Hongping Xia1, Fangyuan Li2, Xi Hu3, Wooram Park4, Shuaifei Wang3, Youngjin Jang5, Yang Du3, Seungmin Baik5, Soojeong Cho4, Taegyu Kang5, Dong-Hyun Kim6, Daishun Ling2, Kam Man Hui7, Taeghwan Hyeon5. 1. Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Anti-Cancer Drug Research, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of the Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Laboratory of Cancer Genomics, Division of Cellular and Molecular Research, Humphrey Oei Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Center Singapore, 169610, Singapore. 2. Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Anti-Cancer Drug Research, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of the Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Anti-Cancer Drug Research, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of the Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. 3. Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Anti-Cancer Drug Research, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of the Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou 310058, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States. 5. Center for Nanoparticle Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Korea; School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. 6. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States; Department of Radiology, Northwestern University and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States. 7. Laboratory of Cancer Genomics, Division of Cellular and Molecular Research, Humphrey Oei Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Center Singapore, 169610, Singapore; Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, Singapore.
Abstract
Response rates to conventional chemotherapeutics remain unsatisfactory for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to the high rates of chemoresistance and recurrence. Tumor-initiating cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) are refractory to chemotherapy, and their enrichment leads to subsequent development of chemoresistance and recurrence. To overcome the chemoresistance and stemness in HCC, we synthesized a Pt nanocluster assembly (Pt-NA) composed of assembled Pt nanoclusters incorporating a pH-sensitive polymer and HCC-targeting peptide. Pt-NA is latent in peripheral blood, readily targets disseminated HCC CSLCs, and disassembles into small Pt nanoclusters in acidic subcellular compartments, eventually inducing damage to DNA. Furthermore, treatment with Pt-NA downregulates a multitude of genes that are vital for the proliferation of HCC. Importantly, CD24+ side population (SP) CSLCs that are resistant to cisplatin are sensitive to Pt-NA, demonstrating the immense potential of Pt-NA for treating chemoresistant HCC.
Response rates to conventional chemotherapeutics remain unsatisfactory for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to the high rates of chemoresistance and recurrence. Tumor-initiating cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) are refractory to chemotherapy, and their enrichment leads to subsequent development of chemoresistance and recurrence. To overcome the chemoresistance and stemness in HCC, we synthesized a Pt nanocluster assembly (Pt-NA) composed of assembled Pt nanoclusters incorporating a pH-sensitive polymer and HCC-targeting peptide. Pt-NA is latent in peripheral blood, readily targets disseminated HCC CSLCs, and disassembles into small Pt nanoclusters in acidic subcellular compartments, eventually inducing damage to DNA. Furthermore, treatment with Pt-NA downregulates a multitude of genes that are vital for the proliferation of HCC. Importantly, CD24+ side population (SP) CSLCs that are resistant to cisplatin are sensitive to Pt-NA, demonstrating the immense potential of Pt-NA for treating chemoresistant HCC.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the
second leading cause of cancer-associated
death worldwide.[1] Most HCCpatients are
inherently resistant to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs.[2] Currently, sorafenib is the only FDA-approved
target therapy drug (since 2007) for advanced HCC which increases
progression-free survival by a dismal three months compared to placebo.
Recently, the adjuvant sorafenib for HCC failed in a phase III, randomized,
double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial.[3] Therefore, the development of more effective therapeutic strategies
is much needed. Moreover, treating HCC with ineffective chemotherapeutics
leads to the enrichment of a rare subpopulation of tumor-initiating
cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs).[4] It has
been reported that resistance to cisplatin is associated with the
enrichment of CSLCs in ovarian,[5] lung,[6] and liver cancer.[7] The self-renewal capacity of CSLCs plays significant roles in the
progression and recurrence of tumors. Nanomedicine has emerged as
a promising platform for the development of novel cancer therapy strategies[8−11] to target cancer cells including CSLCs.[12−14]During
our massive screening of potential therapeutics against
drug-resistance and stemness of HCC, we are pleasantly surprised that
among many candidates, small-sized Pt nanoclusters can effectively
overcome the chemoresistance and stemness in HCC. In fact, Pt nanoparticles
are known to kill cancer cells[15−24] by the leached Pt ions under low pH conditions such as the cell
endosome.[17,18] Especially when the particle size is reduced
to less than 3 nm, >50% of the atoms will be located on the surface
of the crystal,[25,26] resulting in increased oxygen
adsorption and water oxidation for surface corrosion,[26] thus facilitating Pt ion release for enhanced activity.
However, nonspecific targeting of Pt compound has a wide range of
toxicity to normal tissues.[27,28] Consequently, targeted
delivery and controlled Pt ion release are essential to precise cancer
therapy. Unfortunately, to our best knowledge, thus far there is no
report on platinum-based nanomedicine which can achieve both effective
CSLC targeting and cellular environmentally sensitive anticancer activity.Self-assembly provides a reliable way of generating ensembles of
nanoparticles with controllable properties,[29−31] and stimuli-responsive
nanoparticle assemblies have been thoroughly examined as not only
bio- or chemosensors in vitro(32−37) but also advanced drug delivery systems in vivo.[38−42] We hypothesized that the anticancer activity of platinum-based nanomedicine
can be adjusted via controlled clustering of ultrasmall Pt nanoparticles
using pH-sensitive surface ligands. To demonstrate the proof of concept,
we herein report on the designed synthesis of a tumor pH-sensitive
Pt nanocluster assembly (Pt-NA) by immobilizing ultrasmall Pt nanoclusters
within pH-sensitive polymers and derivatizing with an HCC-targeting
peptide. Unlike the reported platinum nanoparticle-based drugs,[15−18] the resulting Pt-NA has several advanced features for tumor treatment
including (i) Pt-NA is latent in peripheral blood and readily targets
tumor cells including CLSC because of the surface targeting peptide;
(ii) protonation of pH-sensitive polymers in an acidic intracellular
environment triggers Pt-NA disassembly into extremely small Pt nanoclusters;
(iii) the resulting extremely small Pt nanoclusters with large specific
surface accelerate the release of toxic Pt ions inside the cells for
an effective cancer treatment.Our designed synthesis and anti-HCC
strategy of Pt-NA are schematically
illustrated in Figure A. Briefly, Pt-NA is prepared by assembling ultrasmall Pt nanoclusters
in pH-sensitive polymers, followed by derivatizing with the HCC-targeting
peptide. First, the assembly between Pt nanoclusters and two designed
ligands (MA-F127 and octadecylamine-p(API-Asp)10) is performed
via a unique hydrophobic force through the dual solvent-exchange method.[41] The unique ligand design allows maleimide groups
(from MA-F127) to form on the surface of the assembled structure,
which can readily conjugate with the thiol group (−SH) of HCC
cell-specific peptide ligand SP94[43] (H2N-SFSIIHTPILPLGGC-COOH)
via additional chemical reaction. We postulate that following the
intravenous administration, Pt-NA accumulates in an HCC lesion via
the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect,[44,45] and SP94 specific ligands facilitate receptor-mediated endocytosis
into HCC cells.[43] Furthermore, the endolysosomal
acidification[46−48] collapses the assembled structure to release Pt nanoclusters,
by destroying the hydrophilic–lipophilic balance in Pt-NA,
and subsequently increases the Pt ion release rate in HCC cells.
Figure 1
Design
and characterization of HCC-targeted pH-sensitive Pt nanocluster
assembly (Pt-NA). (A) Schematic representation of Pt-NA synthesis,
targeted HCC uptake and intracellular Pt ion release. (B) TEM image
of the synthesized Pt nanoclusters. (C) TEM image of Pt-NA. (D) High-resolution
TEM image of Pt-NA. (E) Photographs of Pt-NA in pH 6.0 and 7.4. (F)
Transmittance of a suspension of Pt-NA as a function of pH. (G) DLS
size measurement of Pt-NA (0.1 mg mL–1) as a function
of pH. (H) pH profile of Pt-NA by acid–base titration.
Design
and characterization of HCC-targeted pH-sensitive Pt nanocluster
assembly (Pt-NA). (A) Schematic representation of Pt-NA synthesis,
targeted HCC uptake and intracellular Pt ion release. (B) TEM image
of the synthesized Pt nanoclusters. (C) TEM image of Pt-NA. (D) High-resolution
TEM image of Pt-NA. (E) Photographs of Pt-NA in pH 6.0 and 7.4. (F)
Transmittance of a suspension of Pt-NA as a function of pH. (G) DLS
size measurement of Pt-NA (0.1 mg mL–1) as a function
of pH. (H) pH profile of Pt-NA by acid–base titration.
Results and Discussion
Ultrasmall
Pt nanoclusters of ∼2.5 nm were synthesized by
thermal decomposition of Pt(acac)2 at 170 °C (Figure B, Figures S1 and S2). In order to obtain ultrasmall and uniform-sized
Pt nanoclusters, we added 1 equiv of oleic acid in the reaction mixture
containing Pt(acac)2 and oleylamine, and superhydride was
injected in the reaction mixture to synthesize small-sized Pt nanoclusters
(Figures S1C and S2). Interestingly, when
only one ligand was added in the reaction mixture containing 1-octadecene
as the solvent and Pt(acac)2, worm-like Pt nanocrystals
were obtained due to insufficient capping agents (Figure S1A,D). The high concentration of oleic acid leads
to particle aggregation, while colloidal uniform Pt nanocrystals are
obtained when a high concentration of oleylamine as both surfactant
and solvent is applied (Figure S1B,C,E).
It was reported that small-sized nanoparticles generally show very
high activity, because the smaller the nanoparticles are the faster
the surface ion leaching is in aqueous solution.[49,50] As such, Pt ions release is much faster for ∼3 nm sized Pt
nanoclusters than that for ∼10 nm sized Pt nanoparticles (Figure S3). However, in order to control their
activity in vivo, two polymeric ligands are designed
for tumor targeted pH-sensitive Pt-NA formation: (i) maleimide-functionalized
pluronic F127 (MA-F127) (Figures S4A and S5); (ii) a synthetic pH-sensitive polypeptide (octadecylamine-p(API-Asp)10) composed of aspartic acid (10-mer) modified with ionizableimidazole side chains and an octadecylamine tail (Figure S4B). The successful conjugation of SP94 with pH-sensitive
Pt-NA was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy
(Figure S6).Transmission electron
microscopy (TEM, Figure C,D) reveals that the particle size of Pt-NA
is ∼100 nm. Scanning TEM and electron energy loss spectroscopy
mapping further verify the assembled structure (Figure S7). Measurement of light transmittance as a function
of pH (Figure E,F)
demonstrates a pH-dependent assembly/disassembly process and a sharp
drop in transmittance (% T) at a pH higher than ∼6.0. In particular,
water-dispersible Pt-NA exhibits a hydrodynamic diameter about 180
nm (Figure G, at pH
7.4). Besides, its stability in both pure PBS and PBS solution containing
10% FBS is studied (Figure S8); maintaining
particle size in both solutions for 1 week indicates the good colloid
stability of Pt-NA. A slightly wider size distribution in PBS solution
containing 10% FBS seems to result from insignificant protein binding.[51,52] Moreover, the assembly is highly sensitive to the acidity of the
tumor and is readily dissociated upon the pH drop, as confirmed by
dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Figure G) and TEM (Figure S9).
In addition, the acid–base titration curve confirms the strong
buffering capacity of aqueous Pt-NA dispersion (Figure H) in the physiological pH range due to the
presence of imidazole rings, which is beneficial for endolysosomal
escape of nanoparticles.[53]This sensitivity
to tumor intracellular pH is a distinct property
of Pt-NA compared to the previously reported Pt drugs.[15−18] We demonstrate that Pt-NA is structurally stable and latent at a
physiological pH of 7.4, where Pt ion leaching is highly restrained.
However, the tumor intracellular pH of <6 triggers the dissociation
of Pt-NA and consequently accelerates Pt ion release (Figures S3 and S10). Moreover, these Pt nanoclusters
are more robust than small-molecule drugs such as cisplatin, and they
can remain inside hepatic CSLCs without being affected by ATP-binding
cassette (ABC) transporters.[54,55] The internalized Ptnanoclusters will constantly leak cytotoxic Pt ions only inside the
HCC cells, facilitating DNA platination,[56] and effectively induce DNA damage and kill the cells (Figure S11). It is known that the platinum content
of only 9.0 × 106 atoms cell–1 (2.9
× 10–6 ng cell–1) can efficiently
kill cancer cells.[57] Consequently, according
to the previous reports, the amount of Pt ions released inside HCC
cells should be enough for effective cytotoxicity.[57,58]To verify our rationale, the cisplatin sensitivity of a panel
of
>20 liver cancer cell lines was evaluated, which shows heterogeneous
sensitivity to cisplatin (Figure S12).
And two acquired cisplatin-resistant HCC cell populations (HuH7-Cis
and PLC/PRF/5-Cis) were established by treatment of a stepwise increase
in cisplatin concentrations (Figure S13). Interestingly, we found that the SP+CD24+ CSLC population is elevated
in both primary resistant and acquired resistant HCC cells by side
population (SP) and HCC stem cell marker CD24 analysis (Figure S14).[59,60] Using a tumor
sphere-forming assay, we found that the self-renewal ability of SP+CD24+
cells is much stronger than that of SP-CD24- cells (Figures S15 and S16).The effect of Pt-NA on overcoming
the stemness of cisplatin-resistant
liver cancer cells was first explored in vitro and
compared to that of cisplatin (Figure ). Pt-NA shows dose-dependent inhibition of resistant
SP+CD24+ cells (Figure A,B) and significantly decreases the sphere-forming ability of cisplatin-resistant
SP+CD24+ cells (Figure C,D). In contrast to cisplatin, we further found that Pt-NA can effectively
induce DNA damage to resistant CSLCs (Figure E).
Figure 2
Pt-NA overcomes the stemness of cisplatin-resistant
HCC cells and
induces DNA damage. (A, B) Dose-dependent inhibition effect of Pt-NA
and cisplatin on cell growth in the cisplatin-resistant (A) HCCLM3
and (B) PLC/PRF/5-Cis cell lines. (C, D) Pt-NA significantly decreases
the stemness of cisplatin-resistant SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 and PLC/PRF/5-Cis
cells. (E) Pt-NA induces DNA damage in cisplatin-resistant HCC cells
(scale bar, 50 μm).
Pt-NA overcomes the stemness of cisplatin-resistant
HCC cells and
induces DNA damage. (A, B) Dose-dependent inhibition effect of Pt-NA
and cisplatin on cell growth in the cisplatin-resistant (A) HCCLM3
and (B) PLC/PRF/5-Cis cell lines. (C, D) Pt-NA significantly decreases
the stemness of cisplatin-resistant SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 and PLC/PRF/5-Cis
cells. (E) Pt-NA induces DNA damage in cisplatin-resistant HCC cells
(scale bar, 50 μm).We next examined the in vitro cellular uptake
efficiency of cisplatin and Pt-NA in the sorted SP–CD24–
and SP+CD24+ cells from the HCCLM3 and PLC/PRF/5-Cis cell lines. The
data shows that the amount of Pt taken up by sorted SP+CD24+ is much
less than that by SP–CD24– cells for cisplatin, but
such a difference is not observed for Pt-NA (Figure S17A–D). Importantly, Pt-NA is specifically taken up
by the sorted SP+CD24+ cells rather than normal liver cells (Figure A). Furthermore,
in contrast to pH-insensitive Pt nanoparticles, it is observed that
most Pt-NA escapes from endosome (Figure S17E) due to the proton sponge effect of imidazole-containing polymeric
ligands,[53] facilitating the nuclei localization
of released Pt ions for DNA platination. On the other hand, compared
to cisplatin, Pt-NA shows significantly lower toxicity to normal liver
cells (Figure S18), implying that Pt-NA
is safer and shows less side effects than cisplatin. The tumor targeting
ability of Pt-NA is also demonstrated in vivo (Figure B) using an HCC orthotopic
mouse model,[61] and the data are compared
with those in normal mice (Figure S19).
The location of tumors was further confirmed by anatomical study (Figure S20). As shown in Figure S21, Pt-NA showed a fair pharmacokinetic (PK) profile
which is comparable to clinically approved cis-diammineplatinum(II)
(CDDP, cisplatin),[62,63] and the biodistribution (BD)
result of Pt-NA is very similar to other nanomaterial-based anticancer
medicines, which mainly accumulates in liver and spleen.[64−66]
Figure 3
HCC
targeting of Pt-NA. (A) Cellular uptake of Pt-NA in cisplatin-resistant
and cancer stem-like SP+CD24+ cells. Pt-NA uptake is minimal in the
normal liver cell line MIHA (scale bar, 50 μm). (B) In vivo biodistribution of Pt-NA in SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells
of representative orthotopic HCC mice with different tumor sizes (2
h after injection, tumors are established from different number of
sorted SP+CD24+ luciferase expressing HCCLM3 cells, tumor of Mouse
#1 was developed from 10 000 sorted cells, while tumor of Mouse
#2 was developed from 1000 sorted cells).
HCC
targeting of Pt-NA. (A) Cellular uptake of Pt-NA in cisplatin-resistant
and cancer stem-like SP+CD24+ cells. Pt-NA uptake is minimal in the
normal liver cell line MIHA (scale bar, 50 μm). (B) In vivo biodistribution of Pt-NA in SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells
of representative orthotopic HCCmice with different tumor sizes (2
h after injection, tumors are established from different number of
sorted SP+CD24+ luciferase expressing HCCLM3 cells, tumor of Mouse
#1 was developed from 10 000 sorted cells, while tumor of Mouse
#2 was developed from 1000 sorted cells).To clarify the molecular mechanism about overcoming the stemness
of cisplatin-resistant liver cancer cells, we conducted a gene expression
profile analysis on sorted SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells treated with Pt-NA.
By comparing with our established global gene expression profile database
of humanHCC,[67] many genes, which are prominently
downregulated by Pt-NA, are those known to be highly expressed in
liver cancer (Table S1). Ingenuity pathway
analysis (IPA) demonstrates that Pt-NA mainly modulates genes related
to the cell cycle and DNA damage-related pathways (Figures S22 and S23). These microarray data are further validated
by RT-qPCR, showing that both ABCG2 and CD24 are
highly expressed in the sorted SP+CD24+ cells and are downregulated
by Pt-NA but not cisplatin (Figure A). Further RT-qPCR analysis also reveals that Pt-NA
downregulates CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression, confirming its effects on the modulation
of cell cycle and DNA damage regulation (Figure B). Since preclinical data regarding HCC
appear to vary on a model-by-model basis,[68] the expression levels of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A were further examined in the clinical
tissue samples from HCCpatients during operation, and their expression
levels are significantly overexpressed in tumor compared with matched
normal tissues (Figure C). The immunohistochemistry staining also shows that the expression
of CTNNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A is significantly upregulated in the tumor tissues compared with
matched normal tissues of HCCpatients (Figure D). The median values of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expressions are
chosen as the cutoff point for determining high or low expression.
Fisher’s exact test and Kaplan–Meier analysis reveal
that high expression of CCNB1, CDK1, or TOP2A is correlated with poor survival in HCCpatients (Figure E). These data suggest
that the Pt-NA-mediated DNA damage can be attributed to downregulation
of many genes that show high expression in liver cancer.
Figure 4
Pt-NA induces
DNA damage through downregulation of genes that are
highly expressed in liver cancer. (A) The expression of ABCG2 and CD24 in SP-CD24- and SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells with treatment of
vehicle, Pt-NA or cisplatin. The expression of ABCG2 and CD24 was are significantly higher in SP+CD24+ cells compared
to SP-CD24- cells. Pt-NA (but not cisplatin) induced the downregulation
of ABCG2 and CD24 expression in the SP+CD24+ cells
of the cisplatin-resistant HCCLM3 cell line, as determined by RT-qPCR.
(B) The expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A in the SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells with treatment
of vehicle, Pt-NA or cisplatin. Pt-NA (but not cisplatin) induced
the downregulation of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression in the SP+CD24+ cells of
the cisplatin-resistant HCCLM3 cell line, as determined by RT-qPCR.
(C) The expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A significantly increased in tissue samples
from HCC patients compared to matched adjacent nontumor tissues (T,
tumorous liver tissue; MN, matched adjacent nontumor liver tissue)
in our established HCC gene expression profile data set. (D) The representative
images of immunohistochemistry showing that the expression of CTNNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A are significantly upregulated in the tumor tissues compared with
matched normal tissues of HCC patients. (E) Fisher’s exact
test and Kaplan–Meier analysis indicating that high expression
of CCNB1, CDK1, or TOP2A is correlated with poor survival in HCC patients. (The median values
of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression were chosen as the cutoff points for determining high
and low expression groups.)
Pt-NA induces
DNA damage through downregulation of genes that are
highly expressed in liver cancer. (A) The expression of ABCG2 and CD24 in SP-CD24- and SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells with treatment of
vehicle, Pt-NA or cisplatin. The expression of ABCG2 and CD24 was are significantly higher in SP+CD24+ cells compared
to SP-CD24- cells. Pt-NA (but not cisplatin) induced the downregulation
of ABCG2 and CD24 expression in the SP+CD24+ cells
of the cisplatin-resistant HCCLM3 cell line, as determined by RT-qPCR.
(B) The expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A in the SP+CD24+ HCCLM3 cells with treatment
of vehicle, Pt-NA or cisplatin. Pt-NA (but not cisplatin) induced
the downregulation of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression in the SP+CD24+ cells of
the cisplatin-resistant HCCLM3 cell line, as determined by RT-qPCR.
(C) The expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A significantly increased in tissue samples
from HCCpatients compared to matched adjacent nontumor tissues (T,
tumorous liver tissue; MN, matched adjacent nontumor liver tissue)
in our established HCC gene expression profile data set. (D) The representative
images of immunohistochemistry showing that the expression of CTNNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A are significantly upregulated in the tumor tissues compared with
matched normal tissues of HCCpatients. (E) Fisher’s exact
test and Kaplan–Meier analysis indicating that high expression
of CCNB1, CDK1, or TOP2A is correlated with poor survival in HCCpatients. (The median values
of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A expression were chosen as the cutoff points for determining high
and low expression groups.)Anti-HCC study demonstrates that Pt-NA shows superior therapeutic
efficacy compared to both cisplatin and sorafenib (Figure A,B). After 3 months, the survival
rate is highest for the Pt-NA-treated mice at ∼60% (Figure C). Moreover, more
tumors became necrosed after being treated by Pt-NA compared to other
treatment groups (Figure D). The in vivo anti-HCC effect of Pt-NA
was further compared with cisplatin-incorporating polymeric micelles
(cisplatin loaded poly(l-glutamic acid)-g-methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) complex nanoparticles, nanoplatin);
it is not surprising that the orthotopic tumor xenografts developed
from isolated cisplatin-resistant cells were also resistant to cisplatin
loaded nanoparticles of nanoplatin, and consequently Pt-NA showed
significantly better tumor inhibition effects than nanoplatin at the
same Pt concentration (Figure S24). Immunohistochemical
staining shows that the expressions of CD24 and ABCG2 drop in the
Pt-NA-treated tumor tissues, while they increase in the cisplatin-treated
ones (Figure D–F).
The real time RT-qPCR results (Figure S25) show that the expression of CCNB1, CDK1, and TOP2A of the tumors treated with Pt-NA also
remarkably decreases, compared with the tumors treated with sorafenib
or cisplatin. Finally, the liver/renal toxicity study together with
histopathological examination prove the good biocompatibility of Pt-NA
(Figure S26).
Figure 5
Pt-NA overcomes the cisplatin
resistance and stemness of HCC in vivo. (A) Representative
images showing bioluminescence
signals and tumor-bearing livers of the orthotopic tumor xenografts
at the therapeutic end point of different treatments. (B) Quantitative
analysis of bioluminescence signals of all mice in the four treatment
groups measured on a weekly basis. (C) The survival analysis of all
mice in the four treatment groups. (D) Immunohistochemical staining
for the expression of ABCG2 and CD24 in the tumors
of mice in the different treatment groups, scale bar, 100 μm.
(E, F) The quantified ABCG2 (E) and CD24 (F) levels
from immunohistochemical staining results according to the percentage
of cells with positive nuclei.
Pt-NA overcomes the cisplatin
resistance and stemness of HCC in vivo. (A) Representative
images showing bioluminescence
signals and tumor-bearing livers of the orthotopic tumor xenografts
at the therapeutic end point of different treatments. (B) Quantitative
analysis of bioluminescence signals of all mice in the four treatment
groups measured on a weekly basis. (C) The survival analysis of all
mice in the four treatment groups. (D) Immunohistochemical staining
for the expression of ABCG2 and CD24 in the tumors
of mice in the different treatment groups, scale bar, 100 μm.
(E, F) The quantified ABCG2 (E) and CD24 (F) levels
from immunohistochemical staining results according to the percentage
of cells with positive nuclei.
Conclusions
In summary, we synthesized a novel Pt nanocluster
assembly (Pt-NA)
that effectively overcomes the cisplatin resistance and heterogeneous
stemness of HCC cells. The extremely small-sized Pt nanoclusters in
HCC cells lead to the high toxicity resulting from a large surface
area. The assembled structures of Pt-NA are designed for HCC targeting
and response to a HCC intracellular acidic stimulus, which can readily
target the CSLCs of HCC cells and further disassemble into small Pt
nanoclusters in acidic HCC subcellular compartments, where Pt ions
are released more quickly. Pt-NA can significantly kill HCC cells
via DNA damage and overcome the cisplatin resistance of CLSCs. Moreover,
we demonstrate the mechanism of these effects at the molecular level,
by which Pt-NA has a good potential in clinical HCC treatment through
downregulating a multitude of genes that are highly expressed in liver
cancerpatients.
Authors: Tatsuyuki Yoshii; Yingying Geng; Ngoc D B Le; Hira Lal Goel; Arthur M Mercurio; Vincent M Rotello Journal: Nanomedicine (Lond) Date: 2015-11-26 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Yi-Nan Zhang; Wilson Poon; Anthony J Tavares; Ian D McGilvray; Warren C W Chan Journal: J Control Release Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Hai Wang; Pranay Agarwal; Gang Zhao; Guang Ji; Christopher M Jewell; John P Fisher; Xiongbin Lu; Xiaoming He Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 14.553
Authors: Natalia E Kazantseva; Ilona S Smolkova; Vladimir Babayan; Jarmila Vilčáková; Petr Smolka; Petr Saha Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 5.076