Literature DB >> 27930328

Estimating uncertainty in respondent-driven sampling using a tree bootstrap method.

Aaron J Baraff1, Tyler H McCormick1,2, Adrian E Raftery3,2.   

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a network-based form of chain-referral sampling used to estimate attributes of populations that are difficult to access using standard survey tools. Although it has grown quickly in popularity since its introduction, the statistical properties of RDS estimates remain elusive. In particular, the sampling variability of these estimates has been shown to be much higher than previously acknowledged, and even methods designed to account for RDS result in misleadingly narrow confidence intervals. In this paper, we introduce a tree bootstrap method for estimating uncertainty in RDS estimates based on resampling recruitment trees. We use simulations from known social networks to show that the tree bootstrap method not only outperforms existing methods but also captures the high variability of RDS, even in extreme cases with high design effects. We also apply the method to data from injecting drug users in Ukraine. Unlike other methods, the tree bootstrap depends only on the structure of the sampled recruitment trees, not on the attributes being measured on the respondents, so correlations between attributes can be estimated as well as variability. Our results suggest that it is possible to accurately assess the high level of uncertainty inherent in RDS.

Keywords:  HIV; hard-to-reach population; injecting drug user; snowball sampling; social network

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27930328      PMCID: PMC5187726          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1617258113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  Assessing respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Sharad Goel; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Prevalence of HIV infection among young adults in the United States: results from the Add Health study.

Authors:  Martina Morris; Mark S Handcock; William C Miller; Carol A Ford; John L Schmitz; Marcia M Hobbs; Myron S Cohen; Kathleen M Harris; J Richard Udry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Social networks in disease transmission: the Colorado Springs Study.

Authors:  R B Rothenberg; D E Woodhouse; J J Potterat; S Q Muth; W W Darrow; A S Klovdahl
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1995

Review 4.  Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Recruitment Patterns on RDS Estimates among a Socially Ordered Population of Female Sex Workers in China.

Authors:  Thespina J Yamanis; M Giovanna Merli; William Whipple Neely; Felicia Feng Tian; James Moody; Xiaowen Tu; Ersheng Gao
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2013-08

6.  Mapping a social network of heterosexuals at high risk for HIV infection.

Authors:  D E Woodhouse; R B Rothenberg; J J Potterat; W W Darrow; S Q Muth; A S Klovdahl; H P Zimmerman; H L Rogers; T S Maldonado; J B Muth
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  Network Model-Assisted Inference from Respondent-Driven Sampling Data.

Authors:  Krista J Gile; Mark S Handcock
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.483

8.  Social networks and infectious disease: the Colorado Springs Study.

Authors:  A S Klovdahl; J J Potterat; D E Woodhouse; J B Muth; S Q Muth; W W Darrow
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Diagnostics for Respondent-driven Sampling.

Authors:  Krista J Gile; Lisa G Johnston; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 10.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: "STROBE-RDS" statement.

Authors:  Richard G White; Avi J Hakim; Matthew J Salganik; Michael W Spiller; Lisa G Johnston; Ligia Kerr; Carl Kendall; Amy Drake; David Wilson; Kate Orroth; Matthias Egger; Wolfgang Hladik
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 6.437

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Consistency for the tree bootstrap in respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  A K B Green; T H McCormick; A E Raftery
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  PrEP Chicago: A randomized controlled peer change agent intervention to promote the adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among young Black men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Lindsay E Young; Phil Schumm; Leigh Alon; Alida Bouris; Matthew Ferreira; Brandon Hill; Aditya S Khanna; Thomas W Valente; John A Schneider
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Evaluating Variance Estimators for Respondent-Driven Sampling.

Authors:  Michael W Spiller; Krista J Gile; Mark S Handcock; Corinne M Mar; Cyprian Wejnert
Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol       Date:  2017-08-17

4.  NEW SURVEY QUESTIONS AND ESTIMATORS FOR NETWORK CLUSTERING WITH RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING DATA.

Authors:  Ashton M Verdery; Jacob C Fisher; Nalyn Siripong; Kahina Abdesselam; Shawn Bauldry
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2017-07-06

5.  Respondent Driven Sampling for Immigrant Populations: A Health Survey of Foreign-Born Korean Americans.

Authors:  Sunghee Lee; Ai Rene Ong; Chen Chen; Michael Elliott
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2020-09-12

6.  The Mediating Role of Chinese College Students' Control Strategies: Belief in a Just World and Life History Strategy.

Authors:  Xuanxuan Lin; Rongzhao Wang; Tao Huang; Hua Gao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-03

7.  Is psychological flexibility a mediator between perceived stress and general anxiety or depression among suspected patients of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)?

Authors:  Chi Huang; Jiaying Xie; Theresah Owusua; Zhiheng Chen; Jiangang Wang; Chunxiang Qin; Qingnan He
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2021-07-15

8.  Generalized least squares can overcome the critical threshold in respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Sebastien Roch; Karl Rohe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Unweighted regression models perform better than weighted regression techniques for respondent-driven sampling data: results from a simulation study.

Authors:  Lisa Avery; Nooshin Rotondi; Constance McKnight; Michelle Firestone; Janet Smylie; Michael Rotondi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  General regression methods for respondent-driven sampling data.

Authors:  Mamadou Yauck; Erica Em Moodie; Herak Apelian; Alain Fourmigue; Daniel Grace; Trevor Hart; Gilles Lambert; Joseph Cox
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.