Literature DB >> 27934278

Gridded National Inventory of U.S. Methane Emissions.

Joannes D Maasakkers1, Daniel J Jacob1, Melissa P Sulprizio1, Alexander J Turner1, Melissa Weitz2, Tom Wirth2, Cate Hight2, Mark DeFigueiredo2, Mausami Desai2, Rachel Schmeltz2, Leif Hockstad2, Anthony A Bloom3, Kevin W Bowman3, Seongeun Jeong4, Marc L Fischer4.   

Abstract

We present a gridded inventory of US anthropogenic methane emissions with 0.1° × 0.1° spatial resolution, monthly temporal resolution, and detailed scale-dependent error characterization. The inventory is designed to be consistent with the 2016 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks (GHGI) for 2012. The EPA inventory is available only as national totals for different source types. We use a wide range of databases at the state, county, local, and point source level to disaggregate the inventory and allocate the spatial and temporal distribution of emissions for individual source types. Results show large differences with the EDGAR v4.2 global gridded inventory commonly used as a priori estimate in inversions of atmospheric methane observations. We derive grid-dependent error statistics for individual source types from comparison with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) regional inventory for Northeast Texas. These error statistics are independently verified by comparison with the California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Measurement (CALGEM) grid-resolved emission inventory. Our gridded, time-resolved inventory provides an improved basis for inversion of atmospheric methane observations to estimate US methane emissions and interpret the results in terms of the underlying processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27934278     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

Review 1.  Reflecting on progress since the 2005 NARSTO emissions inventory report.

Authors:  Melissa Day; George Pouliot; Sherri Hunt; Kirk R Baker; Megan Beardsley; Gregory Frost; David Mobley; Heather Simon; Barron B Henderson; Tiffany Yelverton; Venkatesh Rao
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Satellite observations reveal extreme methane leakage from a natural gas well blowout.

Authors:  Sudhanshu Pandey; Ritesh Gautam; Sander Houweling; Hugo Denier van der Gon; Pankaj Sadavarte; Tobias Borsdorff; Otto Hasekamp; Jochen Landgraf; Paul Tol; Tim van Kempen; Ruud Hoogeveen; Richard van Hees; Steven P Hamburg; Joannes D Maasakkers; Ilse Aben
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hydrocarbon Tracers Suggest Methane Emissions from Fossil Sources Occur Predominately Before Gas Processing and That Petroleum Plays Are a Significant Source.

Authors:  Ariana L Tribby; Justin S Bois; Stephen A Montzka; Elliot L Atlas; Isaac Vimont; Xin Lan; Pieter P Tans; James W Elkins; Donald R Blake; Paul O Wennberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 11.357

4.  Wintertime CO2, CH4, and CO Emissions Estimation for the Washington, DC-Baltimore Metropolitan Area Using an Inverse Modeling Technique.

Authors:  Israel Lopez-Coto; Xinrong Ren; Olivia E Salmon; Anna Karion; Paul B Shepson; Russell R Dickerson; Ariel Stein; Kuldeep Prasad; James R Whetstone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Zachary R Barkley; Adam R Brandt; Kenneth J Davis; Scott C Herndon; Daniel J Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A Kort; Brian K Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D Maasakkers; Anthony J Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W Pacala; Jeff Peischl; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C Wofsy; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Methane emissions from the Marcellus Shale in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia based on airborne measurements.

Authors:  Xinrong Ren; Dolly L Hall; Timothy Vinciguerra; Sarah E Benish; Phillip R Stratton; Doyeon Ahn; Jonathan R Hansford; Mark D Cohen; Sayantan Sahu; Hao He; Courtney Grimes; Ross J Salawitch; Sheryl H Ehrman; Russell R Dickerson
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.261

7.  Intercomparison of atmospheric trace gas dispersion models: Barnett Shale case study.

Authors:  Anna Karion; Thomas Lauvaux; Israel Lopez Coto; Colm Sweeney; Kimberly Mueller; Sharon Gourdji; Wayne Angevine; Zachary Barkley; Aijun Deng; Arlyn Andrews; Ariel Stein; James Whetstone
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 6.133

8.  Large Fugitive Methane Emissions From Urban Centers Along the U.S. East Coast.

Authors:  Genevieve Plant; Eric A Kort; Cody Floerchinger; Alexander Gvakharia; Isaac Vimont; Colm Sweeney
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.720

9.  Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin.

Authors:  Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate; Luis Guanter; Yin-Nian Liu; Daniel J Varon; Joannes D Maasakkers; Yuzhong Zhang; Apisada Chulakadabba; Steven C Wofsy; Andrew K Thorpe; Riley M Duren; Christian Frankenberg; David R Lyon; Benjamin Hmiel; Daniel H Cusworth; Yongguang Zhang; Karl Segl; Javier Gorroño; Elena Sánchez-García; Melissa P Sulprizio; Kaiqin Cao; Haijian Zhu; Jian Liang; Xun Li; Ilse Aben; Daniel J Jacob
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Majority of US urban natural gas emissions unaccounted for in inventories.

Authors:  Maryann R Sargent; Cody Floerchinger; Kathryn McKain; John Budney; Elaine W Gottlieb; Lucy R Hutyra; Joseph Rudek; Steven C Wofsy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.