Literature DB >> 27928671

Effective stepwise training and procedure standardization for young surgeons to perform laparoscopic left hepatectomy.

Shinichiro Yamada1, Mitsuo Shimada2, Satoru Imura2, Yuji Morine2, Tetsuya Ikemoto2, Yu Saito2, Chie Takasu2, Masato Yoshikawa2, Hiroki Teraoku2, Toshiaki Yoshimoto2, Atsushi Takata2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatectomy remains one of the most difficult procedures for young surgeons to perform. We recently developed a new training method and standardization procedure for teaching young surgeons to perform laparoscopic left hepatectomy (Lap-LHx). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of our method.
METHODS: In 2004, we standardized a laparoscopic procedure for Lap-LHx, using a laparoscopy-assisted method as a stepping stone. The laparoscopic training method comprised the following three steps: (1) training in fundamental procedures using a dry box and checking by mentors; (2) detailed preoperative simulation using Vincent three-dimensional software for each patient; and (3) self-assessment including understanding of relevant anatomy and completion grade for each procedure using a check sheet and feedback by both mentors and a professor. Twenty-three Lap-LHx procedures performed during the study period were divided into two groups: those performed by young non-board-certified surgeons (n = 9) and those performed by senior board-certified surgeons (n = 14).
RESULTS: The blood loss and operative time were similar in the young surgeon (194 g and 336 min, respectively) and senior surgeon groups (208 g and 322 min, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our standardized Lap-LHx procedure and stepwise training to perform it enable young surgeons to perform Lap-LHx as confidently and safely as more experienced surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Feedback; Laparoscopic hepatectomy; Mentor; Simulation; Young surgeon

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27928671     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5273-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation.

Authors:  Sanne M B I Botden; Fawaz Torab; Sonja N Buzink; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Current status of laparoscopic liver surgery in Japan: results of a multicenter Japanese experience.

Authors:  Satoru Imura; Mitsuo Shimada; Tohru Utsunomiya; Yuji Morine; Go Wakabayashi; Hironori Kaneko
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Approaches to laparoscopic liver resection: a meta-analysis of the role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and the hybrid technique.

Authors:  Yasushi Hasegawa; Alan J Koffron; Joseph F Buell; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 7.027

4.  Arantius' ligament approach for the left extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle in pure laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.

Authors:  Akihiro Cho; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Osamu Kainuma; Takumi Ota; Seongjin Park; Hiroo Yanagibashi; Hidehito Arimitsu; Atsushi Ikeda; Hiroaki Souda; Yoshihiro Nabeya; Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Matsuo Nagata
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2012-11

5.  A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Daisuke Ban; Minoru Tanabe; Hiromitsu Ito; Yuichiro Otsuka; Hiroyuki Nitta; Yuta Abe; Yasushi Hasegawa; Toshio Katagiri; Chisato Takagi; Osamu Itano; Hironori Kaneko; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.027

6.  Laparoscopic liver resections: a single center experience.

Authors:  J L Dulucq; P Wintringer; C Stabilini; J Berticelli; A Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jeanett Strandbygaard; Flemming Bjerrum; Mathilde Maagaard; Per Winkel; Christian Rifbjerg Larsen; Charlotte Ringsted; Christian Gluud; Teodor Grantcharov; Bent Ottesen; Jette Led Sorensen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more.

Authors:  Alan J Koffron; Greg Auffenberg; Robert Kung; Michael Abecassis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study.

Authors:  M Morino; I Morra; E Rosso; C Miglietta; C Garrone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  An initial experience and evolution of laparoscopic hepatic resectional surgery.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Mark J Thomas; Travis C Doty; Keith S Gersin; Todd D Merchen; Manish Gupta; Steven M Rudich; E Steve Woodle
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  2 in total

1.  Training for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Tamotsu Kuroki; Hikaru Fujioka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Crucial Roles of the Assistant Surgeon During Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kajiwara; Fuminori Ishii; Takahide Sasaki; Ryo Nakashima; Suguru Hasegawa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.