Literature DB >> 27932442

Contraceptive sales in the setting of the Zika virus epidemic.

Luis Bahamondes1, Moazzam Ali2, Ilza Monteiro3, Arlete Fernandes3.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Has there been any influence of the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak on the sales of contraceptive methods in Brazil? SUMMARY ANSWER: Contraceptive sales in the 24 months of evaluation showed little variation and no significant change has been observed since the ZIKV outbreak. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Transmission of ZIKV is primarily by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes; however, sexual transmission has also been described. The association of several birth defects and the ZIKV infection during pregnancy has been established, and it was estimated in Bahia, Brazil that the infection rate could range from 10% to 80%. The World Health Organisation (WHO) declared the cluster of microcephaly cases and other neurological disorders a health emergency on 1 February 2016. The Brazilian government also made recommendations for women who were planning to become pregnant and who reside in ZIKV-affected areas to reconsider or postpone pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The objective of this study was to assess the sales of contraceptive methods in Brazil, tracking it from before and through the ZIKV outbreak. We obtained information from all pharmaceutical companies based in Brazil and from the manufacturers of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including the copper-intrauterine device (IUD), the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and implants, about contraceptives sales in the public and private sectors between September 2014 and August 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: We analyzed the data for: (i) oral contraceptives, i.e. combined oral contraceptives (COC) and progestin-only pills (POP), and vaginal and transdermal contraceptives, (ii) injectable contraceptives, i.e. once-a-month and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, (iii) LARCs and (iv) emergency contraceptive (EC) pills. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Monthly sales of COC, POP, patches and vaginal rings represent the major sales segment of the market, i.e. 12.7-13.8 million cycles/units per month (90%). The second largest group of sales was injectables, representing 0.8-1.5 million ampoules per month (9.5%). Following this, are LARC methods with sales of 37 000-41 000 devices per month (0.5%). It is important to note that although the peak months of sales were different for each group of contraceptives, there were no significant differences overall between the months of observation. The EC pill sales were between 1.0 million and 1.3 million of pills per month. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the use of contraceptive methods was already high and no change was noted, the ZIKV outbreak may have changed the pregnancy intentions of Brazilian women. Consequently, the number of women planning pregnancy may be lower than that recorded. The contraceptive sales figures did not include condoms. Since condoms might not only prevent pregnancies, but also sexual transmission of ZIKV, this lack of information is a limitation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The results from this assessment showed that the sales of contraceptives presented little variation during the ZIKV outbreak in Brazil. Furthermore, it is possible that access to LARC methods was limited. Although we did not investigate the reason for low LARC uptake, we suspect that it is due to lack of availability of LARC in the public sector, the high cost of the methods and the incomplete insurance coverage on contraception for women. Projections estimate millions of additional cases of ZIKV transmission. Thus, a coordinated response is needed to ensure access to a wide range of contraceptive methods for women during the ZIKV outbreak. In conclusion, this assessment of contraceptive sales in Brazil identifies challenges in contraceptive access, especially for LARC methods, and represents an alternative source of data to help us understand the trends in demand for contraception in ZIKV-affected areas. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study received partial financial support from Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) award # 2015/20504-9 and from an anonymous donor. The funding sources did not play a role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors declare no conflict of interest associated with this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brazil; Zika virus; contraception; long-acting contraceptive methods; unintended pregnancies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27932442      PMCID: PMC5165082          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


Introduction

Zika virus (ZIKV) is a flavivirus and the transmission is primarily by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes; however, perinatal transmission, transfusion transmission and sexual transmission have also been described (Hayes, 2009; Besnard ; Musso ; Davidson ). The association of birth defects and the ZIKV infection during pregnancy is clear, but the magnitude of the risk is not fully understood (Rasmussen ). Some studies have also described association of ZIKV with fetal deaths, in-utero growth restriction with or without microcephaly, ventricular calcifications and other central nervous system (CNS) lesions (Musso ; Brasil ; Cauchemez ; Mlakar ). Sexual transmission of ZIKV has also been reported in some studies (Musso ; Brooks ; Davidson ; D'Ortenzio ; US-CDC, 2016a). Furthermore, up to 80% of ZIKV infections are asymptomatic, which poses difficulties for couples trying to become pregnant and avoid ZIKV (Brasil, MOH, 2016a). World Health Organisation (WHO) declared the cluster of microcephaly cases and other neurological disorders a health emergency on 1 February 2016 (WHO, 2016a). Consequently, the Brazilian and other Latin American (LA) governments declared national emergencies and made recommendations for women who are planning to become pregnant and who reside in ZIKV-affected areas to reconsider or postpone pregnancy. Furthermore, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US-CDC, 2016b) also recommended that women and their partners should discuss pregnancy planning, even if they have no symptoms, with their healthcare provider. It also recommended that individuals with symptoms delay pregnancy for a certain period of time. However, the recommendation to postpone pregnancy has limitations and does not help those who are already in the initial weeks of pregnancy. The Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH) also encouraged women, planning to postpone pregnancies, to seek contraceptive methods at Basic Health Units (Brasil, MOH, 2016b). As of 15 September 2016, 72 countries and territories have reported evidence of mosquito-borne ZIKV transmission since 2007 (70 have reports from 2015), of which 55 countries are experiencing a first outbreak of ZIKV since 2015, with no previous evidence of circulation. The ongoing transmission is primarily by mosquitoes (WHO, 2016b), while there is evidence of sexual transmission of ZIKV (Armstrong ). Since almost 74% of the Brazilian population depend entirely on government provided healthcare, we conducted an assessment to report the trends in sales of hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptives in Brazil both in public and private sectors both before and throughout the ZIKV outbreak.

Materials and Methods

We obtained specific data from all pharmaceutical companies based in Brazil, regarding the sales of hormonal contraceptives in both the public and private sector. Data about the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS, Mirena, Bayer Oy, Turku, Finland) were obtained from Bayer Oy; data regarding the subdermal implant (Implanon, Merck, Oss, The Netherland) were from Merck and data regarding the copper-intrauterine device (TCu380A IUD, Optima) were from the Brazilian manufacturer (Injeflex, Sao Paulo, Brazil). Our data tracked sales from September 2014 through to August 2016. The individual sales of each company were aggregated up to monthly sales. We categorized sales of: (i) oral, vaginal and transdermal contraceptives, i.e. combined oral contraceptives (COC), progestin-only pill (POP), patches and vaginal rings, together in cycles/units of 1 month supply; (ii) injectable contraceptives, i.e. DMPA and once-a-month injectables, together in ampoules, although the latter are effective for only 1 month; (iii) long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), i.e. IUD, the LNG-IUS and implants, in devices and (iv) emergency contraceptive (EC) pills, i.e. the LNG-pill (the only EC available in Brazil) in single pills. The data represent monthly sales. Furthermore, we calculated the average for the sales of each group of contraceptives before the declaration and the announcement of the first case of microcephaly and the warning to reconsider or postpone pregnancy by the Brazilian MoH, i.e. October/November 2015. To estimate the unmet needs of contraception, we used the US method of estimation to calculate the number of Brazilian women who need and desire effective contraceptive methods (Daniels ) and made the following assumptions. Unmet needs was defined according to the WHO (2016b) as ‘those women who are fecund and sexually active but are not using any method of contraception, and report not wanting any more children or wanting to delay the next child’. Of the 208 million inhabitants, almost 52 million are women of reproductive age (15–49 years). From this number, we excluded pregnant and 4 weeks’ postpartum women, infertile and sterilized women (22 million) and those who want to become pregnant, or are not sexually active (8 million). Based on these calculations, we assume that at least 22 million women will need contraception to avoid unintended pregnancy (Daniels ).

Results

We estimated that our data cover more than 95% of the real sales of contraceptives at national level. The majority of sales comprise of COCs, POPs, patches and vaginal rings, representing 12.7–13.8 million cycles/units per month (90%). The second largest sales were of injectables, representing ~0.8 to 1.5 million ampoules per month (9.5%). The LARC methods showed sales of 37–41 thousand devices per month (0.5%). The peak of sales was different for each group of contraceptives; however, no significant increase was observed for any method either after the outbreak of ZIKV in Brazil or in line with the advice from the Brazilian MoH to avoid or postpone pregnancy. The EC pill sales were between 1.0 and 1.3 million of pills per month. We estimated that the figures presented here cover almost 18 million women. The bimonthly data are shown in Table I and monthly data are shown in Fig. 1. In addition, Table II shows that there were no significant changes in the average monthly sales among the three groups of contraceptives before and after the announcement of the first case of microcephaly and the Brazilian MoH warning to avoid pregnancy.
Table I

Two month sales of different contraceptives in Brazil, September 2014–August 2016.

Methods[a]Sep/Oct 2014Nov/Dec 2014Jan/Feb 2015Mar/Apr 2015May/Jun 2015Jul/Aug 2015Sep/Oct 2015Nov/Dec 2015Jan/Feb 2016Mar/Apr 2016May/Jun 2016Jul/Aug 2016
PPR (1 month supply)26 629 58326 658 86926 494 61627 410 43225 448 76526 837 31127 165 47527 488 35524 406 02827 496 53626 125 43226 240 362
Injectables (ampules for 1 or 3 months supply)2 699 5272 659 3982 513 7942 802 1382 832 1142 977 4293 049 1792 921 5911 606 8662 819 3742 689 3322 756 770
LARC (devices)75 80774 15573 87377 54376 40777 40478 65376 43377 64580 48182 05580 060
EC (pills)2 465 8182 390 4392 529 0022 467 8042 433 8642 565 8532 567 7672 630 3882 507 2052 584 5212 514 3822 802 971

aPPR: combined oral contraceptives; progestin-only pills; transdermal patch and vaginal ring; LARC: long-acting reversible contraceptives (copper-IUD, the LNG-IUS and implants); EC: emergency contraceptive pills.

Figure 1

Monthly sales of different contraceptives in Brazil, September 2014–August 2016. PPR: COC + POP + transdermal patch + vaginal ring; LARC: long-acting reversible contraceptives, i.e. copper-IUD + the LNG-IUS + implants; EC: emergency contraceptive pills. The black line indicates the first Brazilian report of microcephaly associated with ZIKV and the red line indicates the alert to women to avoid pregnancy, from the Brazilian MoH. COC, combined oral contraceptives; POP, progestin-only pills.

Table II

Average monthly sales of different contraceptives before and after the announcement of the first case of microcephaly and the warning to avoid pregnancy by the Brazilian MoH.

Methods[a]Sep 2014/Sep 2015Dec 2015/Aug 2016
PPR (1 month supply)13 436 35113 459 924
Injectables (ampoules for 1 or 3 months supply)1 448 9611 370 094
LARC (devices)38 62939 419

aPPR: combined oral contraceptives; progestin-only pills; transdermal patch and vaginal ring; LARC: long-acting reversible contraceptives (copper-IUD, the LNG-IUS and implants).

Monthly sales of different contraceptives in Brazil, September 2014–August 2016. PPR: COC + POP + transdermal patch + vaginal ring; LARC: long-acting reversible contraceptives, i.e. copper-IUD + the LNG-IUS + implants; EC: emergency contraceptive pills. The black line indicates the first Brazilian report of microcephaly associated with ZIKV and the red line indicates the alert to women to avoid pregnancy, from the Brazilian MoH. COC, combined oral contraceptives; POP, progestin-only pills. Two month sales of different contraceptives in Brazil, September 2014–August 2016. aPPR: combined oral contraceptives; progestin-only pills; transdermal patch and vaginal ring; LARC: long-acting reversible contraceptives (copper-IUD, the LNG-IUS and implants); EC: emergency contraceptive pills. Average monthly sales of different contraceptives before and after the announcement of the first case of microcephaly and the warning to avoid pregnancy by the Brazilian MoH. aPPR: combined oral contraceptives; progestin-only pills; transdermal patch and vaginal ring; LARC: long-acting reversible contraceptives (copper-IUD, the LNG-IUS and implants).

Discussion

Our assessment showed that despite the ZIKV outbreak, the number of sales of units of contraceptives did not show significant changes during the 24 months of observation, even though the study period included the peak of the ZIKV epidemic and the reported cases of microcephaly and other CNS disorders in newborns. In addition, the sales of LARC methods, which are the most effective contraceptive methods, were very low (Bahamondes ; Secura ). This indicates that most contraception users utilize methods, which have comparatively lower effectiveness with typical use, such as COCs, POPs and injectables. The last Brazilian Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) was conducted almost 20 years ago (Brazil, DHS, 1996) but estimates from other sources (Daniels ; Population Reference Bureau, 2015; UNFPA, 2016) have indicated that 75% of women aged 15–49 years old use hormonal and LARC methods and that there is an 8% unmet need for family planning. Among those women using contraception, COC and tubal ligation were the most prevalent among methods and LARC methods accounted for only 1.8% of the methods used (Brazil, DHS, 1996). We assume that at least 22 million women need contraception to avoid unintended pregnancy and we found that almost 18 million women are protected with actual sales of contraceptives. However among the users, 90% use contraceptives with low typical use effectiveness. Consequently, there are high rates of unplanned pregnancies in Brazil, which are estimated to account for ~55% of all pregnancies (Le ) and are possibly associated with the high number of sales of EC pills (Rocha ). The unmet need for contraception is likely to rise further if, in near future, fewer women decide to get pregnant in response to ZIKV epidemic. Their contraceptive demands will not be met with the observed current sales. In Brazil, contraceptives such as COC, POP, patches, vaginal rings and EC pills are available over the counter, but the low sales figures for LARC indicate that fewer women are using them. The low utilization of LARC could be due to many barriers such as lack of supply of the LNG-IUS and implants in the public sector, a lack of training of healthcare providers on LARC placement, incomplete insurance coverage or a lack of reimbursement for LARC, high up-front costs and a low number of contraceptive service sites. It is well described that the high cost of LARC methods is one important barrier to access these methods (Peipert ). In Brazil, the low availability of LNG-IUS and contraceptive implants in the public sector and the high cost in the private sector is a major barrier for many women. All of these variables impact the ability of women to prevent unintended pregnancies. It is important to take into account that the Brazilian National Health System (Sistema Unificado de Saude) provides free coverage, including contraceptive methods (except the LNG-IUS and implants, with rare exceptions) at no cost to women, to ~74% of the population through the public health posts and hospitals. The remainder of the population depends on private insurance or out-of-pocket payments in the private sector. In the context of the ZIKV outbreak, access to effective contraceptive methods in Brazil must be improved. There are barriers in the basic health network in obtaining consultations and LARCs are methods that only physicians are allowed to insert; sometimes they expire on the shelf at service delivery points. It is necessary to employ a new model of family planning management to increase access and use of LARC methods to reduce unintended pregnancies through task sharing, where applicable. Requests for mifepristone/misoprostol for medical termination were recently reported in 19 Latin American countries (Aiken ). In Brazil, despite the autochthonous ZIKV infection, abortion is illegal in most circumstances and women were advised to avoid pregnancy due to risk of transmission. The authors reported 1210 requests for medical termination between November 2015 and March 2016, when the number of expected requests was 582, based on 5-year trends. The relative change between actual and expected requests was 108% (P < 0.001). These results may further indirectly indicate the lack of access to effective and acceptable contraception among Brazilian women, especially in the wake of advice to avoid pregnancy due to ZIKV. Our assessment has several limitations. Although the use of contraceptive methods was already high and no change was noted during the study period, the ZIKV outbreak may have changed the pregnancy intentions of women in Brazil. Consequently, the number of women planning pregnancy may be lower than recorded. In addition, the contraceptive sales figures did not include the sales of condoms, which are an affordable approach, although their contraceptive effectiveness is less than that of the LARC methods (Trussell, 2011). This lack of information is a limitation, as the condoms might not only prevent pregnancies, but also ZIKV-related sexual transmission. In addition, although the data represent sales to public health posts, hospitals and private sector, this does not necessarily represent actual use by women. One of the strengths of this study was that the information on contraceptive sales was obtained from various reliable sources, including all sales of LARC methods, that allowed our study to fill an important gap in current assessments of women's reproductive needs including contraceptive use and method preference, primarily in the ZIKV-affected areas. Projections estimate millions of additional cases of ZIKV infection. A coordinated response is needed from federal, state and municipal governments as well as academia, professional organizations, private insurance companies, policy makers and all stakeholders, to ensure access to a wide range of contraceptives for women during the ZIKV outbreak. This Brazilian assessment identifies challenges in contraceptive access, especially for LARC methods, and represents an alternative source of data to help us understand trends in demand for contraception in ZIKV-affected areas. In case of another outbreak in countries where there is substandard availability and accessibility of contraception, authorities and family planners might learn from these data in order to work together for adequate and rapid solutions.

Authors’ roles

L.B., M.A., I.M. and A.F. contributed equally to the study idea, the development of the study, the writing of the manuscript and the review all the versions.

Funding

The award # 2015/20504-9 and from an anonymous donor. The funding sources did not play a role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication. This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts, and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organisation.

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  18 in total

1.  Evidence of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus.

Authors:  Eric D'Ortenzio; Sophie Matheron; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Xavier de Lamballerie; Bruno Hubert; Géraldine Piorkowski; Marianne Maquart; Diane Descamps; Florence Damond; Isabelle Leparc-Goffart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Colleen McNicholas; Jennifer Mullersman; Christina M Buckel; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly.

Authors:  Jernej Mlakar; Misa Korva; Nataša Tul; Mara Popović; Mateja Poljšak-Prijatelj; Jerica Mraz; Marko Kolenc; Katarina Resman Rus; Tina Vesnaver Vipotnik; Vesna Fabjan Vodušek; Alenka Vizjak; Jože Pižem; Miroslav Petrovec; Tatjana Avšič Županc
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Update: Interim Guidance for Prevention of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus - United States, July 2016.

Authors:  John T Brooks; Allison Friedman; Rachel E Kachur; Michael LaFlam; Philip J Peters; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; Bruna F Bottura; M Valeria Bahamondes; Mayara P Gonçalves; Vinicius M Correia; Ximena Espejo-Arce; Maria H Sousa; Ilza Monteiro; Arlete Fernandes
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Travel-Associated Zika Virus Disease Cases Among U.S. Residents--United States, January 2015-February 2016.

Authors:  Paige Armstrong; Morgan Hennessey; Monica Adams; Cara Cherry; Sophia Chiu; Alexia Harrist; Natalie Kwit; Lillianne Lewis; Dana Olzenak McGuire; Titilope Oduyebo; Kate Russell; Pamela Talley; Mary Tanner; Charnetta Williams
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Requests for Abortion in Latin America Related to Concern about Zika Virus Exposure.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; James G Scott; Rebecca Gomperts; James Trussell; Marc Worrell; Catherine E Aiken
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Potential for Zika virus transmission through blood transfusion demonstrated during an outbreak in French Polynesia, November 2013 to February 2014.

Authors:  D Musso; T Nhan; E Robin; C Roche; D Bierlaire; K Zisou; A Shan Yan; V M Cao-Lormeau; J Broult
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2014-04-10

10.  The burden of unintended pregnancies in Brazil: a social and public health system cost analysis.

Authors:  Hoa H Le; Mark P Connolly; Luis Bahamondes; Jose G Cecatti; Jingbo Yu; Henry X Hu
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-07-16
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Zika virus for infertility specialists: current literature, guidelines, and resources.

Authors:  Jamie P Dubaut; Nelson I Agudelo Higuita; Alexander M Quaas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Zika-Associated Microcephaly Epidemic and Birth Rate Reduction in Brazilian Cities.

Authors:  Fredi Alexander Diaz-Quijano; Daniele Maria Pelissari; Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Brazil's Missing Infants: Zika Risk Changes Reproductive Behavior.

Authors:  Marcos A Rangel; Jenna Nobles; Amar Hamoudi
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2020-10

4.  Women's reproductive health knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to the Zika virus outbreak in northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Vilela Borges; Caroline Moreau; Anne Burke; Osmara Alves Dos Santos; Christiane Borges Chofakian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Zika Virus Infection, Basic and Clinical Aspects: A Review Article.

Authors:  Farshid Noorbakhsh; Kamal Abdolmohammadi; Yousef Fatahi; Hossein Dalili; Mehrnaz Rasoolinejad; Farshid Rezaei; Mostafa Salehi-Vaziri; Nazanin Zahra Shafiei-Jandaghi; Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki; Morteza Zaim; Mohammad Hossein Nicknam
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.429

6.  Is the non-identity problem relevant to public health and policy? An online survey.

Authors:  Keyur Doolabh; Lucius Caviola; Julian Savulescu; Michael J Selgelid; Dominic Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Understanding sexual and reproductive health needs of young women living in Zika affected regions: a qualitative study in northeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Debora Diniz; Moazzam Ali; Ilana Ambrogi; Luciana Brito
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Short-term effects of the COVID-19 state of emergency on contraceptive access and utilization in Mozambique.

Authors:  Jessica Leight; Catherine Hensly; Marcos Chissano; Liza Ali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Risk of Sexually Transmitted Zika Virus in a Cohort of Economically Disadvantaged Urban Residents.

Authors:  Juan P Aguilar Ticona; Huma Baig; Nivison Nery; Simon Doss-Gollin; Gielson A Sacramento; Haritha Adhikarla; M Catherine Muenker; Elsio A Wunder; Eduardo J M Nascimento; Ernesto T A Marques; Mitermayer G Reis; Albert I Ko; Federico Costa
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Construction and Identification of Recombinant HEK293T Cell Lines Expressing Non-structural Protein 1 of Zika Virus.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Pengfei Wan; Qingqing Li; Xiaoxin Li; Andrew Li; Huangyao Chen; Jingjing Li; Wenhan Liang; Haifa Zheng; Weiwang Gu; Hongwei Li
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.