Literature DB >> 27925381

Doctors' use of mobile devices in the clinical setting: a mixed methods study.

Arany Nerminathan1, Amanda Harrison2, Megan Phelps3, Shirley Alexander4, Karen M Scott5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile device use has become almost ubiquitous in daily life and therefore includes use by doctors in clinical settings. There has been little study as to the patterns of use and impact this has on doctors in the workplace and how negatively or positively it impacts at the point of care. AIM: To explore how doctors use mobile devices in the clinical setting and understand drivers for use.
METHODS: A mixed methods study was used with doctors in a paediatric and adult teaching hospital in 2013. A paper-based survey examined mobile device usage data by doctors in the clinical setting. Focus groups explored doctors' reasons for using or refraining from using mobile devices in the clinical setting, and their attitudes about others' use.
RESULTS: The survey, completed by 109 doctors, showed that 91% owned a smartphone and 88% used their mobile devices frequently in the clinical setting. Trainees were more likely than consultants to use their mobile devices for learning and accessing information related to patient care, as well as for personal communication unrelated to work. Focus group data highlighted a range of factors that influenced doctors to use personal mobile devices in the clinical setting, including convenience for medical photography, and factors that limited use. Distraction in the clinical setting due to use of mobile devices was a key issue. Personal experience and confidence in using mobile devices affected their use, and was guided by role modelling and expectations within a medical team.
CONCLUSION: Doctors use mobile devices to enhance efficiency in the workplace. In the current environment, doctors are making their own decisions based on balancing the risks and benefits of using mobile devices in the clinical setting. There is a need for guidelines around acceptable and ethical use that is patient-centred and that respects patient privacy.
© 2016 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  m-learning; mobile devices; mobile learning; mobile phones; mobile technology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27925381     DOI: 10.1111/imj.13349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med J        ISSN: 1444-0903            Impact factor:   2.048


  16 in total

1.  Development and Usage of eContour, a Novel, Three-Dimensional, Image-Based Web Site to Facilitate Access to Contouring Guidelines at the Point of Care.

Authors:  Michael V Sherer; Diana Lin; Kartikeya Puri; Neil Panjwani; Zhigang Zhang; James D Murphy; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-10

2.  Medical Photography Usage Amongst Doctors at a Portuguese Hospital.

Authors:  Mariana Cura; Hélio Alves; José Paulo Andrade
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Early clinical management of severe burn patients using telemedicine: a pilot study protocol.

Authors:  Maxim Moreau; Guy Paré
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-07-04

Review 4.  Hospital Bring-Your-Own-Device Security Challenges and Solutions: Systematic Review of Gray Literature.

Authors:  Tafheem Ahmad Wani; Antonette Mendoza; Kathleen Gray
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Are Austrian practitioners ready to use medical apps? Results of a validation study.

Authors:  Fanni Hofer; Daniela Haluza
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Influence of Organizational Issues on Nurse Administrators' Support to Staff Nurses' Use of Smartphones for Work Purposes in the Philippines: Focus Group Study.

Authors:  John Robert Bautista; Trisha T C Lin; Yin-Leng Theng
Journal:  JMIR Nurs       Date:  2020-01-10

7.  Mobile phones of paediatric hospital staff are never cleaned and commonly used in toilets with implications for healthcare nosocomial diseases.

Authors:  Matthew Olsen; Anna Lohning; Mariana Campos; Peter Jones; Simon McKirdy; Rashed Alghafri; Lotti Tajouri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Christine Jacob; Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez; Chris Ivory
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 9.  Mobile phones represent a pathway for microbial transmission: A scoping review.

Authors:  Matthew Olsen; Mariana Campos; Anna Lohning; Peter Jones; John Legget; Alexandra Bannach-Brown; Simon McKirdy; Rashed Alghafri; Lotti Tajouri
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 20.441

10.  Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of a Clinical Photo Documentation App and its Implications for Clinical Workflows and Quality of Care: Qualitative Case Study.

Authors:  Christine Jacob; Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez; Chris Ivory
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.