Literature DB >> 33956210

Ear morphology in two root-rat species (genus Tachyoryctes) differing in the degree of fossoriality.

Lucie Pleštilová1, Ema Hrouzková2, Hynek Burda3, Yonas Meheretu4, Radim Šumbera2.   

Abstract

It is supposed that the subterranean lifestyle in mammals is reflected in ear morphology and tuning of hearing to low frequencies. We studied two root-rat species to see if their ear morphology reflects the difference in the amount of their surface activity. Whereas the more subterranean Tachyoryctes splendens possesses shorter pinnae as expected, it has smaller bullae compared to the more epigeic Tachyoryctes macrocephalus. The ratio between the eardrum and the stapedial footplate area and the ratio between the mallear and the incudal lever were lower in T. splendens (19.3 ± 0.3 and 1.9 ± 0.0, respectively) than in T. macrocephalus (21.8 ± 0.6 and 2.1 ± 0.1), probably reflecting the latter's higher surface activity. The cochlea in both species has 3.5 coils, yet the basilar membrane is longer in the smaller T. splendens (13.0 ± 0.5 versus 11.4 ± 0.7 mm), which indicates its wider hearing range and/or higher sensitivity (to some frequencies). In both root-rat species, the highest density of outer hair cells (OHC) was in the apical part of the cochlea, while the highest density of inner hair cells (IHC) was in its middle part. This OHC density pattern corresponds with good low-frequency hearing, whereas the IHC pattern suggests sensitivity to higher frequencies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ear morphology; Hearing; Spalacidae; Subterranean mammals; Tachyoryctes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33956210     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-021-01489-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  27 in total

1.  The ear in subterranean insectivora and rodentia in comparison with ground-dwelling representatives. I. Sound conducting system of the middle ear.

Authors:  H Burda; V Bruns; G C Hickman
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.804

2.  Correlations between auditory structures and hearing sensitivity in non-human primates.

Authors:  Mark N Coleman; Matthew W Colbert
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.804

Review 3.  Form and function of the mammalian inner ear.

Authors:  Eric G Ekdale
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Convergence vs. Specialization in the ear region of moles (Mammalia).

Authors:  Nick Crumpton; Nikolay Kardjilov; Robert J Asher
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  Acoustic communication and burrow acoustics are reflected in the ear morphology of the coruro (Spalacopus cyanus, Octodontidae), a social fossorial rodent.

Authors:  Sabine Begall; Hynek Burda
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.804

6.  Inner ear structure and electrophysiological audiograms of the subterranean mole rat, Spalax ehrenbergi.

Authors:  V Bruns; M Müller; W Hofer; G Heth; E Nevo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Qualitative assessment of postnatal maturation of the organ of Corti in two rat strains.

Authors:  H Burda
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Middle ear and cochlear receptors in the subterranean mole-rat, Spalax ehrenbergi.

Authors:  H Burda; V Bruns; E Nevo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cochlea in old world mice and rats (Muridae).

Authors:  H Burda; L Ballast; V Bruns
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.804

10.  Audiograms of three subterranean rodent species (genus Fukomys) determined by auditory brainstem responses reveal extremely poor high-frequency hearing.

Authors:  Patricia Gerhardt; Yoshiyuki Henning; Sabine Begall; E Pascal Malkemper
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.