OBJECTIVES: The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) provides a reproducible assessment of the status of coronary microvasculature in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) enables detailed assessment of the morphology of coronary plaque.We sought to determine the influence of the initial culprit coronary plaque anatomy within the infarct-related artery on IMR after stenting in STEMI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 25 STEMI patients IMR was measured immediately before and after stent implantation. FD-OCT imaging was performed at the same time points and atherothrombotic volume (ATV) before stenting, prolapsed+floating ATV after stenting and ΔATV was measured using three different strategies. RESULTS: There were no relationships between preprocedural IMR and FD-OCT parameters. Prestenting IMR was related only to pain to wire time (P: 0.02). Irrespective of the method adopted, the final IMR was related to prestenting ATV (ρ: 0.44, P: 0.03 for method I, ρ: 0.48, P: 0.02 for method II and ρ: 0.30, P: 0.06 for method III) and ΔATV (ρ: 0.41, P: 0.04 for method II and ρ: 0.44, P: 0.03 for method III). CONCLUSION: IMR measured before stenting is independent of the appearances of the culprit coronary plaque within the infarct-related artery. IMR after stenting, and more importantly, the change in IMR after stenting, reflect the degree of distal embolization during stent implantation.
OBJECTIVES: The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) provides a reproducible assessment of the status of coronary microvasculature in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) enables detailed assessment of the morphology of coronary plaque.We sought to determine the influence of the initial culprit coronary plaque anatomy within the infarct-related artery on IMR after stenting in STEMI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 25 STEMI patients IMR was measured immediately before and after stent implantation. FD-OCT imaging was performed at the same time points and atherothrombotic volume (ATV) before stenting, prolapsed+floating ATV after stenting and ΔATV was measured using three different strategies. RESULTS: There were no relationships between preprocedural IMR and FD-OCT parameters. Prestenting IMR was related only to pain to wire time (P: 0.02). Irrespective of the method adopted, the final IMR was related to prestenting ATV (ρ: 0.44, P: 0.03 for method I, ρ: 0.48, P: 0.02 for method II and ρ: 0.30, P: 0.06 for method III) and ΔATV (ρ: 0.41, P: 0.04 for method II and ρ: 0.44, P: 0.03 for method III). CONCLUSION: IMR measured before stenting is independent of the appearances of the culprit coronary plaque within the infarct-related artery. IMR after stenting, and more importantly, the change in IMR after stenting, reflect the degree of distal embolization during stent implantation.
Authors: Paul Sorajja; Bernard J Gersh; Costantino Costantini; Michael G McLaughlin; Peter Zimetbaum; David A Cox; Eulogio Garcia; James E Tcheng; Roxana Mehran; Alexandra J Lansky; David E Kandzari; Cindy L Grines; Gregg W Stone Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-02-25 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Italo Porto; Joseph B Selvanayagam; William J Van Gaal; Francesco Prati; Adrian Cheng; Keith Channon; Stefan Neubauer; Adrian P Banning Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-08-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Andy S C Yong; Michael Ho; Maulik G Shah; Martin K C Ng; William F Fearon Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Ross McGeoch; Stuart Watkins; Colin Berry; Tracey Steedman; Andrew Davie; John Byrne; Stewart Hillis; Mitchell Lindsay; Stephen Robb; Henry Dargie; Keith Oldroyd Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Gregor Fahrni; Mohammad Alkhalil; Florim Cuculi; Sam Dawkins; Mathias Wolfrum; Robin P Choudhury; John C Forfar; Bernard D Prendergast; Tuncay Yetgin; Robert Jan van Geuns; Matteo Tebaldi; Keith M Channon; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Peter M Rothwell; Marco Valgimigli; Adrian P Banning Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2016-11-20 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Yoshinobu Onuma; Leif Thuesen; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Martin van der Ent; Steffen Desch; Jean Fajadet; Evald Christiansen; Peter Smits; Niels Ramsing Holm; Evelyn Regar; Nicolas van Mieghem; Vladimir Borovicanin; Dragica Paunovic; Kazuhisa Senshu; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Takashi Muramatsu; Il-Soo Lee; Gerhard Schuler; Felix Zijlstra; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Patrick W Serruys Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: William F Fearon; Adrian F Low; Andy S Yong; Ross McGeoch; Colin Berry; Maulik G Shah; Michael Y Ho; Hyun-Sook Kim; Joshua P Loh; Keith G Oldroyd Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Florim Cuculi; Niket Patel; Sam Dawkins; Gregor Fahrni; George Kassimis; Robin P Choudhury; John C Forfar; Bernard D Prendergast; Keith M Channon; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Adrian P Banning Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 29.983