Literature DB >> 27931638

Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound.

Sundeep Lakhtakia1.   

Abstract

Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) provides the unique opportunity to visualize, interrogate and intervene gastrointestinal (GI) luminal, mural or peri-luminal structures and pathology with negligible adverse effects. Diagnostic, upper GI and rectal EUS is feasible, extremely safe, and efficacious. Most EUS guided interventions are safe, effective and minimally invasive, compared to peers in the percutaneous radiological or surgical procedures. As with any endoscopic procedure, EUS and its guided interventions may be accompanied by adverse events. EUS related complications are generally infrequent in expert hands, and mainly include bleeding and perforation. However, the nature and severity of adverse events associated with each EUS guided procedure are unique. Hence, it is paramount for endosonographer to have sufficient knowledge of the indications, techniques, and potential risks involved before contemplating any given procedure. Most common intervention with EUS is transmural fine needle aspiration (FNA), which is an extremely safe procedure. EUS guided drainage procedures are rapidly evolving with newer devices and methods being employed. Among them, EUS guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection-pseudocyst or walled off necrosis (WON), has largely replaced other methods (surgical, percutaneous or non-EUS endoscopic) with acceptable complications. Currently, dedicated metal stents are more widely used compared to plastic stents for drainage of PFC, especially WON. EUS has made a definite impact in biliary access and drainage of obstructed biliary system, in patients where ERCP has failed or is technically not possible, closely competing with percutaneous biliary drainage. In spite of some complications, recent improvement in devices for bilio-enteric fistula creation and stent designs, has added to its safety and efficacy. EUS guided pancreatic duct drainage remains the most challenging of EUS guided interventions where in-roads are being made. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications of EUS; EUS guided FNA; EUS guided PD drainage; EUS guided biliary drainage; EUS guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27931638     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  12 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using a newly designed metal stent with a thin delivery system: a preclinical study in phantom and porcine models.

Authors:  Kosuke Minaga; Masayuki Kitano; Masahiro Itonaga; Hajime Imai; Takeshi Miyata; Kentaro Yamao; Takashi Tamura; Junya Nuta; Kenji Warigaya; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 2.  Rectal Endoscopic Ultrasound in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Stephen Hasak; Vladimir Kushnir
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-04-12

Review 3.  Management of pancreatic fluid collections.

Authors:  Dimpal Bhakta; Rabia de Latour; Lauren Khanna
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ramkaji Baniya; Sunil Upadhaya; Seetharamprasad Madala; Subash Chandra Subedi; Tabrez Shaik Mohammed; Ghassan Bachuwa
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-03

5.  Safety and Complications of Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Monica Saumoy; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19

6.  Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Pancreatic Pseudocyst drainage experience at a tertiary care unit.

Authors:  Erum Kazim; Muhammad Ali Taj; Imrana Zulfikar; Jawad Azeem
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 7.  EUS-guided versus percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography biliary drainage for obstructed distal malignant biliary strictures in patients who have failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Umar Hayat; Caitlin Bakker; Ahmed Dirweesh; Mohammed Y Khan; Douglas G Adler; Hayrettin Okut; Noel Leul; Mohammad Bilal; Ali A Siddiqui
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  The resectable pancreatic lesion: To FNA or not to FNA? A diagnostic dilemma, FNA cons.

Authors:  Anand V Sahai
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 9.  Algorithm for the multidisciplinary management of hemorrhage in EUS-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collections.

Authors:  Tian-An Jiang; Li-Ting Xie
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 1.337

10.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ascites aspiration in the hands of the chest physician using the EBUS endoscope in the oesophagus.

Authors:  Rafi Nessar; Louise L Toennesen; Uffe Bodtger; Ida Skovgaard Christiansen; Paul Frost Clementsen
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.