Samuel Chang1, Anthony C Lanctot1, Martin D McCarter2, Katherine M Roberts3, Deborah H Glueck3, Gerald D Dodd1. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 2. 2 Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 3. 3 Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the most reliable predictor of radiofrequency (RF) ablation zone volume among three-dimensional (3D) volumetric colour Doppler vascular indices in an in vitro blood-perfused bovine liver model. METHODS: 3D colour Doppler volume data of the local hepatic parenchyma were acquired from 37 areas of 13 bovine livers connected to an in vitro oxygenated blood perfusion system. Doppler vascular indices of vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) were obtained from the volume data using 3D volume analysis software. 37 RF ablations were performed at the same locations where the ultrasound data were obtained from. The relationship of these vascular indices and the ablation zone volumes measured from gross specimens were analyzed using a general linear mixed model fit with random effect for liver and backward stepwise regression analysis. RESULTS: FI was significantly associated with ablation zone volumes measured on gross specimens (p = 0.0047), but explained little of the variance (Rβ2 = 0.21). Ablation zone volume decreased by 0.23 cm3 (95% confidence interval: -0.38, -0.08) for every 1 increase in FI. Neither VI nor VFI was significantly associated with ablation zone volumes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although FI was associated with ablation zone volumes, it could not sufficiently explain their variability, limiting its clinical applicability. VI, FI and VFI are not clinically useful in the prediction of RF ablation zone volume in the liver. Advances in knowledge: Despite a significant association of FI with ablation zone volumes, VI, FI and VFI cannot be used for their prediction. Different Doppler vascular indices need to be investigated for clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the most reliable predictor of radiofrequency (RF) ablation zone volume among three-dimensional (3D) volumetric colour Doppler vascular indices in an in vitro blood-perfused bovine liver model. METHODS: 3D colour Doppler volume data of the local hepatic parenchyma were acquired from 37 areas of 13 bovine livers connected to an in vitro oxygenated blood perfusion system. Doppler vascular indices of vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) were obtained from the volume data using 3D volume analysis software. 37 RF ablations were performed at the same locations where the ultrasound data were obtained from. The relationship of these vascular indices and the ablation zone volumes measured from gross specimens were analyzed using a general linear mixed model fit with random effect for liver and backward stepwise regression analysis. RESULTS: FI was significantly associated with ablation zone volumes measured on gross specimens (p = 0.0047), but explained little of the variance (Rβ2 = 0.21). Ablation zone volume decreased by 0.23 cm3 (95% confidence interval: -0.38, -0.08) for every 1 increase in FI. Neither VI nor VFI was significantly associated with ablation zone volumes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although FI was associated with ablation zone volumes, it could not sufficiently explain their variability, limiting its clinical applicability. VI, FI and VFI are not clinically useful in the prediction of RF ablation zone volume in the liver. Advances in knowledge: Despite a significant association of FI with ablation zone volumes, VI, FI and VFI cannot be used for their prediction. Different Doppler vascular indices need to be investigated for clinical use.
Authors: Michael D Orsi; Gerald D Dodd; Rex A Cardan; Hayden W Head; Stephanie K Burns; Dana Blakemore; Jeffrey Blume; Tyler J Green Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: S B Chinn; F T Lee; G D Kennedy; C Chinn; C D Johnson; T C Winter; T F Warner; D M Mahvi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: W P Martins; J C Lima; A W Welsh; E Araujo Júnior; E Araujo; A H Miyague; F M Filho; N J Raine-Fenning Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: David S K Lu; Steven S Raman; Piyaporn Limanond; Donya Aziz; James Economou; Ronald Busuttil; James Sayre Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Richard S Montgomery; Andres Rahal; Gerald D Dodd; John R Leyendecker; Linda G Hubbard Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.959