Literature DB >> 27925287

Treatment Sequence Matters: Anabolic and Antiresorptive Therapy for Osteoporosis.

Felicia Cosman1,2, Jeri W Nieves1,3, David W Dempster1,4.   

Abstract

The effects of anabolic medications (teriparatide [TPTD] and parathyroid hormone [PTH]) differ in patients who have received recent treatment with potent antiresorptives. This perspective reviews studies evaluating bone density (BMD) and histomorphometric effects of treatment sequences beginning with TPTD/PTH followed by potent antiresorptives and those beginning with potent antiresorptives followed by switching to or adding TPTD. Effect of treatment sequence on spine BMD outcome is minor, with modest quantitative differences. However, when individuals established on potent bisphosphonates are switched to TPTD, hip BMD declines below baseline for at least the first 12 months after the switch to TPTD. This transient hip BMD loss is more prominent when the antiresorptive is denosumab; in this setting, hip BMD remains below baseline for almost a full 24 months. In a controlled comparison of those who switched from alendronate to TPTD versus those who added TPTD to ongoing alendronate, the effect on hip BMD was improved with combination therapy. Furthermore, hip strength improved with the addition of TPTD to ongoing alendronate, whereas it was neutral after switching from alendronate to TPTD, primarily due to the effect on cortical bone. Bone biopsy studies indicate that TPTD stimulates bone formation in patients who have not been treated previously as well as in patients on prior and ongoing bisphosphonates. Histomorphometric evidence suggests that use of alendronate with TPTD blocks the TPTD-induced increase in cortical porosity. When possible, we suggest anabolic therapy first, followed by potent antiresorptive therapy. The common practice of switching to TPTD only after patients have an inadequate response to antiresorptives (intercurrent fracture or inadequate BMD effect) is not the optimal utilization of anabolic treatment. In fact, this may result in transient loss of hip BMD and strength. In this setting, continuing a potent antiresorptive while starting TPTD might improve hip outcomes.
© 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANABOLIC; ANTIRESORPTIVE; BONE DENSITY; TERIPARATIDE; TREATMENT SEQUENCE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27925287     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  51 in total

Review 1.  The next step after anti-osteoporotic drug discontinuation: an up-to-date review of sequential treatment.

Authors:  Núria Guañabens; María Jesús Moro-Álvarez; Enrique Casado; Josep Blanch-Rubió; Carlos Gómez-Alonso; Guillermo Martínez Díaz-Guerra; Javier Del Pino-Montes; Carmen Valero Díaz de Lamadrid; Pilar Peris; Manuel Muñoz-Torres
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Current Status of Bone-Forming Therapies for the Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling; Torben Harsløf; Bente Langdahl
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Comparison of Teriparatide and Denosumab in Patients Switching From Long-Term Bisphosphonate Use.

Authors:  Houchen Lyu; Sizheng S Zhao; Kazuki Yoshida; Sara K Tedeschi; Chang Xu; Sagar U Nigwekar; Benjamin Z Leder; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  Osteoanabolic and dual action drugs.

Authors:  Gaia Tabacco; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  MMP14 is a novel target of PTH signaling in osteocytes that controls resorption by regulating soluble RANKL production.

Authors:  Jesus Delgado-Calle; Benjamin Hancock; Elive F Likine; Amy Y Sato; Kevin McAndrews; Carolina Sanudo; Angela Bruzzaniti; Jose A Riancho; James R Tonra; Teresita Bellido
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 7.  Using Osteoporosis Therapies in Combination.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Eben G Estell; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 9.  New anabolic therapies for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Salvatore Minisola; Cristiana Cipriani; Marco Occhiuto; Jessica Pepe
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 10.  Sclerostin: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Sakae Tanaka; Toshio Matsumoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.