INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation is typically verified biochemically by expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) levels below 9 ppm (i.e., ≤8 ppm), but this CO criterion may lead many who have smoked within 24hr to be misclassified as abstinent. METHODS:Adult dependent smokers (N = 261; 124 men, 137 women) prospectively recorded each cigarette smoked and provided CO on five consecutive days during each of two short-term attempts to quit smoking. Participants were those recruited for crossover tests of the effects of placebo versus medication (nicotine patch or varenicline) on the ability to initiate 24-hr abstinence. All had either a high or low interest in permanently quitting smoking soon (within 3 months) and were randomized to the presence or absence of daily ($12) monetary reinforcement of abstinence. RESULTS:Total accuracy of sensitivity to detect smoking (83%) plus specificity to verify abstinence (87%) was optimal at a CO criterion for abstinence below 5 ppm (≤4 ppm), compared with below 9 ppm (sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 97%). Overall CO detection of sensitivity and specificity was higher in those with high versus low quit interest, but reinforcement of abstinence made no difference. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a CO criterion half that used in most clinical research may optimally validate 24-hr cessation and reduce misclassification of smokers as "abstinent."
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation is typically verified biochemically by expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) levels below 9 ppm (i.e., ≤8 ppm), but this CO criterion may lead many who have smoked within 24hr to be misclassified as abstinent. METHODS: Adult dependent smokers (N = 261; 124 men, 137 women) prospectively recorded each cigarette smoked and provided CO on five consecutive days during each of two short-term attempts to quit smoking. Participants were those recruited for crossover tests of the effects of placebo versus medication (nicotine patch or varenicline) on the ability to initiate 24-hr abstinence. All had either a high or low interest in permanently quitting smoking soon (within 3 months) and were randomized to the presence or absence of daily ($12) monetary reinforcement of abstinence. RESULTS: Total accuracy of sensitivity to detect smoking (83%) plus specificity to verify abstinence (87%) was optimal at a CO criterion for abstinence below 5 ppm (≤4 ppm), compared with below 9 ppm (sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 97%). Overall CO detection of sensitivity and specificity was higher in those with high versus low quit interest, but reinforcement of abstinence made no difference. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a CO criterion half that used in most clinical research may optimally validate 24-hr cessation and reduce misclassification of smokers as "abstinent."
Authors: J K Ockene; K M Emmons; R J Mermelstein; K A Perkins; D S Bonollo; C C Voorhees; J F Hollis Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Peter Gariti; Arthur I Alterman; Ronald Ehrman; Francis D Mulvaney; Charles P O'Brien Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Neal L Benowitz; John T Bernert; Ralph S Caraballo; David B Holiday; Jiantong Wang Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Amy L Cole; Mary Schmidt-Owens; Ashley C Beavis; Christine F Chong; Patrick M Tarwater; James Schaus; Michael G Deichen; Alexander M Cole Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Lorra Garey; Kara Manning; Danielle E McCarthy; Matthew W Gallagher; Justin M Shepherd; Michael F Orr; Norman B Schmidt; Blaz Rodic; Michael J Zvolensky Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Pamela Valera; F Joseph McClernon; Greer Burkholder; Michael J Mugavero; James Willig; Conall O'Cleirigh; Karen L Cropsey Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-07
Authors: Samantha G Farris; Teresa M Leyro; Nicholas P Allan; Camilla S Øverup; Norman B Schmidt; Michael J Zvolensky Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2016-08-03