Literature DB >> 27935640

The basis function approach for modeling autocorrelation in ecological data.

Trevor J Hefley1,2, Kristin M Broms1, Brian M Brost1, Frances E Buderman1, Shannon L Kay2, Henry R Scharf2, John R Tipton2, Perry J Williams1,2, Mevin B Hooten1,2,3.   

Abstract

Analyzing ecological data often requires modeling the autocorrelation created by spatial and temporal processes. Many seemingly disparate statistical methods used to account for autocorrelation can be expressed as regression models that include basis functions. Basis functions also enable ecologists to modify a wide range of existing ecological models in order to account for autocorrelation, which can improve inference and predictive accuracy. Furthermore, understanding the properties of basis functions is essential for evaluating the fit of spatial or time-series models, detecting a hidden form of collinearity, and analyzing large data sets. We present important concepts and properties related to basis functions and illustrate several tools and techniques ecologists can use when modeling autocorrelation in ecological data.
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.

Keywords:  Bayesian model; autocorrelation; collinearity; dimension reduction; semiparametric regression; spatial statistics; time series

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27935640     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  8 in total

1.  What processes must we understand to forecast regional-scale population dynamics?

Authors:  Jesse R Lasky; Mevin B Hooten; Peter B Adler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  spind: an R Package to Account for Spatial Autocorrelation in the Analysis of Lattice Data.

Authors:  Gudrun Carl; Sam C Levin; Ingolf Kühn
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-02-28

3.  Time-varying predatory behavior is primary predictor of fine-scale movement of wildland-urban cougars.

Authors:  Frances E Buderman; Mevin B Hooten; Mathew W Alldredge; Ephraim M Hanks; Jacob S Ivan
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.600

4.  Rabies Surveillance Identifies Potential Risk Corridors and Enables Management Evaluation.

Authors:  Amy J Davis; Kathleen M Nelson; Jordona D Kirby; Ryan Wallace; Xiaoyue Ma; Kim M Pepin; Richard B Chipman; Amy T Gilbert
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Smoothing splines of apex predator movement: Functional modeling strategies for exploring animal behavior and social interactions.

Authors:  Andrew B Whetten
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Assessing vegetation recovery from energy development using a dynamic reference approach.

Authors:  Adrian P Monroe; Travis W Nauman; Cameron L Aldridge; Michael S O'Donnell; Michael C Duniway; Brian S Cade; Daniel J Manier; Patrick J Anderson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Evaluating Bayesian spatial methods for modelling species distributions with clumped and restricted occurrence data.

Authors:  David W Redding; Tim C D Lucas; Tim M Blackburn; Kate E Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Population Dynamics of Bank Voles Predicts Human Puumala Hantavirus Risk.

Authors:  Hussein Khalil; Frauke Ecke; Magnus Evander; Göran Bucht; Birger Hörnfeldt
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.184

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.