1 viruses in ducks sampled from live bird markets in Vietnam.

Authors:  M Q Phan; W Henry; C B Bui; D H DO; N V Hoang; N T Thu; T T Nguyen; T D LE; T Q Diep; K Inui; J Weaver; J Carrique-Mas
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 5.  Systematic review of surveillance systems and methods for early detection of exotic, new and re-emerging diseases in animal populations.

Authors:  V Rodríguez-Prieto; M Vicente-Rubiano; A Sánchez-Matamoros; C Rubio-Guerri; M Melero; B Martínez-López; M Martínez-Avilés; L Hoinville; T Vergne; A Comin; B Schauer; F Dórea; D U Pfeiffer; J M Sánchez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Modelling the species jump: towards assessing the risk of human infection from novel avian influenzas.

Authors:  A A Hill; T Dewé; R Kosmider; S Von Dobschuetz; O Munoz; A Hanna; A Fusaro; M De Nardi; W Howard; K Stevens; L Kelly; A Havelaar; K Stärk
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Optimizing the precision of case fatality ratio estimates under the surveillance pyramid approach.

Authors:  Camille Pelat; Neil M Ferguson; Peter J White; Carrie Reed; Lyn Finelli; Simon Cauchemez; Christophe Fraser
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Sensitivity of Bovine Tuberculosis Surveillance in Wildlife in France: A Scenario Tree Approach.

Authors:  Julie Rivière; Yann Le Strat; Barbara Dufour; Pascal Hendrikx
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessment of the Current Surveillance System for Human Leptospirosis in Ecuador by Decision Analytic Modeling.

Authors:  María Laura Calero; Gustavo Monti
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.