Holly Emma Syddall1, Leo David Westbury1, Richard Dodds2, Elaine Dennison1,3, Cyrus Cooper1,4,5, Avan Aihie Sayer1,6,7,8. 1. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 2. Academic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 3. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. 4. NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 5. NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 6. NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 7. Newcastle University Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 8. NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Abstract
Background: weak hand grip strength in later life is a risk factor for disability, morbidity and mortality and is central to definitions of sarcopenia and frailty. It is unclear whether rate of change in grip strength adds to level of grip strength as a risk factor for poor ageing outcomes. Methods: study participants were 292 community-dwelling men and women whose grip strength was measured during the 1994/5 (average age 67) and 2003/5 (average age 76) phases of the Hertfordshire Ageing Study, UK. Individual rate of change in grip strength was estimated using a residual change method. Mortality was followed-up to 2011 (42 men and 21 women died). Results: average grip strengths in 2003/5 were 38.4 kg (standard deviation [SD] = 8.1) and 23.7 kg (SD = 6.6) for men and women respectively. Average annualised rates of change in grip strength (2003/5 minus 1994/5) were modest owing to a healthy-participant effect (men: -0.12 kg/y, SD = 0.71; women: 0.08 kg/y, SD = 0.54) but varied widely. Mortality risk varied according to level and rate of change in grip strength (P = 0.03); death rates per 100 person years of follow-up were 6.7 (95% CI: 4.6, 9.6) among participants who lost grip over time and had low grip in 2003/5, in contrast with 0.8 (95% CI: 0.1, 5.8) among participants whose grip changed little over time and remained high in 2003/5. Conclusions: levels of grip strength in later life should be considered in conjunction with estimates of change in grip strength identified by repeat measurement over time. Normative data for longitudinal change in grip strength are required.
Background: weak hand grip strength in later life is a risk factor for disability, morbidity and mortality and is central to definitions of sarcopenia and frailty. It is unclear whether rate of change in grip strength adds to level of grip strength as a risk factor for poor ageing outcomes. Methods: study participants were 292 community-dwellingmen and women whose grip strength was measured during the 1994/5 (average age 67) and 2003/5 (average age 76) phases of the Hertfordshire Ageing Study, UK. Individual rate of change in grip strength was estimated using a residual change method. Mortality was followed-up to 2011 (42 men and 21 women died). Results: average grip strengths in 2003/5 were 38.4 kg (standard deviation [SD] = 8.1) and 23.7 kg (SD = 6.6) for men and women respectively. Average annualised rates of change in grip strength (2003/5 minus 1994/5) were modest owing to a healthy-participant effect (men: -0.12 kg/y, SD = 0.71; women: 0.08 kg/y, SD = 0.54) but varied widely. Mortality risk varied according to level and rate of change in grip strength (P = 0.03); death rates per 100 person years of follow-up were 6.7 (95% CI: 4.6, 9.6) among participants who lost grip over time and had low grip in 2003/5, in contrast with 0.8 (95% CI: 0.1, 5.8) among participants whose grip changed little over time and remained high in 2003/5. Conclusions: levels of grip strength in later life should be considered in conjunction with estimates of change in grip strength identified by repeat measurement over time. Normative data for longitudinal change in grip strength are required.
Authors: Joan Vermeulen; Jacques C L Neyens; Erik van Rossum; Marieke D Spreeuwenberg; Luc P de Witte Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Ramzi W Nahhas; Audrey C Choh; Miryoung Lee; William M Cameron Chumlea; Dana L Duren; Roger M Siervogel; Richard J Sherwood; Bradford Towne; Stefan A Czerwinski Journal: Am J Hum Biol Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.937
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Robert S Wilson; Patricia A Boyle; Julia L Bienias; David A Bennett Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: C Cooper; R Fielding; M Visser; L J van Loon; Y Rolland; E Orwoll; K Reid; S Boonen; W Dere; S Epstein; B Mitlak; Y Tsouderos; A A Sayer; R Rizzoli; J Y Reginster; J A Kanis Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Robin M Daly; Bjorn E Rosengren; Gayani Alwis; Henrik G Ahlborg; Ingemar Sernbo; Magnus K Karlsson Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2013-07-06 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Deyu Meng; Hongzhi Guo; Siyu Liang; Zhibo Tian; Ran Wang; Guang Yang; Ziheng Wang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Ziyi Wang; Deyu Meng; Shichun He; Hongzhi Guo; Zhibo Tian; Meiqi Wei; Guang Yang; Ziheng Wang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-04 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Antoneta Granic; Karen Davies; Carol Jagger; Richard M Dodds; Thomas B L Kirkwood; Avan A Sayer Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Sathya Karunananthan; Erica E M Moodie; Howard Bergman; Hélène Payette; Paula H Diehr; Christina Wolfson Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.163