Literature DB >> 27935606

Structural and functional assessment of macula to diagnose glaucoma.

H L Rao1,2, R S M Hussain1, M Januwada1, L N Pillutla1, V U Begum1, A Chaitanya1, S Senthil1, C S Garudadri1.   

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the diagnostic abilities of structural (ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT)) and functional (visual sensitivities measured using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and microperimetry (MP)) assessments of macula in glaucoma.MethodsIn a prospective study, 46 control eyes (28 subjects) and 61 glaucoma eyes (46 patients) underwent visual sensitivity estimation at macula (central 10°) by SAP and MP, and GCIPL thickness measurement at macula by SDOCT. Glaucoma was diagnosed by experts based on the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer changes. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUC) curves and sensitivities at 95% specificity were used to assess the diagnostic ability of visual sensitivity and GCIPL measurements at various macular sectors.ResultsAUCs of GCIPL parameters ranged between 0.58 and 0.79. AUCs of SAP and MP sensitivities ranged between 0.59 and 0.71, and 0.59 and 0.72, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the AUCs of corresponding sector measurements (P>0.10 for all comparisons). Sensitivities at 95% specificities ranged from 31-59% for GCIPL parameters, 16-34% for SAP, and 8-38% for MP parameters. Sensitivities were significantly better with GCIPL compared with SAP and MP parameters in diagnosing glaucoma. Inferotemporal, inferior, and superotemporal sector measurements of GCIPL and visual sensitivity showed the best abilities to diagnose glaucoma.ConclusionsComparing the diagnostic abilities of structural and functional tests at macula in glaucoma, GCIPL thickness measurements with SDOCT performed better than the visual sensitivity measurements by SAP and MP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27935606      PMCID: PMC5396001          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  28 in total

1.  Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis.

Authors:  R J Glynn; B Rosner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-03

2.  The length of Henle fibers in the human retina and a model of ganglion receptive field density in the visual field.

Authors:  Neville Drasdo; C Leigh Millican; Charles R Katholi; Christine A Curcio
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A comparison among Humphrey field analyzer, Microperimetry, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in the evaluation of macula in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Faruk Oztürk; Güliz Fatma Yavas; Tuncay Küsbeci; Sitki Samet Ermis
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparison of functional and morphological diagnostics in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.

Authors:  M K J Klamann; A Grünert; A-K B Maier; J Gonnermann; A M Joussen; K K Huber
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Topographic profiles of retinal nerve fiber layer defects affect the diagnostic performance of macular scans in preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Mi Jeung Kim; Jin Wook Jeoung; Ki Ho Park; Yun Jeong Choi; Dong Myung Kim
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Microperimetry of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects.

Authors:  N Orzalesi; S Miglior; C Lonati; L Rosetti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography for detection of early glaucoma and comparison to retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Sara Nowroozizadeh; Nariman Nassiri; Nila Cirineo; Shane Knipping; Joann Giaconi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Correlation between the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured with cirrus HD-OCT and macular visual field sensitivity measured with microperimetry.

Authors:  Shino Sato; Kazuyuki Hirooka; Tetsuya Baba; Kaori Tenkumo; Eri Nitta; Fumio Shiraga
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.

Authors:  V C Lima; T S Prata; C G V De Moraes; J Kim; W Seiple; R B Rosen; J M Liebmann; R Ritch
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness of high definition optical coherence tomography in perimetric and preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Viquar U Begum; Uday K Addepalli; Ravi K Yadav; Kalmuri Shankar; Sirisha Senthil; Chandra S Garudadri; Harsha L Rao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  5 in total

1.  Microperimetry and optical coherence tomography imaging in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral focal ischaemic glaucoma.

Authors:  Imran H Yusuf; Jasleen K Jolly; Gokulan Ratnarajan; John F Salmon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Nima Fatehi; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Ji Woong Lee; Farideh Sharifipour; Ramin Daneshvar; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Circumpapillary structure-function relationships with microperimetry and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in glaucoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kita; Gábor Holló; Akiko Murai; Ritsuko Kita; Tsunehiro Saito; Akito Hirakata
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-06

4.  Functional evaluation of the macular area in early glaucoma using microperimetry.

Authors:  Swati Phuljhele; Dewang Angmo; Lalit Aalok; Sandeep Parwal; Raj Vardhan Azad; Viney Gupta; Ramanjit Sihota
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  A Comparison Among Microperimetry, Standard Automated Perimetry and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of the Macula in Glaucoma Eyes with Hemifield Defects.

Authors:  Tian Tian; Yu Cai; Mei Li; Yuan Fang; Yingzi Pan
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-11-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.