Literature DB >> 20650433

The index of microcirculatory resistance measured acutely predicts the extent and severity of myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Ross McGeoch1, Stuart Watkins, Colin Berry, Tracey Steedman, Andrew Davie, John Byrne, Stewart Hillis, Mitchell Lindsay, Stephen Robb, Henry Dargie, Keith Oldroyd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the relationship between the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) with myocardial injury and microvascular obstruction (MVO) assessed by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (ceCMR) imaging in a broad range of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for assessment of microvascular obstruction (MVO), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, and infarct volumes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, ceCMR is not available acutely. The index of microcirculatory resistance is a simple invasive measure of microvascular function available at the time of emergency PCI. We investigated the relationship between IMR with myocardial injury and MVO assessed by ceCMR in STEMI patients undergoing emergency PCI.
METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with STEMI were included and 53 (93%) and 47 (82%) patients had complete ceCMR scans 2 days and 3 months following MI, respectively. Microvascular obstruction was defined as a dark core of hypoenhancement within the area of hyperenhanced infarct tissue 10 to 15 min following intravenous gadolinium (0.1 mmol/kg).
RESULTS: The median IMR (interquartile range [IQR]) was 35 (24 to 63) U. Twenty-seven patients (46%) had MVO. We found that IMR (median [IQR]) was higher in patients with MVO (38 [29 to 55] U) than in patients without MVO (27 [18 to 36] U); p = 0.003). The index of microcirculatory resistance was a negative multivariable predictor of LV ejection fraction, (p < or = 0.001) and infarct volume (p = 0.01) on the ceCMR scan 2 days after MI, and IMR was a multivariable predictor of LV ejection fraction (p = 0.028) and infarct volume (p = 0.048) at 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The index of microcirculatory resistance measured acutely was higher in patients with MVO on ceCMR, and IMR independently predicted LV function and infarct volume. This easily measured physiological parameter provides important prognostic information at the time of emergency PCI. Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20650433     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  52 in total

Review 1.  Intravascular imaging tools in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: comprehensive assessment of anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Parham Eshtehardi; Jennifer Luke; Michael C McDaniel; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Targeting the dominant mechanism of coronary microvascular dysfunction with intracoronary physiology tests.

Authors:  Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Nina van der Hoeven; Tim P van de Hoef; Julius Heemelaar; Nicola Ryan; Amir Lerman; Niels van Royen; Javier Escaned
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  The influence of coronary plaque morphology assessed by optical coherence tomography on final microvascular function after stenting in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Giovanni L De Maria; Niket Patel; Mathias Wolfrum; Gregor Fahrni; George Kassimis; Italo Porto; Sam Dawkins; Robin P Choudhury; John C Forfar; Bernard D Prendergast; Keith M Channon; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.439

Review 4.  Role of coronary physiology in the contemporary management of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Neil Ruparelia; Rajesh K Kharbanda
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Prognostic value and clinical predictors of intramyocardial hemorrhage measured by CMR T2* sequences in STEMI.

Authors:  Maria Ferré-Vallverdú; Elena Sánchez-Lacuesta; Diego Plaza-López; José Luis Díez-Gil; Pilar Sepúlveda-Sanchis; Carolina Gil-Cayuela; Alicia Maceira-Gonzalez; Vicente Miró-Palau; Anastasio Montero-Argudo; Luis Martínez-Dolz; Begoña Igual-Muñoz
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Karim D Mahmoud; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Presence of Microvascular Dysfunction and CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Patients with ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Ragab A Mahfouz; Marwa M Gad; Mohamed Arab; Moei-E Deen Abulfotouh
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26

8.  Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance.

Authors:  Zhiming Wu; Fei Ye; Wei You; Junjie Zhang; Dujiang Xie; Shaoliang Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Assessment and pathophysiology of microvascular disease: recent progress and clinical implications.

Authors:  Stefano Masi; Damiano Rizzoni; Stefano Taddei; Robert Jay Widmer; Augusto C Montezano; Thomas F Lüscher; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Rhian M Touyz; Francesco Paneni; Amir Lerman; Gaetano A Lanza; Agostino Virdis
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Prognostic value of the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  William F Fearon; Adrian F Low; Andy S Yong; Ross McGeoch; Colin Berry; Maulik G Shah; Michael Y Ho; Hyun-Sook Kim; Joshua P Loh; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.