Literature DB >> 27932294

Large-Scale Structure-Based Prediction and Identification of Novel Protease Substrates Using Computational Protein Design.

Manasi A Pethe1, Aliza B Rubenstein2, Sagar D Khare3.   

Abstract

Characterizing the substrate specificity of protease enzymes is critical for illuminating the molecular basis of their diverse and complex roles in a wide array of biological processes. Rapid and accurate prediction of their extended substrate specificity would also aid in the design of custom proteases capable of selectively and controllably cleaving biotechnologically or therapeutically relevant targets. However, current in silico approaches for protease specificity prediction, rely on, and are therefore limited by, machine learning of sequence patterns in known experimental data. Here, we describe a general approach for predicting peptidase substrates de novo using protein structure modeling and biophysical evaluation of enzyme-substrate complexes. We construct atomic resolution models of thousands of candidate substrate-enzyme complexes for each of five model proteases belonging to the four major protease mechanistic classes-serine, cysteine, aspartyl, and metallo-proteases-and develop a discriminatory scoring function using enzyme design modules from Rosetta and AMBER's MMPBSA. We rank putative substrates based on calculated interaction energy with a modeled near-attack conformation of the enzyme active site. We show that the energetic patterns obtained from these simulations can be used to robustly rank and classify known cleaved and uncleaved peptides and that these structural-energetic patterns have greater discriminatory power compared to purely sequence-based statistical inference. Combining sequence and energetic patterns using machine-learning algorithms further improves classification performance, and analysis of structural models provides physical insight into the structural basis for the observed specificities. We further tested the predictive capability of the model by designing and experimentally characterizing the cleavage of four novel substrate motifs for the hepatitis C virus NS3/4 protease using an in vivo assay. The presented structure-based approach is generalizable to other protease enzymes with known or modeled structures, and complements existing experimental methods for specificity determination.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rosetta software; computational modeling; proteases; specificity prediction; substrate specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27932294     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  7 in total

1.  Data-driven supervised learning of a viral protease specificity landscape from deep sequencing and molecular simulations.

Authors:  Manasi A Pethe; Aliza B Rubenstein; Sagar D Khare
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Learning peptide recognition rules for a low-specificity protein.

Authors:  Lucas C Wheeler; Arden Perkins; Caitlyn E Wong; Michael J Harms
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Recent Developments and Applications of the MMPBSA Method.

Authors:  Changhao Wang; D'Artagnan Greene; Li Xiao; Ruxi Qi; Ray Luo
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2018-01-10

4.  MFPred: Rapid and accurate prediction of protein-peptide recognition multispecificity using self-consistent mean field theory.

Authors:  Aliza B Rubenstein; Manasi A Pethe; Sagar D Khare
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Electrostatic recognition in substrate binding to serine proteases.

Authors:  Birgit J Waldner; Johannes Kraml; Ursula Kahler; Alexander Spinn; Michael Schauperl; Maren Podewitz; Julian E Fuchs; Gabriele Cruciani; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.137

6.  An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ochoa; Mikhail Magnitov; Roman A Laskowski; Pilar Cossio; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Structural basis for peptide substrate specificities of glycosyltransferase GalNAc-T2.

Authors:  Sai Pooja Mahajan; Yashes Srinivasan; Jason W Labonte; Matthew P DeLisa; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 13.084

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.