Literature DB >> 27927422

Radiographic Outcomes of Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Critical Analysis of Variability and Failures Across Deformity Patterns.

Bertrand Moal1, Frank Schwab2, Christopher P Ames3, Justin S Smith4, Devon Ryan2, Praveen V Mummaneni3, Gregory M Mundis5, Jamie S Terran2, Eric Klineberg6, Robert A Hart7, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei8, Christopher I Shaffrey4, Wafa Skalli9, Virginie Lafage10.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, consecutive, surgical case series from the International Spine Study Group.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatment in restoring spinopelvic (SP) alignment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pain and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity have been correlated with global coronal alignment (GCA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence/lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), and pelvic tilt (PT). One of the main goals of surgery for adult spinal deformity is to correct these parameters to restore harmonious SP alignment.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were operative patients (age greater than 18 years) with baseline (BL) and 1-year full-length X-rays. Thoracic and thoracolumbar Cobb angle and previous mentioned parameters were calculated. Each parameter at BL and 1 year was categorized as either pathological or normal. Pathologic limits were: Cobb greater than 30°, GCA greater than 40 mm, SVA greater than 40 mm, PI-LL greater than 10°, and PT greater than 20°. According to thresholds, corrected or worsened alignment groups of patients were identified and overall radiographic effectiveness of procedure was evaluated by combining the results from the coronal and sagittal planes.
RESULTS: A total of 161 patients (age, 55 ± 15 years) were included. At BL, 80% of patients had a Cobb angle greater than 30°, 25% had a GCA greater than 40 mm, and 42% to 58% had a pathological sagittal parameter of PI-LL, SVA, and/or PT. Sagittal deformity was corrected in about 50% of cases for patients with pathological SVA or PI-LL, whereas PT was most commonly worsened (24%) and least often corrected (24%). Only 23% of patients experienced complete radiographic correction of the deformity.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of inadequate SP correction was high. Pelvic tilt was the parameter least likely to be well corrected. The high rate of SP alignment failure emphasizes the need for better preoperative planning and intraoperative imaging. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Radiographic effectiveness; SRS–Schwab classification; Surgical treatment; spinopelvic alignment

Year:  2014        PMID: 27927422     DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  11 in total

1.  Sequential correction technique to avoid postoperative global coronal decompensation in rigid adult spinal deformity: a technical note and preliminary results.

Authors:  Hongda Bao; Zhen Liu; Yuancheng Zhang; Xu Sun; Jun Jiang; Bangping Qian; Saihu Mao; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A new nomenclature system for the surgical treatment of cervical spine deformity, developing, and validation of SOF system.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Heiko Koller; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Wen Yuan; Asdrubal Falavigna; Ho Jin Lee; Jong Beom Lee; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Jong-Hyeok Park; Il Sup Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Self-learning computers for surgical planning and prediction of postoperative alignment.

Authors:  Renaud Lafage; Sébastien Pesenti; Virginie Lafage; Frank J Schwab
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Systemic Risk Factors for Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD): A Retrospective Analysis of 48 Patients.

Authors:  Nicholas Dietz; Peter Hollis; Enzo Fortuny; Basil Gruter; Justin Virojanapa; Brian Williams; Alexander Spiessberger
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-22

Review 5.  Osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformities: indications, classification, and surgical planning.

Authors:  Bassel Diebo; Shian Liu; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-11

6.  Preliminary experience with SpineEOS, a new software for 3D planning in AIS surgery.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Ferrero; Keyvan Mazda; Anne-Laure Simon; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Full-Body Radiographic Analysis of Postoperative Deviations From Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction and Related Compensatory Recruitment.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Cyrus M Jalai; Bassel G Diebo; Dana L Cruz; Gregory W Poorman; Aaron J Buckland; Louis M Day; Samantha R Horn; Barthélemy Liabaud; Renaud Lafage; Alexandra Soroceanu; Joseph F Baker; Shearwood McClelland; Jonathan H Oren; Thomas J Errico; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

8.  Trends in Intraoperative Assessment of Spinal Alignment: A Survey of Spine Surgeons in the United States.

Authors:  David M Gullotti; Amir H Soltanianzadeh; Saki Fujita; Miguel Inserni; Edward Ruppel; Nicholas G Franconi; Corinna Zygourakis; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Sheng-Fu Larry Lo; Daniel M Sciubba; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04

9.  In the Relationship Between Change in Kyphosis and Change in Lordosis: Which Drives Which?

Authors:  Bryan Ang; Renaud Lafage; Jonathan Charles Elysée; Tejbir S Pannu; Mathieu Bannwarth; Brandon B Carlson; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-04-01

10.  Optimal Correction of Adult Spinal Deformities Requires Restoration of Distal Lumbar Lordosis.

Authors:  S Pesenti; S Prost; A Muñoz McCausland; K Farah; P Tropiano; S Fuentes; B Blondel
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.