Literature DB >> 27928047

Validating Use of Internet-Submitted Carbon Monoxide Values by Video to Determine Quit Status.

Joshua L Karelitz1, Valerie C Michael1, Margaret Boldry1, Kenneth A Perkins1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Daily visits to biochemically verify continuous smoking abstinence via expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) may deter participation in cessation trials. One way to reduce need for daily visits while continuing to monitor abstinence success may be use of a recent procedure to verify abstinence from daily CO values via the Internet. This method requires participants submit to study staff video recordings of themselves correctly using a CO monitor. However, it has not been clearly demonstrated that those classified quit via Internet-submitted videos of CO would be reliably classified quit when assessed in lab.
METHODS: Our study examined agreement in quit status from Internet-submitted CO values with quit status via CO collected in later same-day lab visits. Participants (n = 23) were from a short-term cessation study who agreed to record and submit videos of offsite CO testing, in addition to attending daily lab visits. All CO values were obtained via Bedfont pico+ Smokerlyzer monitors, with CO < 8 ppm indicating quit. During two 4-day practice quit attempts, a video was submitted before daily lab visits, up to eight videos each.
RESULTS: Of the total of 150 videos submitted, 97 videos indicated "not quit" and 53 "quit." Cohen's Kappa indicated substantial agreement in quit status between assessments, 0.70, p < .001, as 85% of the videos indicating "quit" CO were also "quit" CO in lab.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, these results are the first validation of daily Internet-submitted CO values to confirm daily quit status, supporting the utility of this approach for close monitoring of continuous abstinence. IMPLICATIONS: This study compared consistency between quit status from CO values submitted over the Internet and quit status via CO collected in later same-day lab visits. Findings indicate substantial agreement in quit status between these two methods of CO assessment. Our results validate the use of Internet-submitted CO values to verify daily quit status. This method can be used in future cessation trials as a means to biochemically validate continuous abstinence without the burden of daily lab visits or relying on self-report of recent smoking lapses.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27928047      PMCID: PMC5896514          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  29 in total

1.  Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence.

Authors:  Karl Fagerström
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: proposal for a common standard.

Authors:  Robert West; Peter Hajek; Lindsay Stead; John Stapleton
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  I am your smartphone, and I know you are about to smoke: the application of mobile sensing and computing approaches to smoking research and treatment.

Authors:  F Joseph McClernon; Romit Roy Choudhury
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Early lapses in a cessation attempt: lapse contexts, cessation success, and predictors of early lapse.

Authors:  Jonathan F Deiches; Timothy B Baker; Stephanie Lanza; Megan E Piper
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Internet-based group contingency management to promote abstinence from cigarette smoking: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Steven E Meredith; Michael J Grabinski; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Optimal carbon monoxide criteria to confirm 24-hr smoking abstinence.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Joshua L Karelitz; Nancy C Jao
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Mobile contingency management as an adjunctive smoking cessation treatment for smokers with posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Hertzberg; Vickie L Carpenter; Angela C Kirby; Patrick S Calhoun; Scott D Moore; Michelle F Dennis; Paul A Dennis; Eric A Dedert; Jean C Beckham
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN EXPIRED-AIR CARBON MONOXIDE MONITORS.

Authors:  Joshua L Karelitz; Valerie C Michael; Kenneth A Perkins
Journal:  J Smok Cessat       Date:  2016-02-02

10.  Varenicline versus transdermal nicotine patch for smoking cessation: results from a randomised open-label trial.

Authors:  H-J Aubin; A Bobak; J R Britton; C Oncken; C B Billing; J Gong; K E Williams; K R Reeves
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  8 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation smartphone application with a carbon monoxide checker.

Authors:  Katsunori Masaki; Hiroki Tateno; Akihiro Nomura; Tomoyasu Muto; Shin Suzuki; Kohta Satake; Eisuke Hida; Koichi Fukunaga
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-12

2.  Very Light Daily Smoking in Young Adults: Relationships Between Nicotine Dependence and Lapse.

Authors:  Melinda L Ashe; Stephen J Wilson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Mobile, Remote, and Individual Focused: Comparing Breath Carbon Monoxide Readings and Abstinence Between Smartphone-Enabled and Stand-Alone Monitors.

Authors:  Breanna M Tuck; Joshua L Karelitz; Rachel L Tomko; Jennifer Dahne; Patrick Cato; Erin A McClure
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  A Procedure to Standardize Puff Topography During Evaluations of Acute Tobacco or Electronic Cigarette Exposure.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Joshua L Karelitz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  A novel and remote biochemical verification method of smoking abstinence: Predictors of participant compliance.

Authors:  Johannes Thrul; Meredith C Meacham; Danielle E Ramo
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2018-05

6.  Lessons learned from unsuccessful use of personal carbon monoxide monitors to remotely assess abstinence in a pragmatic trial of a smartphone stop smoking app - A secondary analysis.

Authors:  Aleksandra Herbec; Jamie Brown; Lion Shahab; Robert West
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2018-07-23

7.  A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation smartphone application with a carbon monoxide checker.

Authors:  Katsunori Masaki; Hiroki Tateno; Akihiro Nomura; Tomoyasu Muto; Shin Suzuki; Kohta Satake; Eisuke Hida; Koichi Fukunaga
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-12

8.  Determining Optimal Cutoffs for Exhaled Carbon Monoxide and Salivary Cotinine to Identify Smokers among Korean Americans in a Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sun S Kim; Seongho Kim; Philimon N Gona
Journal:  J Smok Cessat       Date:  2021-02-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.