| Literature DB >> 27936009 |
Young Bin Kim1, Nuri Park2, Qimeng Zhang1, Jun Gi Kim3, Shin Jin Kang3, Chang Hun Kim2.
Abstract
This paper proposes a system for predicting increases in virtual world user actions. The virtual world user population is a very important aspect of these worlds; however, methods for predicting fluctuations in these populations have not been well documented. Therefore, we attempt to predict changes in virtual world user populations with deep learning, using easily accessible online data, including formal datasets from Google Trends, Wikipedia, and online communities, as well as informal datasets collected from online forums. We use the proposed system to analyze the user population of EVE Online, one of the largest virtual worlds.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27936009 PMCID: PMC5147861 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1System overview.
Summary of crawled data
| Source | Boundary | Data Volume |
|---|---|---|
| EVE Online Community | Sep. 12, 2011–Apr. 29, 2016 | 1,156,608 User Replies |
| 37,418 User Threads | ||
| Google Trends (EVE Online) | Sep. 12, 2011–Apr. 29, 2016 | 1,692 Google Trends Values (1 value per day) |
| Wikipedia Usage (EVE Online) | Sep. 12, 2011–Apr. 29, 2016 | 1,692 Wikipedia Usage Values (1 value per day) |
EVE Online Forum Opinion Analysis Example
| Opinion Criteria | Example topic sentences |
|---|---|
| Very Positive | “Pretty happy with Crucible” / “Happy New Year from CCP Games!” / “The days of "Erotica 1" are gone and I AM GLAD” / “Great job CCP!” |
| Positive | “Nice launcher” / “Better Missile graphics are good” / “CCP Thank you for new Capital Rats” |
| Neutral | “Guide to Fleet Commanding” / “Drone ships completely useless especially for new players.” / “A New Player Guide” / “Worth coming back to eve?” |
| Negative | “Why does Something Awful forums looks so old and terrible?” / “Back to play this terrible game terribly” / “Server crashed?” / “Awful download speed since launcher is released.” |
| Very Negative | “Those WTF moments” / “AFK Cloaking in System is a Terrible Mechanic” / “Verification Failure—Still Happening” / “Eve Installer not working” |
Fig 2Z-scores of fluctuations in population and results of opinion analysis.
Some opinions show a trend similar to that of fluctuations in the population.
Pearson Correlation Coefficient Result
| Opinion | Pearson Correlation Coefficient between results of opinion analysis and the population |
|---|---|
| Very Negative Topic | 0.2547 |
| Negative Topic | 0.2422 |
| Neutral Topic | 0.2136 |
| Positive Topic | 0.2784 |
| Very Positive Topic | |
| Very Negative Reply | |
| Negative Reply | |
| Neutral Reply | |
| Positive Reply | |
| Very Positive Reply |
Example of a deep learning dataset.
The z-score for data from the previous 20 days was used as the values A–J, which indicate the value of the sum of forum opinion on a given date. V–Z denote formal data values (number of topics, sum of replies, sum of views, Google Trends value, and Wikipedia page views) on a given date.
| Data Class | Date | Opinion Data | Formal Data | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very positiveTopic | PositiveTopic | NeutralTopic | NegativeTopic | Very negativeTopic | Very positiveReply | PositiveReply | NeutralReply | NegativeReply | Very negativeReply | Number of Topics | Sum of Replies | Sum of Views | Google Trends Value | Wikipedia Page Views | ||
| Crawled Raw Data | Apr 02, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
| Input Learning Data | Apr 02, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Experimental results of predicted fluctuations in the EVE Online user population
| Data Set | Accuracy (%) | F1-Score | MCC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hidden Layers | Learning Days | |||
| 1 Hidden Layer | 3 Days | 65.68% | 0.6577 | 0.3098 |
| 5 Days | 72.04% | 0.7199 | 0.4342 | |
| 7 Days | 75.15% | 0.753 | 0.5145 | |
| 9 Days | 79.88% | 0.8006 | 0.6042 | |
| 12 Days | 80.06% | 0.8027 | 0.6027 | |
| 2 Hidden Layers | 3 Days | 69.23% | 0.6933 | 0.3815 |
| 5 Days | 72.78% | 0.7271 | 0.4495 | |
| 7 Days | ||||
| 9 Days | 78.70% | 0.788 | 0.5802 | |
| 12 Days | 81.55% | 0.8147 | 0.6127 | |
| 3 Hidden Layers | 3 Days | 68.94% | 0.6895 | 0.3756 |
| 5 Days | 62.13% | 0.6213 | 0.2283 | |
| 7 Days | 73.96% | 0.74 | 0.4822 | |
| 9 Days | 77.52% | 0.7763 | 0.5438 | |
| 12 Days | 79.76% | 0.7988 | 0.5981 | |
| 5 Hidden Layers | 3 Days | 68.34% | 0.6844 | 0.3572 |
| 5 Days | 70.41% | 0.7040 | 0.4078 | |
| 7 Days | 75.15% | 0.7521 | 0.4987 | |
| 9 Days | 76.63% | 0.768 | 0.5344 | |
| 12 Days | 77.23% | 0.7732 | 0.536 | |
| 7 Hidden Layers | 3 Days | 69.23% | 0.6935 | 0.408 |
| 5 Days | 73.37% | 0.7337 | 0.4675 | |
| 7 Days | 84.62% | 0.8468 | 0.6897 | |
| 9 Days | 75.74% | 0.7578 | 0.5079 | |
| 12 Days | 77.38% | 0.7751 | 0.5386 | |
Fig 3Experimental results.
Values by data and layers used.