Literature DB >> 27924308

pH-Sensitive Pt Nanocluster Assembly Overcomes Cisplatin Resistance and Heterogeneous Stemness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hongping Xia1, Fangyuan Li2, Xi Hu3, Wooram Park4, Shuaifei Wang3, Youngjin Jang5, Yang Du3, Seungmin Baik5, Soojeong Cho4, Taegyu Kang5, Dong-Hyun Kim6, Daishun Ling2, Kam Man Hui7, Taeghwan Hyeon5.   

Abstract

Response rates to conventional chemotherapeutics remain unsatisfactory for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to the high rates of chemoresistance and recurrence. Tumor-initiating cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) are refractory to chemotherapy, and their enrichment leads to subsequent development of chemoresistance and recurrence. To overcome the chemoresistance and stemness in HCC, we synthesized a Pt nanocluster assembly (Pt-NA) composed of assembled Pt nanoclusters incorporating a pH-sensitive polymer and HCC-targeting peptide. Pt-NA is latent in peripheral blood, readily targets disseminated HCC CSLCs, and disassembles into small Pt nanoclusters in acidic subcellular compartments, eventually inducing damage to DNA. Furthermore, treatment with Pt-NA downregulates a multitude of genes that are vital for the proliferation of HCC. Importantly, CD24+ side population (SP) CSLCs that are resistant to cisplatin are sensitive to Pt-NA, demonstrating the immense potential of Pt-NA for treating chemoresistant HCC.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27924308      PMCID: PMC5126722          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-associated death worldwide.[1] Most HCC patients are inherently resistant to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs.[2] Currently, sorafenib is the only FDA-approved target therapy drug (since 2007) for advanced HCC which increases progression-free survival by a dismal three months compared to placebo. Recently, the adjuvant sorafenib for HCC failed in a phase III, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial.[3] Therefore, the development of more effective therapeutic strategies is much needed. Moreover, treating HCC with ineffective chemotherapeutics leads to the enrichment of a rare subpopulation of tumor-initiating cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs).[4] It has been reported that resistance to cisplatin is associated with the enrichment of CSLCs in ovarian,[5] lung,[6] and liver cancer.[7] The self-renewal capacity of CSLCs plays significant roles in the progression and recurrence of tumors. Nanomedicine has emerged as a promising platform for the development of novel cancer therapy strategies[8−11] to target cancer cells including CSLCs.[12−14] During our massive screening of potential therapeutics against drug-resistance and stemness of HCC, we are pleasantly surprised that among many candidates, small-sized Pt nanoclusters can effectively overcome the chemoresistance and stemness in HCC. In fact, Pt nanoparticles are known to kill cancer cells[15−24] by the leached Pt ions under low pH conditions such as the cell endosome.[17,18] Especially when the particle size is reduced to less than 3 nm, >50% of the atoms will be located on the surface of the crystal,[25,26] resulting in increased oxygen adsorption and water oxidation for surface corrosion,[26] thus facilitating Pt ion release for enhanced activity. However, nonspecific targeting of Pt compound has a wide range of toxicity to normal tissues.[27,28] Consequently, targeted delivery and controlled Pt ion release are essential to precise cancer therapy. Unfortunately, to our best knowledge, thus far there is no report on platinum-based nanomedicine which can achieve both effective CSLC targeting and cellular environmentally sensitive anticancer activity. Self-assembly provides a reliable way of generating ensembles of nanoparticles with controllable properties,[29−31] and stimuli-responsive nanoparticle assemblies have been thoroughly examined as not only bio- or chemosensors in vitro(32−37) but also advanced drug delivery systems in vivo.[38−42] We hypothesized that the anticancer activity of platinum-based nanomedicine can be adjusted via controlled clustering of ultrasmall Pt nanoparticles using pH-sensitive surface ligands. To demonstrate the proof of concept, we herein report on the designed synthesis of a tumor pH-sensitive Pt nanocluster assembly (Pt-NA) by immobilizing ultrasmall Pt nanoclusters within pH-sensitive polymers and derivatizing with an HCC-targeting peptide. Unlike the reported platinum nanoparticle-based drugs,[15−18] the resulting Pt-NA has several advanced features for tumor treatment including (i) Pt-NA is latent in peripheral blood and readily targets tumor cells including CLSC because of the surface targeting peptide; (ii) protonation of pH-sensitive polymers in an acidic intracellular environment triggers Pt-NA disassembly into extremely small Pt nanoclusters; (iii) the resulting extremely small Pt nanoclusters with large specific surface accelerate the release of toxic Pt ions inside the cells for an effective cancer treatment. Our designed synthesis and anti-HCC strategy of Pt-NA are schematically illustrated in Figure A. Briefly, Pt-NA is prepared by assembling ultrasmall Pt nanoclusters in pH-sensitive polymers, followed by derivatizing with the HCC-targeting peptide. First, the assembly between Pt nanoclusters and two designed ligands (MA-F127 and octadecylamine-p(API-Asp)10) is performed via a unique hydrophobic force through the dual solvent-exchange method.[41] The unique ligand design allows maleimide groups (from MA-F127) to form on the surface of the assembled structure, which can readily conjugate with the thiol group (−SH) of HCC cell-specific peptide ligand SP94[43] (H2N-SFSIIHTPILPLGGC-COOH) via additional chemical reaction. We postulate that following the intravenous administration, Pt-NA accumulates in an HCC lesion via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect,[44,45] and SP94 specific ligands facilitate receptor-mediated endocytosis into HCC cells.[43] Furthermore, the endolysosomal acidification[46−48] collapses the assembled structure to release Pt nanoclusters, by destroying the hydrophilic–lipophilic balance in Pt-NA, and subsequently increases the Pt ion release rate in HCC cells.
Figure 1

Design and characterization of HCC-targeted pH-sensitive Pt nanocluster assembly (Pt-NA). (A) Schematic representation of Pt-NA synthesis, targeted HCC uptake and intracellular Pt ion release. (B) TEM image of the synthesized Pt nanoclusters. (C) TEM image of Pt-NA. (D) High-resolution TEM image of Pt-NA. (E) Photographs of Pt-NA in pH 6.0 and 7.4. (F) Transmittance of a suspension of Pt-NA as a function of pH. (G) DLS size measurement of Pt-NA (0.1 mg mL–1) as a function of pH. (H) pH profile of Pt-NA by acid–base titration.

Design and characterization of HCC-targeted pH-sensitive Pt nanocluster assembly (Pt-NA). (A) Schematic representation of Pt-NA synthesis, targeted HCC uptake and intracellular Pt ion release. (B) TEM image of the synthesized Pt nanoclusters. (C) TEM image of Pt-NA. (D) High-resolution TEM image of Pt-NA. (E) Photographs of Pt-NA in pH 6.0 and 7.4. (F) Transmittance of a suspension of Pt-NA as a function of pH. (G) DLS size measurement of Pt-NA (0.1 mg mL–1) as a function of pH. (H) pH profile of Pt-NA by acid–base titration.

Results and Discussion

Ultrasmall Pt nanoclusters of ∼2.5 nm were synthesized by thermal decomposition of Pt(acac)2 at 170 °C (Figure B, Figures S1 and S2). In order to obtain ultrasmall and uniform-sized Pt nanoclusters, we added 1 equiv of oleic acid in the reaction mixture containing Pt(acac)2 and oleylamine, and superhydride was injected in the reaction mixture to synthesize small-sized Pt nanoclusters (Figures S1C and S2). Interestingly, when only one ligand was added in the reaction mixture containing 1-octadecene as the solvent and Pt(acac)2, worm-like Pt nanocrystals were obtained due to insufficient capping agents (Figure S1A,D). The high concentration of oleic acid leads to particle aggregation, while colloidal uniform Pt nanocrystals are obtained when a high concentration of oleylamine as both surfactant and solvent is applied (Figure S1B,C,E). It was reported that small-sized nanoparticles generally show very high activity, because the smaller the nanoparticles are the faster the surface ion leaching is in aqueous solution.[49,50] As such, Pt ions release is much faster for ∼3 nm sized Pt nanoclusters than that for ∼10 nm sized Pt nanoparticles (Figure S3). However, in order to control their activity in vivo, two polymeric ligands are designed for tumor targeted pH-sensitive Pt-NA formation: (i) maleimide-functionalized pluronic F127 (MA-F127) (Figures S4A and S5); (ii) a synthetic pH-sensitive polypeptide (octadecylamine-p(API-Asp)10) composed of aspartic acid (10-mer) modified with ionizable imidazole side chains and an octadecylamine tail (Figure S4B). The successful conjugation of SP94 with pH-sensitive Pt-NA was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Figure S6). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Figure C,D) reveals that the particle size of Pt-NA is ∼100 nm. Scanning TEM and electron energy loss spectroscopy mapping further verify the assembled structure (Figure S7). Measurement of light transmittance as a function of pH (Figure E,F) demonstrates a pH-dependent assembly/disassembly process and a sharp drop in transmittance (% T) at a pH higher than ∼6.0. In particular, water-dispersible Pt-NA exhibits a hydrodynamic diameter about 180 nm (Figure G, at pH 7.4). Besides, its stability in both pure PBS and PBS solution containing 10% FBS is studied (Figure S8); maintaining particle size in both solutions for 1 week indicates the good colloid stability of Pt-NA. A slightly wider size distribution in PBS solution containing 10% FBS seems to result from insignificant protein binding.[51,52] Moreover, the assembly is highly sensitive to the acidity of the tumor and is readily dissociated upon the pH drop, as confirmed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Figure G) and TEM (Figure S9). In addition, the acid–base titration curve confirms the strong buffering capacity of aqueous Pt-NA dispersion (Figure H) in the physiological pH range due to the presence of imidazole rings, which is beneficial for endolysosomal escape of nanoparticles.[53] This sensitivity to tumor intracellular pH is a distinct property of Pt-NA compared to the previously reported Pt drugs.[15−18] We demonstrate that Pt-NA is structurally stable and latent at a physiological pH of 7.4, where Pt ion leaching is highly restrained. However, the tumor intracellular pH of <6 triggers the dissociation of Pt-NA and consequently accelerates Pt ion release (Figures S3 and S10). Moreover, these Pt nanoclusters are more robust than small-molecule drugs such as cisplatin, and they can remain inside hepatic CSLCs without being affected by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters.[54,55] The internalized Pt nanoclusters will constantly leak cytotoxic Pt ions only inside the HCC cells, facilitating DNA platination,[56] and effectively induce DNA damage and kill the cells (Figure S11). It is known that the platinum content of only 9.0 × 106 atoms cell–1 (2.9 × 10–6 ng cell–1) can efficiently kill cancer cells.[57] Consequently, according to the previous reports, the amount of Pt ions released inside HCC cells should be enough for effective cytotoxicity.[57,58] To verify our rationale, the cisplatin sensitivity of a panel of >20 liver cancer cell lines was evaluated, which shows heterogeneous sensitivity to cisplatin (Figure S12). And two acquired cisplatin-resistant HCC cell populations (HuH7-Cis and PLC/PRF/5-Cis) were established by treatment of a stepwise increase in cisplatin concentrations (Figure S13). Interestingly, we found that the SP+CD24+ CSLC population is elevated in both primary resistant and acquired resistant HCC cells by side population (SP) and HCC stem cell marker CD24 analysis (Figure S14).[59,60] Using a tumor sphere-forming assay, we found that the self-renewal ability of SP+CD24+ cells is much stronger than that of SP-CD24- cells (Figures S15 and S16). The effect of Pt-NA on overcoming the stemness of cisplatin-resistant liver cancer cells was first explored in vitro and compared to that of cisplatin (Figure ). Pt-NA shows dose-dependent inhibition of resistant SP+CD24+ cells (Figure A,B) and significantly decreases the sphere-forming ability of cisplatin-resistant SP+CD24+ cells (Figure C,D). In contrast to cisplatin, we further found that Pt-NA can effectively induce DNA damage to resistant CSLCs (Figure E).
Figure 2

Pt-NA overcomes the stemness of cisplatin-resistant HCC cells and induces DNA damage. (A, B) Dose-dependent inhibition effect of Pt-NA and cisplatin on cell growth in the cisplatin-resistant (A) HCCLM3 and (B) PLC/PRF/5-Cis cell lines. (C, D) Pt-NA significantly decreases the stemness of cisplatin-resistant SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 and PLC/PRF/5-Cis cells. (E) Pt-NA induces DNA damage in cisplatin-resistant HCC cells (scale bar, 50 μm).

Pt-NA overcomes the stemness of cisplatin-resistant HCC cells and induces DNA damage. (A, B) Dose-dependent inhibition effect of Pt-NA and cisplatin on cell growth in the cisplatin-resistant (A) HCCLM3 and (B) PLC/PRF/5-Cis cell lines. (C, D) Pt-NA significantly decreases the stemness of cisplatin-resistant SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 and PLC/PRF/5-Cis cells. (E) Pt-NA induces DNA damage in cisplatin-resistant HCC cells (scale bar, 50 μm). We next examined the in vitro cellular uptake efficiency of cisplatin and Pt-NA in the sorted SP–CD24– and SP+CD24+ cells from the HCCLM3 and PLC/PRF/5-Cis cell lines. The data shows that the amount of Pt taken up by sorted SP+CD24+ is much less than that by SP–CD24– cells for cisplatin, but such a difference is not observed for Pt-NA (Figure S17A–D). Importantly, Pt-NA is specifically taken up by the sorted SP+CD24+ cells rather than normal liver cells (Figure A). Furthermore, in contrast to pH-insensitive Pt nanoparticles, it is observed that most Pt-NA escapes from endosome (Figure S17E) due to the proton sponge effect of imidazole-containing polymeric ligands,[53] facilitating the nuclei localization of released Pt ions for DNA platination. On the other hand, compared to cisplatin, Pt-NA shows significantly lower toxicity to normal liver cells (Figure S18), implying that Pt-NA is safer and shows less side effects than cisplatin. The tumor targeting ability of Pt-NA is also demonstrated in vivo (Figure B) using an HCC orthotopic mouse model,[61] and the data are compared with those in normal mice (Figure S19). The location of tumors was further confirmed by anatomical study (Figure S20). As shown in Figure S21, Pt-NA showed a fair pharmacokinetic (PK) profile which is comparable to clinically approved cis-diammineplatinum(II) (CDDP, cisplatin),[62,63] and the biodistribution (BD) result of Pt-NA is very similar to other nanomaterial-based anticancer medicines, which mainly accumulates in liver and spleen.[64−66]
Figure 3

HCC targeting of Pt-NA. (A) Cellular uptake of Pt-NA in cisplatin-resistant and cancer stem-like SP+CD24+ cells. Pt-NA uptake is minimal in the normal liver cell line MIHA (scale bar, 50 μm). (B) In vivo biodistribution of Pt-NA in SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells of representative orthotopic HCC mice with different tumor sizes (2 h after injection, tumors are established from different number of sorted SP+CD24+ luciferase expressing HCCLM3 cells, tumor of Mouse #1 was developed from 10 000 sorted cells, while tumor of Mouse #2 was developed from 1000 sorted cells).

HCC targeting of Pt-NA. (A) Cellular uptake of Pt-NA in cisplatin-resistant and cancer stem-like SP+CD24+ cells. Pt-NA uptake is minimal in the normal liver cell line MIHA (scale bar, 50 μm). (B) In vivo biodistribution of Pt-NA in SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells of representative orthotopic HCC mice with different tumor sizes (2 h after injection, tumors are established from different number of sorted SP+CD24+ luciferase expressing HCCLM3 cells, tumor of Mouse #1 was developed from 10 000 sorted cells, while tumor of Mouse #2 was developed from 1000 sorted cells). To clarify the molecular mechanism about overcoming the stemness of cisplatin-resistant liver cancer cells, we conducted a gene expression profile analysis on sorted SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells treated with Pt-NA. By comparing with our established global gene expression profile database of human HCC,[67] many genes, which are prominently downregulated by Pt-NA, are those known to be highly expressed in liver cancer (Table S1). Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) demonstrates that Pt-NA mainly modulates genes related to the cell cycle and DNA damage-related pathways (Figures S22 and S23). These microarray data are further validated by RT-qPCR, showing that both ABCG2 and CD24 are highly expressed in the sorted SP+CD24+ cells and are downregulated by Pt-NA but not cisplatin (Figure A). Further RT-qPCR analysis also reveals that Pt-NA downregulates CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression, confirming its effects on the modulation of cell cycle and DNA damage regulation (Figure B). Since preclinical data regarding HCC appear to vary on a model-by-model basis,[68] the expression levels of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A were further examined in the clinical tissue samples from HCC patients during operation, and their expression levels are significantly overexpressed in tumor compared with matched normal tissues (Figure C). The immunohistochemistry staining also shows that the expression of CTNNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A is significantly upregulated in the tumor tissues compared with matched normal tissues of HCC patients (Figure D). The median values of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expressions are chosen as the cutoff point for determining high or low expression. Fisher’s exact test and Kaplan–Meier analysis reveal that high expression of CCNB1, CDK1, or TOP2A is correlated with poor survival in HCC patients (Figure E). These data suggest that the Pt-NA-mediated DNA damage can be attributed to downregulation of many genes that show high expression in liver cancer.
Figure 4

Pt-NA induces DNA damage through downregulation of genes that are highly expressed in liver cancer. (A) The expression of ABCG2 and CD24 in SP-CD24- and SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells with treatment of vehicle, Pt-NA or cisplatin. The expression of ABCG2 and CD24 was are significantly higher in SP+CD24+ cells compared to SP-CD24- cells. Pt-NA (but not cisplatin) induced the downregulation of ABCG2 and CD24 expression in the SP+CD24+ cells of the cisplatin-resistant HCCLM3 cell line, as determined by RT-qPCR. (B) The expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A in the SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells with treatment of vehicle, Pt-NA or cisplatin. Pt-NA (but not cisplatin) induced the downregulation of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression in the SP+CD24+ cells of the cisplatin-resistant HCCLM3 cell line, as determined by RT-qPCR. (C) The expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A significantly increased in tissue samples from HCC patients compared to matched adjacent nontumor tissues (T, tumorous liver tissue; MN, matched adjacent nontumor liver tissue) in our established HCC gene expression profile data set. (D) The representative images of immunohistochemistry showing that the expression of CTNNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A are significantly upregulated in the tumor tissues compared with matched normal tissues of HCC patients. (E) Fisher’s exact test and Kaplan–Meier analysis indicating that high expression of CCNB1, CDK1, or TOP2A is correlated with poor survival in HCC patients. (The median values of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression were chosen as the cutoff points for determining high and low expression groups.)

Pt-NA induces DNA damage through downregulation of genes that are highly expressed in liver cancer. (A) The expression of ABCG2 and CD24 in SP-CD24- and SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells with treatment of vehicle, Pt-NA or cisplatin. The expression of ABCG2 and CD24 was are significantly higher in SP+CD24+ cells compared to SP-CD24- cells. Pt-NA (but not cisplatin) induced the downregulation of ABCG2 and CD24 expression in the SP+CD24+ cells of the cisplatin-resistant HCCLM3 cell line, as determined by RT-qPCR. (B) The expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A in the SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells with treatment of vehicle, Pt-NA or cisplatin. Pt-NA (but not cisplatin) induced the downregulation of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression in the SP+CD24+ cells of the cisplatin-resistant HCCLM3 cell line, as determined by RT-qPCR. (C) The expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A significantly increased in tissue samples from HCC patients compared to matched adjacent nontumor tissues (T, tumorous liver tissue; MN, matched adjacent nontumor liver tissue) in our established HCC gene expression profile data set. (D) The representative images of immunohistochemistry showing that the expression of CTNNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A are significantly upregulated in the tumor tissues compared with matched normal tissues of HCC patients. (E) Fisher’s exact test and Kaplan–Meier analysis indicating that high expression of CCNB1, CDK1, or TOP2A is correlated with poor survival in HCC patients. (The median values of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression were chosen as the cutoff points for determining high and low expression groups.) Anti-HCC study demonstrates that Pt-NA shows superior therapeutic efficacy compared to both cisplatin and sorafenib (Figure A,B). After 3 months, the survival rate is highest for the Pt-NA-treated mice at ∼60% (Figure C). Moreover, more tumors became necrosed after being treated by Pt-NA compared to other treatment groups (Figure D). The in vivo anti-HCC effect of Pt-NA was further compared with cisplatin-incorporating polymeric micelles (cisplatin loaded poly(l-glutamic acid)-g-methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) complex nanoparticles, nanoplatin); it is not surprising that the orthotopic tumor xenografts developed from isolated cisplatin-resistant cells were also resistant to cisplatin loaded nanoparticles of nanoplatin, and consequently Pt-NA showed significantly better tumor inhibition effects than nanoplatin at the same Pt concentration (Figure S24). Immunohistochemical staining shows that the expressions of CD24 and ABCG2 drop in the Pt-NA-treated tumor tissues, while they increase in the cisplatin-treated ones (Figure D–F). The real time RT-qPCR results (Figure S25) show that the expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A of the tumors treated with Pt-NA also remarkably decreases, compared with the tumors treated with sorafenib or cisplatin. Finally, the liver/renal toxicity study together with histopathological examination prove the good biocompatibility of Pt-NA (Figure S26).
Figure 5

Pt-NA overcomes the cisplatin resistance and stemness of HCC in vivo. (A) Representative images showing bioluminescence signals and tumor-bearing livers of the orthotopic tumor xenografts at the therapeutic end point of different treatments. (B) Quantitative analysis of bioluminescence signals of all mice in the four treatment groups measured on a weekly basis. (C) The survival analysis of all mice in the four treatment groups. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for the expression of ABCG2 and CD24 in the tumors of mice in the different treatment groups, scale bar, 100 μm. (E, F) The quantified ABCG2 (E) and CD24 (F) levels from immunohistochemical staining results according to the percentage of cells with positive nuclei.

Pt-NA overcomes the cisplatin resistance and stemness of HCC in vivo. (A) Representative images showing bioluminescence signals and tumor-bearing livers of the orthotopic tumor xenografts at the therapeutic end point of different treatments. (B) Quantitative analysis of bioluminescence signals of all mice in the four treatment groups measured on a weekly basis. (C) The survival analysis of all mice in the four treatment groups. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for the expression of ABCG2 and CD24 in the tumors of mice in the different treatment groups, scale bar, 100 μm. (E, F) The quantified ABCG2 (E) and CD24 (F) levels from immunohistochemical staining results according to the percentage of cells with positive nuclei.

Conclusions

In summary, we synthesized a novel Pt nanocluster assembly (Pt-NA) that effectively overcomes the cisplatin resistance and heterogeneous stemness of HCC cells. The extremely small-sized Pt nanoclusters in HCC cells lead to the high toxicity resulting from a large surface area. The assembled structures of Pt-NA are designed for HCC targeting and response to a HCC intracellular acidic stimulus, which can readily target the CSLCs of HCC cells and further disassemble into small Pt nanoclusters in acidic HCC subcellular compartments, where Pt ions are released more quickly. Pt-NA can significantly kill HCC cells via DNA damage and overcome the cisplatin resistance of CLSCs. Moreover, we demonstrate the mechanism of these effects at the molecular level, by which Pt-NA has a good potential in clinical HCC treatment through downregulating a multitude of genes that are highly expressed in liver cancer patients.
  64 in total

1.  Highlights from the latest articles in nanomaterial-based therapies for targeting cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Tatsuyuki Yoshii; Yingying Geng; Ngoc D B Le; Hira Lal Goel; Arthur M Mercurio; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Properties and emerging applications of self-assembled structures made from inorganic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Zhihong Nie; Alla Petukhova; Eugenia Kumacheva
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  DNA damage and p53-mediated growth arrest in human cells treated with platinum nanoparticles.

Authors:  P V Asharani; Ng Xinyi; M Prakash Hande; Suresh Valiyaveettil
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  FePt@CoS(2) yolk-shell nanocrystals as a potent agent to kill HeLa cells.

Authors:  Jinhao Gao; Gaolin Liang; Bei Zhang; Yi Kuang; Xixiang Zhang; Bing Xu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Cellular uptake of platinum nanoparticles in human colon carcinoma cells and their impact on cellular redox systems and DNA integrity.

Authors:  Joanna Pelka; Helge Gehrke; Melanie Esselen; Michael Türk; Marlene Crone; Stefan Bräse; Thierry Muller; Holger Blank; Winfried Send; Volker Zibat; Patrice Brenner; Reinhard Schneider; Dagmar Gerthsen; Doris Marko
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 6.  Recent progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Mary Maluccio; Anne Covey
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Platinum folate nanoparticles toxicity: cancer vs. normal cells.

Authors:  Tatsiana Mironava; Marcia Simon; Miriam H Rafailovich; Basil Rigas
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  Nanoparticle-liver interactions: Cellular uptake and hepatobiliary elimination.

Authors:  Yi-Nan Zhang; Wilson Poon; Anthony J Tavares; Ian D McGilvray; Warren C W Chan
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 9.  Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer.

Authors:  Mark E Davis; Zhuo Georgia Chen; Dong M Shin
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  A nanoparticle-based strategy for the imaging of a broad range of tumours by nonlinear amplification of microenvironment signals.

Authors:  Yiguang Wang; Kejin Zhou; Gang Huang; Christopher Hensley; Xiaonan Huang; Xinpeng Ma; Tian Zhao; Baran D Sumer; Ralph J DeBerardinis; Jinming Gao
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: The present and the future.

Authors:  Marco Le Grazie; Maria Rosa Biagini; Mirko Tarocchi; Simone Polvani; Andrea Galli
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-28

2.  A Carrier-Free Nanostructure Based on Platinum(IV) Prodrug Enhances Cellular Uptake and Cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Jingjie Tan; Chan Li; Qian Wang; Shuyi Li; Shizhu Chen; Jinchao Zhang; Paul C Wang; Lei Ren; Xing-Jie Liang
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Soft and Condensed Nanoparticles and Nanoformulations for Cancer Drug Delivery and Repurpose.

Authors:  Wen Yang; Hanitrarimalala Veroniaina; Xiaole Qi; Pengyu Chen; Feng Li; Pu Chun Ke
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2019-10-16

4.  Overcoming Ovarian Cancer Drug Resistance with a Cold Responsive Nanomaterial.

Authors:  Hai Wang; Pranay Agarwal; Gang Zhao; Guang Ji; Christopher M Jewell; John P Fisher; Xiongbin Lu; Xiaoming He
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 14.553

5.  Injectable peptide hydrogel as intraperitoneal triptolide depot for the treatment of orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiyue Zhao; Xiaoyu Liu; Pengcheng Zhang; Yiran Liu; Wei Ran; Ying Cai; Junyang Wang; Yihui Zhai; Guanru Wang; Yaping Ding; Yaping Li
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 6.  Silicon Nanotubes as Potential Therapeutic Platforms.

Authors:  Nguyen T Le; Yuan Tian; Roberto Gonzalez-Rodriguez; Jeffery L Coffer
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  Biomimetic Liposomal Nanoplatinum for Targeted Cancer Chemophototherapy.

Authors:  Xue-Liang Liu; Xiao Dong; Si-Cong Yang; Xing Lai; Hai-Jun Liu; Yuhao Gao; Hai-Yi Feng; Mao-Hua Zhu; Yihang Yuan; Qin Lu; Jonathan F Lovell; Hong-Zhuan Chen; Chao Fang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 8.  Platinum-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (PIPN): ROS-Related Mechanism, Therapeutic Agents, and Nanosystems.

Authors:  Xi Hu; Zhijie Jiang; Longyu Teng; Hongyu Yang; Dongsheng Hong; Dongsheng Zheng; Qingwei Zhao
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 9.  Synergistic integration of metal nanoclusters and biomolecules as hybrid systems for therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Xin Chang; Dagan Zhang; Yafei Cai; Gen Chen; Hao Wang; Tianfu Wang
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 10.  Magnetic Nanomaterials for Arterial Embolization and Hyperthermia of Parenchymal Organs Tumors: A Review.

Authors:  Natalia E Kazantseva; Ilona S Smolkova; Vladimir Babayan; Jarmila Vilčáková; Petr Smolka; Petr Saha
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.