Literature DB >> 2793611

Are seismic communication signals transmitted by bone conduction in the blind mole rat?

R Rado1, M Himelfarb, B Arensburg, J Terkel, Z Wollberg.   

Abstract

The anatomy of the middle ear of the blind mole rat, a subterranean rodent that uses seismic signals for long distance communication, is described qualitatively and quantitatively. The ossicular chain is of the parallel type with a lever arms ratio of 0.55 and an effective areal ratio of stapedial footplate to eardrum of 0.09. Assuming an ideal mechanical transform, the calculated fraction of acoustical energy theoretically transmitted to the cochlea, indicate low efficiency for airborne sounds. This is in accordance with the relatively high electrophysiological and behavioral threshold, shown previously. We suggest that a unique morphology of the middle ear and of the articulation between the lower jaw and the skull, as well as a peculiar 'jaw listening behavior' enable seismic vibrations to be transmitted to the inner ear mainly by bone conduction, thereby compensating for the limitation in receiving airborne signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2793611     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90175-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Seismic communication in a blind subterranean mammal: a major somatosensory mechanism in adaptive evolution underground.

Authors:  E Nevo; G Heth; H Pratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  How do animals use substrate-borne vibrations as an information source?

Authors:  Peggy S M Hill
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-07-11

Review 3.  Structure and function of the mammalian middle ear. II: Inferring function from structure.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Ossicular differentiation of airborne and seismic stimuli in the Cape golden mole (Chrysochloris asiatica).

Authors:  U B Willi; G N Bronner; P M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Alone, in the dark: The extraordinary neuroethology of the solitary blind mole rat.

Authors:  Yael Kashash; Grace Smarsh; Noga Zilkha; Yossi Yovel; Tali Kimchi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Sound and vibration sensitivity of VIIIth nerve fibers in the frogs Leptodactylus albilabris and Rana pipiens pipiens.

Authors:  J Christensen-Dalsgaard; P M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Response properties of auditory activated cells in the occipital cortex of the blind mole rat: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  R S Sadka; Z Wollberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Ear morphology in two root-rat species (genus Tachyoryctes) differing in the degree of fossoriality.

Authors:  Lucie Pleštilová; Ema Hrouzková; Hynek Burda; Yonas Meheretu; Radim Šumbera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Ear Structures of the Naked Mole-Rat, Heterocephalus glaber, and Its Relatives (Rodentia: Bathyergidae).

Authors:  Matthew J Mason; Hannah L Cornwall; Ewan St J Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.