Literature DB >> 27924386

Cost analysis of laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Aldo Garbarini1, Dario Reggio2, Simone Arolfo1, Marco Bruno1, Roberto Passera1, Giorgia Catalano2, Claudio Barletti3, Mauro Salizzoni2, Mario Morino1, Luca Petruzzelli4, Alberto Arezzo5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence from controlled trials and meta-analyses suggests that laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV) is preferable to sequential treatment in the management of common bile duct stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With this retrospective analysis of a prospective database that included consecutive patients treated for cholecystocholedocholithiasis at our institution between January 2007 and July 2015, we compared LERV with sequential treatment. The primary endpoint was global cost, defined as the cost/patient/hospital stay, and the secondary end points were efficacy and morbidity. Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney test was used.
RESULTS: Of a total of 249 consecutive patients, 143 underwent LERV (group A) and 106 a two-stage procedure (group B). Based on an average cost of €613 for 1 day of hospital stay in the General Surgery Department, the overall median cost of treatment was €6403 for group A and €8194 for group B (p < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay was significantly longer for group B (p < 0.001). No mortality in either group was observed. The postoperative complications rate was significantly higher in group B than in group A (24.5 vs. 10.5%; p = 0.003). No significant difference in the postoperative pancreatitis rate or the number of patients with increased serum amylase at 24 h was observed in either group.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that LERV is preferable to sequential treatment not only in terms of less morbidity, but also of lower costs accrued by a shorter hospital stay. However, the longer operative time raises multiple organizational issues in the coordination of surgery and endoscopy services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common bile duct stones; ERCP; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Rendezvous technique

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27924386     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5361-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Selective operative cholangiography and Perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a viable option for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  G L Williams; K D Vellacott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Optimal surgical technique, use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and management of acute gallbladder disease: the results of a nation-wide survey in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  P Sanjay; C Kulli; F M Polignano; I S Tait
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ.

Authors:  E S J Clayton; S Connor; N Alexakis; E Leandros
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Laparoendoscopic rendezvous reduces perioperative morbidity and risk of pancreatitis.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Federico Famiglietti; Lorenzo Moja; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  NIH Consensus conference. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Combined endoscopic treatment for cholelithiasis associated with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  G Saccomani; V Durante; M R Magnolia; L Ghezzo; R Lombezzi; L Esercizio; M Stella; A Arezzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; E Lezoche; M Morino; E Croce; A Lacy; J Toouli; A Faggioni; V M Ribeiro; J Jakimowicz; J Visa; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Ding; FuCheng Zhang; YaoJun Wang
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.392

10.  Laparo-endoscopic "rendezvous": a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment.

Authors:  E Cavina; M Franceschi; F Sidoti; O Goletti; P Buccianti; M Chiarugi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Destiny for Rendezvous: Is Cholecysto/Choledocholithiasis Better Treated with Dual- or Single-Step Procedures?

Authors:  S Vaccari; M Minghetti; A Lauro; M I Bellini; A Ussia; S Khouzam; I R Marino; M Cervellera; V D'Andrea; V Tonini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Direct medical cost and cost analysis of COVID-19 in Iran: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Seyed Hadi Mirhashemi; Hakimeh Mostafavi; Fariba Mollajafari; Zohreh Zadeh Ahmad; Reza Hashempour
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2022-03-24

3.  Postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Eva-Lena Syrén; Gabriel Sandblom; Staffan Eriksson; Arne Eklund; Bengt Isaksson; Lars Enochsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.