Literature DB >> 27926975

Large for Gestational Age Infants and Adverse Outcomes among Uncomplicated Pregnancies at Term.

Hector Mendez-Figueroa1, Van Thi Thanh Truong2, Claudia Pedroza2, Suneet P Chauhan1.   

Abstract

Background While traumatic delivery with large for gestational age (LGA; birth weight above 90%) is acknowledged, there is paucity of data regarding other morbidity and mortality associated with LGA. Our hypothesis was that compared with appropriate for gestational age (AGA), LGA have a significantly higher rate of composite neonatal morbidity (CNM). Objective Our objective was to compare the CNM among uncomplicated LGA versus AGA at term (37 weeks or more) among all available Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) databases. We excluded women who delivered before 37 weeks, those with hypertension or diabetes, multiple gestations, and known anomalies, and those with birth weight less than 10% for GA. Using multivariable analysis, we compared the CNM between LGA and AGA. Random-effect logistic regressions were used to account for study heterogeneity, with adjustment for potential confounders. We calculated adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Approximately 60% (n = 50,734) of all participants met inclusion criteria. Among uncomplicated pregnancies, the rate of LGA was 12.1%. The rate of CNM was 15% in LGA and 10% in AGA (aOR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.46-1.70). The likelihood of stillbirth and neonatal mortality was similar among both groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that CNM was increased among both birth weight > 95% and birth weight 90 to 95% and at different GA at delivery. Conclusion Among uncomplicated pregnancies at term, LGA newborns, compared with AGA, have a significantly higher likelihood of CNM but similar stillbirth and neonatal death risk. Trials are warranted to determine appropriate management of LGA to decrease these risks. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27926975     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  10 in total

1.  Exposure to Persistent Organic Pollutants and Birth Characteristics: The Upstate KIDS Study.

Authors:  Griffith A Bell; Neil Perkins; Germaine M Buck Louis; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Erin M Bell; Chongjing Gao; Edwina H Yeung
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Development of an imputation model to recalibrate birth weights measured in the early neonatal period to time at delivery and assessment of its impact on size-for-gestational age and low birthweight prevalence estimates: a secondary analysis of a pregnancy cohort in rural Nepal.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hazel; Luke C Mullany; Scott L Zeger; Diwakar Mohan; Seema Subedi; James M Tielsch; Subarna K Khatry; Joanne Katz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Large-for-gestational age and stillbirth: is there a role for antenatal testing?

Authors:  E B Carter; J Stockburger; M G Tuuli; G A Macones; A O Odibo; A S Trudell
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 4.  Adiponectin as a Potential Biomarker for Pregnancy Disorders.

Authors:  Carmen Pheiffer; Stephanie Dias; Babalwa Jack; Nompumelelo Malaza; Sumaiya Adam
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Demographic, socio-economic, obstetric, and behavioral factors associated with small-and large-for-gestational-age from a prospective, population-based pregnancy cohort in rural Nepal: a secondary data analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hazel; Diwakar Mohan; Scott Zeger; Luke C Mullany; James M Tielsch; Subarna K Khatry; Seema Subedi; Steven C LeClerq; Robert E Black; Joanne Katz
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.105

6.  Novel epigenetic link between gestational diabetes mellitus and macrosomia.

Authors:  Brian T Joyce; Huikun Liu; Leishen Wang; Jun Wang; Yinan Zheng; Drew Nannini; Alex Drong; Stephanie Shiau; Weiqin Li; Junhong Leng; Yun Shen; Ru Gao; Andrea Baccarelli; Gang Hu; Lifang Hou
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Characteristics of Stillbirths Associated With Diabetes in a Diverse U.S. Cohort.

Authors:  Jessica M Page; Amanda A Allshouse; Irina Cassimatis; Marcela C Smid; Erol Arslan; Vanessa Thorsten; Corette Parker; Michael W Varner; Donald J Dudley; George R Saade; Robert L Goldenberg; Barbara J Stoll; Carol J Hogue; Radek Bukowski; Deborah Conway; Halit Pinar; Uma M Reddy; Robert M Silver
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.623

8.  External validation and clinical usefulness of first-trimester prediction models for small- and large-for-gestational-age infants: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lje Meertens; Ljm Smits; Smj van Kuijk; R Aardenburg; Ima van Dooren; J Langenveld; I M Zwaan; Mea Spaanderman; Hcj Scheepers
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  A first trimester prediction model for large for gestational age infants: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Francesca Monari; Daniela Menichini; Ludovica Spano' Bascio; Giovanni Grandi; Federico Banchelli; Isabella Neri; Roberto D'Amico; Fabio Facchinetti
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Cohort profile: the MUNICH Preterm and Term Clinical study (MUNICH-PreTCl), a neonatal birth cohort with focus on prenatal and postnatal determinants of infant and childhood morbidity.

Authors:  Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Orsolya Genzel-Boroviczény; Wolfgang Emanuel Bodensohn; Robin Eisenburger; Janne Scharpenack; Philipp E Geyer; Johannes B Müller-Reif; Nadja van Hagen; Alina M Müller; Majken Karoline Jensen; Christoph Klein; Matthias Mann; Claudia Nussbaum
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.