Literature DB >> 27936163

Origin and Evolution of Allopolyploid Wheatgrass Elymus fibrosus (Schrenk) Tzvelev (Poaceae: Triticeae) Reveals the Effect of Its Origination on Genetic Diversity.

De-Chuan Wu1, Deng-Min He1, Hai-Lan Gu1, Pan-Pan Wu1, Xu Yi1, Wei-Jie Wang1, Han-Feng Shi1, De-Xiang Wu1, Genlou Sun1,2.   

Abstract

Origin and evolution of tetraploid Elymus fibrosus (Schrenk) Tzvelev were characterized using low-copy nuclear gene Rpb2 (the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II), and chloroplast region trnL-trnF (spacer between the tRNA Leu (UAA) gene and the tRNA-Phe (GAA) gene). Ten accessions of E. fibrosus along with 19 Elymus species with StH genomic constitution and diploid species in the tribe Triticeae were analyzed. Chloroplast trnL-trnF sequence data suggested that Pseudoroegneria (St genome) was the maternal donor of E. fibrosus. Rpb2 data confirmed the presence of StH genomes in E. fibrosus, and suggested that St and H genomes in E. fibrosus each is more likely originated from single gene pool. Single origin of E. fibrosus might be one of the reasons causing genetic diversity in E. fibrosus lower than those in E. caninus and E. trachycaulus, which have similar ecological preferences and breeding systems with E. fibrosus, and each was originated from multiple sources. Convergent evolution of St and H copy Rpb2 sequences in some accessions of E. fibrosus might have occurred during the evolutionary history of this allotetraploid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27936163      PMCID: PMC5147983          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The tribe Triticeae includes not only the world’s most economically important cereal crops and forage grasses, but also troublesome weeds distributed all over the world. Within this tribe, three quarters of the species are polyploids [1]. Elymus L. as delimited by Löve [2] is the largest genus with exclusively allopolyploids including approximately 150 species. Due to the abundance of polyploid species in Elymus and closely related diploid species from various taxa in Triticeae available, Elymus is an ideal model for examining the impact of polyploidization on speciation, and the role of alloployploidy as a driver of plant diversification [3]. Cytogenetically, five basic genomes (St, H, Y, P, and W) (genome symbols follow Wang et al., [4]) have been assigned to the species in this genus [5, 6]. The majorities of species are tetraploids and characterized by having either StH or the StY genomic combination. For StH genome species, the St genome was suggested maternally donated by Pseudoroegneria (Nevski) Á. Löve [7-13]. The H genome was derived from Hordeum L. The StH genome Elymus species have adapted to an enormously wide range of climates and habitats, making them of special interest for speciation and ecological research [3]. Elymus fibrosus (Schrenk) Tzvel. is one of StH genome species with a predominantly self-pollinating, distributed in Russia and northern Scandinavia [14]. It grows on wet meadows, riverside sand and pebbles, and among shrubs. It is usually found growing alone or sympatrically with E. caninus, E. sibiricus L., and E. repens (L.) Gould. It has been reported low genetic variation and deficiency in heterozygosity in E. fibrosus population, which might be caused by a potential bottleneck [15, 16]. Phylogenetic analyses have demonstrated multiple origins of the H and St haplome in the StH tetraploid species of Elymus [17-22] and reticulate evolution in the Elymus [17, 18, 20–22]. The studies on genetic diversity of E. caninus [23, 24], E. fibrosus [15, 16], E. alaskanus [25-28], and E. trachycaulus complex [29, 30] have shown that despite some of these four species having similar ecological preferences and breeding systems, their population structure and genetic variation deviated highly, and each species possesses a unique pattern of genetic variation. Multiple origins are often considered as a potential source for increasing genetic variation in polyploids [31]. Our previous studies have shown multiple origins of allopolyploid wheatgrass E. caninus [21] and E. trachycaulus [22]. Elymus fibrosus is a tetraploid containing genomes of a Pseudoroegneria species (St genome) and a wild Hordeum species (H genome) [1], but its origin was rarely explored at molecular level. In this study, single copy nuclear gene, the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Rpb2), and chloroplast DNA TrnL–trnF region (spacer between the tRNA-Leu (UAA) gene and the tRNA-Phe (GAA) gene) were used to explore the origin of tetraploid E. fibrosus. The effect of origination on genetic diversity of this species was discussed.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and DNA extraction

DNA from ten accessions of E. fibrosus species was extracted from fresh young leaf tissues using the method of Junghans and Metzlaff [32], and amplified using low copy nuclear gene Rpb2 and chloroplast TrnL-F sequences. Rpb2 and TrnL-F sequences from 19 Elymus StH genome species and some diploid Triticeae species representing the St, H, I, Xa, Xu, W, P, E and V genomes included in the analyses were downloaded from GenBank (NCBI) or obtained from the published data [17, 21, 33]. Accession number, genomic constitution, geographical origin, and GenBank identification number of these materials are listed in Table 1. The voucher specimens of E. fibrosus were deposited at Anhui Agricultural University.
Table 1

Taxa from Bromus, Aegilops, Eremopyrum, Heteranthelium, Psathyrostachys, Secale, Taeniatherum, Agropyron, Australopyrum, Dasypyrum, Thinopyrum, Pseudoroegneria, Hordeum and Elymus used in this study, their origin, accession number and GenBank sequence number.

SpeciesAccession No.GenomeOriginRPB2TrnL/F
B. sterilis L.PI 229595IranHQ231839
B. tectorum L.NA-AB732928
Aegilops sharonensis Eig.PI584396S1IsraelEU013659
Aegilops speltoides TauschMorrison s.n.SNA-AF519112
Eremopyrum bonaepartis (Spreng.) NevskiH5554FNA-AF519148
Eremopyrum orientale (L.) Jaub. & SpachH 5555FNA-AF519151
Heteranthelium piliferum (Banks & Sol.) Hochst.PI 402352QIran-AF519153
Henrardia persica (Boiss.) C.E.Hubb.AF519152
Psathyrostachys juncea (Fischer) NevskiPI206684NsTurkey-AF519170
Psathyrostachys fragilis (Boiss.) NevskiAF519169
Secale cereale L.Kellogg s.n.RNA-AF519162
Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) NevskiMB-106-41-79TaNA-AF519164
Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn.PI 383534PKars, TurkeyEU187438-
AF519115
Ag. mongolicum KengD2774PNA-AF519117
Aust. retrofractum (Vickery) Á. LöveCrane 86146WNA-AF519118
Aust. retrofractum (Vickery) Á. LövePI 533014WNew South Wales, AustraliaEU187482
PI 547363WNew South Wales, AustraliaEU187470
Dasypyrum villosum (L.) CandargyPI251478VTurkey-AF519128
Thinopyrum elongatum (Host) D.R.DeweyPI 142012EeRussia FederationEU187439-
Thinopyrum elongatum (Host) D.R.DeweyPI531719EeFrance-AF519166
Thinopyrum bessarabicum (Savul. & Rayss) Á.LövePI531711EbEstonia-AF519165
Thinopyrum bessarabicum (Savul. & Rayss) Á. LövePI 531712EbEstoniaEU187474
Thinopyrum intermedium (Host.) Barkworth & D.R. DeweyDQ912410
H. vulgare L.HT025INA-AJ969295
H. spontaneum K. KochHT025INA-AJ969296
H. bulbosum L.PI 440417INA-AF519122
H. marinum HudsPI 304346XaCalifornia, USA-AF519124
H. marinum subsp. gussoneanum (Parlatore) ThellungXaNA-AB732935
H. murinum L.PI 247054XuCalifornia, USA-AF519125
H. muticum J. PreslHT043HNA-AJ969330
H. pusillum Nutt.HNA-AB732937
H2024HU.S.A+
H. comosum J. PreslHT060HNA-AJ969362
H. euclaston Steud.H2148HUruguay+
H. intercedens NevskiH1941HU.S.A+
H. pubiflorum Hook. fHT075HNA-FM163499
H. bogdanii WilenskyH4014HNA+
H. bogdanii WilenskyPI531761HChina-AY740789
H. roshevitzii BowdenHT005HNA-AJ969271
H9152HNA+-
H. chilense Roem. and Schult.HT053HNA-AJ969351
H1816HChile+
H. patagonicum (Haumann) CovasHT046HNA-AJ969336
H. brachyantherum subsp. californicum (Covas & Stebbins) Bothmer et al.HNA-KF600706
H. brachyantherum NevskiHNA-AJ969314
P. libanotica (Hack.) D. R. DeweyPI 228391StIran-AF519156
PI 228390StNA+
P. spicata (Pursh) Á. LövePI 610986StUtah, United States-AF519158
PI 537379StNA+
PI 516184StNA+
D2839StNA-AF519160
P. stipifolia (Czern. ex Nevski) Á. LövePI 440095StRussian Federation+EU617255
P. strigosa (M. Bieb.) Á. LövePI 531752StEstoniaHQ231850EU617284
PI 499637StChina-EU617269
PI531753StEstonia-EU617283
P. gracillima (Nevski) Á.LövePI 440000StStavropol, Russian Federation-EU617289
P. tauri (Boiss. & Balansa) Á. LövePI 401326StNA+
Elymus alaskanus (Scribn. & Merr.) Á. LöveH10476StHNA+
Elymus Canadensis L.AF519133
PI 531576StHNA+
Elymus caninus (L.) L.StHNAKF600685
H3169StHNAEF596700
Elymus dentatus (Hook. f.) TzvelevDQ159290
PI 628702StHNAEF596744,EF596769
Elymus elymoides (Raf.) SwezeyAF519135
Elymus confusus (Roshev.) TzvelevW6 21505StHNA+
Elymus glaucus BuckleyAF519138
PI 232258StHNAEF596757
Elymus hystrix L.AF519139
H5495StHNAEF596765
Elymus lanceolatus (Scribn. & J. G. Sm.) GouldAF519140
PI 236663StHNAEF596739
Elymus mutabilis (Drobow) TzvelevDQ159291
Elymus virescens PiperH10584StHNAEF596742,EF596766
Elymus virginicus L.StHNAAF519145
PI 436946StHNAEF596759
Elymus wiegandii FernaldPI 531708StHNAEF596740,EF596758
Elymus sibiricus L.KF905221
PI 499461StHNAEF596741,EF596763
Elymus scabriglumis (Hack.) Á. LövePI 331168StHHNAEF596756
Elymus trachycaulus (Link) Gould ex ShinnersPI372500StHNorthwest Territory, Canada-AF519141
Elymus trachycaulus (Link) Gould ex ShinnersH3526StHNerungri, RussiaEF596743,EF596764
E. transbaicalensis (Nevski) TzvelevH10391StHSiberia, RussiaEF596762,EF596745
Elymus wawawaiensis Ined.StHNAAF519147
PI 506262StHNAEU187441
Elymus firbrosus (Schrenk) TzvelevPI439999StHRussian Federation+, ++
PI 345585StHFormer Soviet Union++
PI 564930StHRussian Federation+,++
PI564933StHKazakhstan+, ++
PI 598465StHRussian Federation+, ++
PI 406467StHFormer Soviet Union+, ++
PI 531609StHGermany+,++
PI 406448StHFormer Soviet Union+, ++
PI 564932StHRussian Federation+, ++
H10339StHPelkosniemi, FinlandEF596773-

NA: information not available

+: sequence present

-: sequence absent

NA: information not available +: sequence present -: sequence absent

DNA amplification and sequencing

The single and low copy nuclear gene Rpb2 and cpDNA gene TrnL-F sequences were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers P6F and P6FR [33], and TrnL and TrnF [9], respectively. The sequences of Rpb2 and TrnL-F region were amplified in a 20 μl reaction containing 20 ng template DNA, 0.25 mM dNTP, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.25 μM of each primer and 2.0 U Taq polymerase (TransGen, Beijing, China). The amplification profiles for the Rpb2 gene and TrnL-F were described in Zuo et al. [22]. PCR products were purified using the EasyPure Quick Gel Extraction Kit (TransGen, Beijing, China) according to manufacturer’s instruction. The amplified PCR products of Rpb2 gene were cloned into the pGEM-easy T vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis., USA), and transformed into E. coli competent cell DH5α according to the manufacturer’s instruction (TransGen, Beijing, China). At least 10 clones from each accession were screened and sequenced. Both the PCR products and positive colonies were commercially sequenced by the Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering & Technology Service Ltd (Shanghai, China). Each PCR product amplified by cpDNA primer TrnL-F was independently amplified twice in order to avoid any error which would be induced by Taq DNA polymerase during PCR amplification, since Taq error that cause substitution is mainly random and it is unlikely that any two sequences would share identical Taq errors to create a false synapomorphy.

Data analysis

The chromatograph of each automated sequence was visually checked. Multiple sequences were aligned using Clustal X [34] with default parameters, and additional manual editing to minimize gaps using GeneDoc program. Maximum-parsimony (MP) analysis was performed using the computer program PAUP ver. 4 beta 10 [35]. All characters were specified as unweighted and unordered, and gaps were not included in the analysis. A heuristic search using the Tree Bisection-Reconnection (TBR) option with MulTrees on, and ten replications of random addition sequences with the stepwise addition option were used to generate most-parsimonious trees. A strict consensus tree was generated from the obtained multiple parsimonious trees. Overall character congruence was estimated by the consistency index (CI), and the retention index (RI). The robustness of clades was inferred using bootstrap values calculated with 1000 replications [36]. In addition to maximum parsimony analysis, Bayesian analysis was also performed. Models of sequence evolution were tested for each data set using PhyML 3.0 program [37]. The general time-reversible (GTR) [38] substitution model led to a largest ML score for both Rpb2 and TrnL-F compared to the other 7 substitution models (JC69, K80, F81, F84, HKY85, TN93 and custom), and was chosen in the Bayesian analysis using MrBayes 3.1 [39]. MrBayes 3.1 was run with the program’s standard setting of two analyses in parallel, each with four chains, and estimates convergence of results by calculating standard deviation of split frequencies between analyses. When 571,000 generations for Rpb2 data and 1,788,000 generations for TrnL-F were reached, the standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. Samples were taken every 1000 generations under the GTR model with gamma-distributed rate variation across sites and a proportion of invariable sites. The first 25% of samples from each run were discarded as burn-in to ensure the stationarity of the chains. Bayesian posterior probability (PP) values were calculated from a majority rule consensus tree generated from the remaining sampled trees.

Result

Rpb2 sequence and phylogeny analysis

The amplified patterns from tetraploid E. fibrosus species showed two bands with sizes of approximately 900 bp and 1000 bp, respectively, which corresponded well with previous report by Sun et al. [17]. Extensive sequence variations were detected between the sequences from the St and H genomes. Sequence alignment with the St, H, W and E genomic species indicated that the 900 bp and 1000 bp amplified in tetraploid E. fibrosus corresponded to the size of sequences from H and St genome, respectively. A total of 58 sequences were used for phylogenetic analysis, which included 18 sequences from 10 accessions of E. fibrosus, 22 sequences from 16 other Elymus species with StH genome, and 17 sequences from diploid species in the tribe Triticeae with H, E, P, St and W genomes, and one sequence from Bromus sterilis that was used as an outgroup. Total of 732 characters were used for phylogenetic analysis, including 385 constant, 122 parsimony uninformative and 225 parsimony informative characters. Maximum parsimony analysis of these 58 Rpb2 sequences generated 544 equally most parsimonious trees with CI = 0.807 and RI = 0.929. The separated Bayesian analyses using GTR model resulted in identical trees with arithmetic mean log-likelihood values of -4011.69 and -4014.63. The tree topology generated by Bayesian analyses using the GTR model is similar to those generated by maximum parsimony. Consensus strict tree generated from maximum parsimonious trees with Bayesian PP and maximum parsimony bootstrap (1000 replicates) value is shown in Fig 1.
Fig 1

Strict consensus tree generated from 544 parsimonious trees based on Rpb2 sequence data which was conducted using heuristic search with TBR branch swapping.

Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values from MP and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) values, respectively. Bromus sterilis was used as an outgroup. Consistency index (CI) = 0.807, retention index (RI) = 0.929.

Strict consensus tree generated from 544 parsimonious trees based on Rpb2 sequence data which was conducted using heuristic search with TBR branch swapping.

Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values from MP and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) values, respectively. Bromus sterilis was used as an outgroup. Consistency index (CI) = 0.807, retention index (RI) = 0.929. Two distinct copies of sequences were obtained for 8 out of 10 tetraploid E. fibrosus accessions that were amplified and sequenced (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis well separated the two copies of sequences from each accession into two different clades, one in the H genome clade, another in the St genome clade with exception of two sequences from the accession PI 564933 (Fig 1). Of two copies of sequences from accession PI 564933 recovered, one was grouped into the H clade in 93% bootstrap support and 1.00 PP, another was sister to the H clade in 89% bootstrap support and 1.00 PP (Fig 1). Only one copy of sequence each from accession H10339 and PI 345585 was recovered. The sequences from the accession H10339 was placed into the H clade, while the sequence from PI 345585 was grouped into the St clade. Within the St clade, all sequences from E. fibrosus were grouped together with the sequences from E. canadensis, E. confusus, E. trachycaulus, E. transbaicalensis and E. wawawaiensis in a support of 0.64 PP. The sequences from other species formed a subclade in 89% bootstrap and 0.99 PP support, included in which are the sequences from diploid St genome species and tetraploid E. dentatus, E. sibiricus, E. virescens and E. wiegandii. Within the H clade, all sequences of E. fibrosus accessions except the one from accession PI 406448 were placed together in 55% bootstrap and 0.97 PP support. The sequences from E. caninus and E. dentatus are sister to the E. fibrosus group in 67% bootstrap support and 0.95 PP.

TrnL-F analysis

Maximum parsimonious analysis of 63 TrnL-F sequences was performed using B. tectorum as an outgroup. Total of 838 characters were used for phylogenetic analysis, of which 739 were constant, and 42 were parsimony informative. Maximum parsimonious analysis generated 124 most parsimonious trees with a CI = 0.903 (excluding uninformative characters) and RI = 0.951. The Bayesian analyses using GTR model resulted in identical trees with arithmetic mean log-likelihood values of -2232.85 and -2235.11. One of the maximum parsimonious tree is shown in Fig 2 with BS values from maximum parsimonious analysis and PP value from Bayesian analysis.
Fig 2

One of the 124 parsimonious trees derived from TrnL-F sequence data was conducted using heuristic search with TBR branch swapping.

Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values from MP and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) values, respectively. Bromus tectorum was used as an outgroup. Consistency index (CI) = 0.903, retention index (RI) = 0.951.

One of the 124 parsimonious trees derived from TrnL-F sequence data was conducted using heuristic search with TBR branch swapping.

Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values from MP and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) values, respectively. Bromus tectorum was used as an outgroup. Consistency index (CI) = 0.903, retention index (RI) = 0.951. The phylogenetic tree showed several obvious groups. All sequences from Hordeum species were grouped together with the sequences from Psathyrostachys. The sequences from H genome were well separated from the sequences from St genome species. All sequences from E. fibrosus were grouped together with diploid Pseudoroegneria species (St genome), Dasypyrum villosum (V). The sequences also included in this group were from tetraploid Elymus species and Thinopyrum intermedium.

Discussion

Cytologically, Elymus fibrosus was considered as a tetraploid containing the genomes of a Pseudoroegneria species (St genome) and a wild Hordeum species (H genome) [1]. The phylogenetic analysis based on TrnL-F data here grouped all sequences from E. fibrosus with the sequences from diploid Pseudoroegneria species (St genome), Dasypyrum villosum (V), other Elymus species and Thinopyrum intermedium together (Fig 2). This grouping is not exceptional. A study using combined cpDNA restriction sites, rpoA sequences, and tRNA spacer sequences also grouped several North American Elymus species with Pseudoroegneria (St) and Dasypyrum (V) [9]. It has been suggested maternal genome of Elymus species might be donated by three possible donors: Pseudoroegneria, Dasypyrum or Thinopyrum [40]. The study on the genomic constitution and evolution of Thinopyrum intermedium using TrnL-F placed the sequences from Pseudoroegneria (St), Dasypyrum (V) and Thinopyrum intermedium in a clade [41]. Our phylogenetic analysis of E. trachycaulus (StH) also grouped the TrnL-F sequences from E. trachycaulus with the sequences from Pseudoroegneria (St), Dasypyrum (V) and Thinopyrum (E) together [22]. cpDNA data on diploid species in Triticeae revealed a close relationship among Pseudoroegneria (St), Dasypyrum (V) and Thinopyrum (E) [42]. The TrnL-F sequence from Thinopyrum intermedium chloroplast that was placed in this clade (Fig 2) was downloaded from Mahelka et al. [43], and was from the St genome since Th. intermedium is hexaploid species with the St genome donated by Pseudoroegneria (St) [41]. The chloroplast sequences from Hordeum species were well separated from the sequences from E. fibrosus (Fig 2). The presence of Pseudoroegneria-derived chloroplast sequences is consistent with the nuclear gene Rpb2 sequence data, in which the two distinct copies of Rpb2 sequences from each E. fibrosus were well separated into Pseudoroegneria and Hordeum clades (Fig 1). Taking all into consideration, we suggested Pseudoroegneria as the likeliest maternal progenitor of E. fibrosus. It was documented that Pseudoroegneria (St) was the maternal parent of polypoids containing the St nuclear genome in combination with other genomes [7], which has been reported in numerous studies [8–13, 21]. However, a study also suggested that not only Pseudoroegneria (St) but also Agropyron (P) are the likely maternal genome donors to Kengyilia (StYP) species [44]. The Pseudoroegneria as the likeliest maternal progenitor of E. fibrosus should be verified by additional chloroplast sequences. Two distinct copies of Rpb2 sequences each from 8 out of ten accessions of E. fibrosus were discovered. Phylogenetic analysis well separated the two distinct copies of sequences from each accession into St and H clades except the two distinct copies of sequences from the accession PI 564933, confirming that seven accessions (PI 439999, PI 564930, PI 598465, PI 406467, PI 531609, PI 406448, and PI 564932) of E. fibrosus have the StH genomic constitution, and supporting the cytological evidence on the genomic constitution of this species [1]. However, one copy from the accession PI 564933 was placed into the H clade, while another copy is sister to the H clade in phylogenetic analysis (Fig 1). This is unexpected, but has also been reported in other Elymus species. In E. trachycaulus species, two/three H-like Pepc sequences from some accessions were obtained without St copy sequence from these accessions. Phylogenetic analysis clearly separated the two distinct copies of sequences from each accession into H1 and H2 clades [22]. In some accessions of StStHH allotetraploids E. lanceolatus and E. wawawaiensis, each has two different copies of sequences from the St genome, including one P. spicata–like sequence and another P. strigosa–like sequence [18]. As what has been discussed in Zuo et al [22], gene introgression from Hordeum into E. fibrosus following polyploidization; incomplete concerted evolution which incompletely homogenized St copy of Rpb2 toward second H copy of Rpb2, and concerted evolution even it is very common for highly repetitive nuclear sequences [45, 46] could occur for some low-copy nuclear genes, are the more likely reasons causing two distinct H-like copies of sequences present in the accession PI 564933 of allotetraploid E. fibrosus. It cannot be excluded that homoeologous rearrangements in Brassica napus [47, 48] and exchange among homoeologous chromosomes [49] might promote convergent evolution after polyploidization, which could result in two original distinct copies of sequences similar to each other. Only one copy of sequence each from accession H10339 and PI 345585 was recovered. If no bias in cloning or PCR amplification, there is 99.9% chance of obtaining at least one copy of each of the two ancestral allelic types for the allotetraploid [50]. This might be due to mutation in the primers region causing failure of amplification of the “missing” gene copy. Another possibility might be genome convergent evolution in allopolyploids as discussed above.Allozyme, RAPD and microsatellite studies on E. fibrosus indicated that although there are differences in the amount of genetic diversity detected by allozyme, RAPD and microsatellite analyses, this species possesses a very low amount of genetic variation in its populations [15, 16]. However, E. caninus, E. alaskanus, and E. trachycaulus with StH genomic constitution have similar ecological preferences and breeding systems with E. fibrosus, genetic diversity of E. caninus [23, 24], E. alaskanus [25-28], and E. trachycaulus complex [29, 30] showed much higher level than that in E. fibrosus. Genetic diversity within plant species is complex results of many factors such as abiotic ecological forces, biotic agents, and species characteristics including population size, breeding system, migration and dispersal [51, 52]. Multiple origins are often considered as one of potential sources for increasing genetic variation in polyploids [31]. Our previous studies have shown that St genome in E. caninus has two distinct origins from either St and/or St, and that P. spicata and P. stipifolia are the most likely donors of the St genome copies. The sequences data also indicated multiple origins of the H genome in E. caninus [21]. Zou et al. [22] indicated that the St genome in E. trachycaulus was originated from either P. strigosa, P. stipifolia, P. spicata or P. geniculate, and that the H genome in E. trachycaulus was contributed by multiple sources. However, phylogenetic analysis of Rpb2 sequences here revealed that all St copies of sequences from E. fibrosus were grouped together, and all H copy sequences of E. fibrosus accessions except the accession PI 406448 were also placed together, suggesting that St and H genome in E. fibrosus each was more likely originated from single gene pool, which might be one of the reasons causing genetic diversity in E. fibrosus lower than those in E. caninus and E. trachycaulus.

RPB2 sequences used in phylogenetic analysis.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

TrnL–trnF sequences used for phylogenetic analysis.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  27 in total

1.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools.

Authors:  J D Thompson; T J Gibson; F Plewniak; F Jeanmougin; D G Higgins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A simple and rapid method for the preparation of total plant DNA.

Authors:  H Junghans; M Metzlaff
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  Pairing and recombination at meiosis of Brassica rapa (AA) x Brassica napus (AACC) hybrids.

Authors:  M Leflon; F Eber; J C Letanneur; L Chelysheva; O Coriton; V Huteau; C D Ryder; G Barker; E Jenczewski; A M Chèvre
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Origin of the H genome in StH-genomic Elymus species based on the single-copy nuclear gene DMC1.

Authors:  Genlou Sun; Xiaodi Zhang
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.166

5.  Detection of chromosomal rearrangements derived from homologous recombination in four mapping populations of Brassica napus L.

Authors:  Joshua A Udall; Pablo A Quijada; Thomas C Osborn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype.

Authors:  Robert T Gaeta; J Chris Pires; Federico Iniguez-Luy; Enrique Leon; Thomas C Osborn
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  A unique recent origin of the allotetraploid species Arabidopsis suecica: Evidence from nuclear DNA markers.

Authors:  Mattias Jakobsson; Jenny Hagenblad; Simon Tavaré; Torbjörn Säll; Christer Halldén; Christina Lind-Halldén; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Microsatellite variability and heterozygote deficiency in the arctic-alpine Alaskan wheatgrass (Elymus alaskanus) complex.

Authors:  Genlou Sun; Björn Salomon
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.166

9.  Genome constitution of the Australian hexaploid grass Elymus scabrus (Poaceae: Triticeae).

Authors:  J Torabinejad; R J Mueller
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.166

10.  Origin and Reticulate Evolutionary Process of Wheatgrass Elymus trachycaulus (Triticeae: Poaceae).

Authors:  Hongwei Zuo; Panpan Wu; Dexiang Wu; Genlou Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.