Literature DB >> 27926441

A benefit-cost framework of motivation for a specific activity.

B Studer1, S Knecht2.   

Abstract

How can an individual be motivated to perform a target exercise or activity? This question arises in training, therapeutic, and education settings alike, yet despite-or even because of-the large range of extant motivation theories, finding a clear answer to this question can be challenging. Here we propose an application-friendly framework of motivation for a specific activity or exercise that incorporates core concepts from several well-regarded psychological and economic theories of motivation. The key assumption of this framework is that motivation for performing a given activity is determined by the expected benefits and the expected costs of (performance of) the activity. Benefits comprise positive feelings, gains, and rewards experienced during performance of the activity (intrinsic benefits) or achieved through the activity (extrinsic benefits). Costs entail effort requirements, time demands, and other expenditure (intrinsic costs) as well as unwanted associated outcomes and missing out on alternative activities (extrinsic costs). The expected benefits and costs of a given exercise are subjective and state dependent. We discuss convergence of the proposed framework with a selection of extant motivation theories and briefly outline neurobiological correlates of its main components and assumptions. One particular strength of our framework is that it allows to specify five pathways to increasing motivation for a target exercise, which we illustrate and discuss with reference to previous empirical data.
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Benefit; Costs; Effort; Exercise; Motivation; Value

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27926441     DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  7 in total

1.  Negative schizotypal traits predict the reduction of reward motivation in effort-reward imbalance.

Authors:  Yong-Jie Yan; Hui-Xin Hu; Ling-Ling Wang; Yi-Jing Zhang; Simon S Y Lui; Jia Huang; Raymond C K Chan
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Inverted U-Shaped Curvilinear Relationship between Challenge and One's Intrinsic Motivation: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Qingguo Ma; Guanxiong Pei; Liang Meng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Inducing illusory control ensures persistence when rewards fade and when others outperform us.

Authors:  Bettina Studer; Shawn N Geniole; Maike L Becker; Christoph Eisenegger; Stefan Knecht
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

4.  Conquering the inner couch potato: precommitment is an effective strategy to enhance motivation for effortful actions.

Authors:  Bettina Studer; Carolin Koch; Stefan Knecht; Tobias Kalenscher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A decision-neuroscientific intervention to improve cognitive recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Bettina Studer; Alicja Timm; Barbara J Sahakian; Tobias Kalenscher; Stefan Knecht
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mario Widmer; Jeremia P O Held; Frieder Wittmann; Belen Valladares; Olivier Lambercy; Christian Sturzenegger; Antonella Palla; Kai Lutz; Andreas R Luft
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Understanding Players' Sportspersonship Attitude, Expectancy-Related Beliefs, and Subjective Task Values in Field Hockey: An Integrated Approach.

Authors:  Kanagarajah Rarujanai; Eng Wah Teo; Chin Ngien Siong; Arthur Ling; Garry Kuan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.