| Literature DB >> 27936063 |
Dominik Sammer1, Katrin Krause1, Matthias Gube1, Katharina Wagner1, Erika Kothe1.
Abstract
Hydrophobins-secreted small cysteine-rich, amphipathic proteins-foster interactions of fungal hyphae with hydrophobic surfaces, and are involved in the formation of aerial hyphae. Phylogenetic analyses of Tricholoma vaccinum hydrophobins showed a grouping with hydrophobins of other ectomycorrhizal fungi, which might be a result of co-evolution. Further analyses indicate angiosperms as likely host trees for the last common ancestor of the genus Tricholoma. The nine hydrophobin genes in the T. vaccinum genome were investigated to infer their individual roles in different stages of the life cycle, host interaction, asexual and sexual development, and with respect to different stresses. In aerial mycelium, hyd8 was up-regulated. In silico analysis predicted three packing arrangements, i.e., ring-like, plus-like and sheet-like structure for Hyd8; the first two may assemble to rodlets of hydrophobin covering aerial hyphae, whereas the third is expected to be involved in forming a two-dimensional network of hydrophobins. Metal stress induced hydrophobin gene hyd5. In early steps of mycorrhization, induction of hyd4 and hyd5 by plant root exudates and root volatiles could be shown, followed by hyd5 up-regulation during formation of mantle, Hartig' net, and rhizomorphs with concomitant repression of hyd8 and hyd9. During fruiting body formation, mainly hyd3, but also hyd8 were induced. Host preference between the compatible host Picea abies and the low compatibility host Pinus sylvestris could be linked to a stronger induction of hyd4 and hyd5 by the preferred host and a stronger repression of hyd8, whereas the repression of hyd9 was comparable between the two hosts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27936063 PMCID: PMC5147985 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167773
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
General characteristics of the identified T. vaccinum hydrophobins.
| Cysteine motif | Potential N- and O-linked glycosylation sites [ | |
|---|---|---|
| X9-C-X6-C-C-X32-C-X13-C-X5-C-C-X12-C-X5 | N: no glycosylation; O: S1 | |
| X9-C-X6-C-C-X32-C-X12-C-X5-C-C-X12-C-X5 | N: no glycosylation; O: T1, T6, S7, (T44, T49) | |
| X12-C-X6-C-C-X32-C-X17-C-X5-C-C-X12-C-X7 | N: N28; O: T3, (T15, T22, S23, T30, T48) | |
| X14-C-X6-C-C-X32-C-X18-C-X5-C-C-X12-C-X8 | N: no glycosylation; O: T1, T3, S11, (T21, T26, T50, T51, T60, S61) | |
| X11-C-X6-C-C-X32-C-X13-C-X5-C-C-X12-C-X5 | N: N78; O: T1, S8, S9, (T51) | |
| X9-C-X6-C-C-X32-C-X13-C-X5-C-C-X12-C-X5 | N: no glycosylation; O: S1, S5 | |
| X42-C-X6-C-C-X31-C-X12-C-X5-C-C-X12-C-X5 | N: no glycosylation; O: S1, T5, T24, S32, S35, S37, (T55) | |
| X14-C-X6-C-C-X32-C-X18-C-X5-C-C-X12-C-X8 | N: no glycosylation; O: S6, T10, S11, T13, (T21, S42, T50, T51, T57, T60) | |
| X13-C-X6-C-C-X32-C-X18-C-X5-C-C-X12-C-X8 | N: N26, N82; O: S41, T49, T50, T59, S60 |
Fig 1Gene and genomic structure of hydrophobins in T. vaccinum.
(A) The exons of hydrophobin genes are visualized by arrows; the asterisk shows the position of the 5th cysteine residue within a splice site. (B) The genomic structure is presented for the scaffolds of T. vaccinum genome.
Fig 2Consensus phylogram of hydrophobins from genus Tricholoma.
Gene sequences conceptually translated and protein sequences were used from T. albobrunneum (Ta), T. imbricatum (Ti), T. fracticum (Tfr), T. fulvum (Tf), T. imbricatum (Ti), T. matsutake (Tm), T. terreum (Tt), T. ustaloides (Tu), T. vaccinum (Tv), and fruiting body (Fb). Bayesian posterior probability values are shown above corresponding branches; branch lengths are proportional to evolutionary distances. The class II hydrophobin PbHyd2 from the ascomycete Paracoccidioides brasiliensis has been included as outgroup.
Fig 3Regulatory motifs of mycorrhiza specific genes.
Predictions were obtained from MEME suite and TOMTOM analysis.
Fig 4Fold changes of relative expression of hydrophobin transcripts.
(A) Mycelium grown on soil (substrate mycelium), immersed and floating mycelium compared to solid medium. (B) Liquid culture treated with root exudates of P. abies or P. sylvestris, and (C) with ethanol (EtOH) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) both compared with non-treated liquid culture. (D) Response to volatiles from mycelia grown on solid medium, next to roots of P. abies or P. sylvestris, and (E) in ectomycorrhiza with P. abies or P. sylvestris both compared to a control on solid medium. (F) Fruiting bodies compared to artificial medium and soil. Bars denote standard error, significance level * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.005.
Fig 5Predictions of possible assembly of six Hyd8 proteins showing the six proteins, amino acids coloured depending on properties and a located/postulated structure.
Beside the six proteins in different colours, amino acids coloured depending on properties: yellow—hydrophobic, dark yellow—amphipathic, orange—polar, red—negatively charged, brown—positively charged. (A) A ring structure with 7 nm in diameter similar to HGFI from Grifola frondosa [17], (B) a plus-like structure which results in a 15 nm diameter if four plus structures are combined and (C) packing arrangement to a sheet-like layer such as HFBII from Trichoderma reesei [21].
Fig 6Relative expression levels of hydrophobin transcripts in mycelium treated with metals for 24 hours in liquid culture.
Bars denote standard error. All values are fold changes compared to a control in liquid medium; significance level * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.005.
Fig 7Summary of differentially expressed hydrophobins in life cycle of T. vaccinum.