| Literature DB >> 27924161 |
Bo Xiao1, Zhan Zhang2, Emilie Viennois3, Yuejun Kang4, Mingzhen Zhang2, Moon Kwon Han2, Jiucun Chen4, Didier Merlin3.
Abstract
Combination therapy is an emerging strategy tEntities:
Keywords: anti-inflammation; combination therapy; mucosal protection; oral administration; targeted nanoparticle; ulcerative colitis.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27924161 PMCID: PMC5135446 DOI: 10.7150/thno.15710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Scheme 1The synergistic therapeutic effects of HA-siCD98/CUR-NPs against UC. (a) A schematic illustration for the fabrication of HA-siCD98/CUR-NPs. (b) Oral administration of HA-siCD98/CUR-NPs embedded in hydrogel (chitosan/alginate) confers synergistic therapeutic effects against UC by protecting mucosa and alleviating inflammation.
Characteristics of the siCD98/CUR-loaded nanoparticles (mean ± S.E.M.; n=3).
| Nanoparticles | Particle Size (nm) | PDI | Zeta-potential (mV) | Drug Loading | Encapsulation Efficiency (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| siCD98 (ng/mg) | CUR (μg/mg) | siCD98 | CUR | ||||
| HA-siCD98-NPs | 240.5 ± 5.3 | 0.171 | -15.8 ± 3.2 | 142.6 ± 15.1 | - | 56.1 ± 4.8 | - |
| HA-CUR-NPs | 253.9 ± 9.1 | 0.149 | -17.9 ± 2.9 | - | 45.7 ± 11.2 | - | 61.7 ± 10.3 |
| HA-siCD98/CUR-NPs | 246.2 ± 7.8 | 0.221 | -13.7 ± 4.1 | 52.9 ± 3.9 | 39.4 ± 7.1 | 24.2 ± 1.5 | 53.2 ± 7.4 |
| CUL-CUR-NPs | 260.5 ± 11.4 | 0.247 | -15.3 ± 5.2 | - | 51.5 ± 9.6 | - | 64.5 ± 8.9 |
Figure 1Physicochemical and morphological characterization of NPs. Representative TEM images of CS-siCD98/CUR-NPs (a) and HA-siCD98/CUR-NPs (b). The insert highlights the TEM of an individual NP. (c) Representative size distribution of HA-siCD98/CUR-NPs. (d) In vitro cumulative release of siCD98 and CUR from HA-siCD98/CUR-NPs at 37 oC. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M. (n=3). (e) Cellular uptake profiles of HA-CUR-NPs in Colon-26 cells and Raw 264.7 macrophages after treatment with a CUR concentration of 100 μM for 5 h. After co-incubation, the cells were processed for fluorescence staining. Fixed cells were stained with DAPI for visualization of nuclei (purple). Scale bar represents 10 μm.
Figure 2HA functionalization increases the cellular uptake of NPs. Flow cytometry histogram overlays show the cellular uptake of NPs by Colon-26 cells (a) and Raw 267.4 macrophages (b) after 5 h of treatment. Analysis of the percentage of CUR fluorescence-positive Colon-26 cells (c) and Raw 267.4 macrophages (d) after treatment with a respective CUR concentration of 25 μM and 50μM. Competitive cellular uptake profiles of HA-functionalized NPs by Colon-26 cells (e) and Raw 264.7 macrophages (f). HA-CUR-NPs were incubated with cells in the presence of free HA (5 mg/mL) as a competitor. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.M. (n=3). Statistical significance was assessed using Studentʹs t-test (*P<0.05 and **P<0.01).
Figure 3HA-siCD98/CUR-NPs prevent mucosa damage. Cells were cultured in transwell plates, and Caco2-BBE cell layer was treated with various NPs for 24 h. Subsequently, FITC-labeled dextran (100 μM) was added to the apical side of Caco2-BBE monolayer and LPS (5 μg/mL) was added the basolateral side with Raw 264.7 macrophages. After 3 h of incubation, the fluorescent intensity of medium was tested. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.M. (n=3). Statistical significance was assessed using the Student's t-test (*P<0.05 and **P<0.01).
Figure 4In vitro gene downregulation capacities of NPs against Colon-26 cells and RAW 267.4 macrophages. (a) CD98 mRNA expression levels of Colon-26 cells exposed to NPs for 24 h. The mRNA expression levels of CD98 (b) and TNF-α (c) for Raw 264.7 macrophages exposed to NPs for 24 h. After treatment by NPs, cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 3 h. (d) CD98 mRNA expression levels of Colon-26 cells exposed to NPs for 48 h. The mRNA expression levels of CD98 (e) and TNF-α (f) for Raw 264.7 macrophages exposed to NPs for 48 h. After treatment by NPs, cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 3 h. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.M. (n=3). Statistical significance was assessed using the Student's t-test (*P<0.05, **P<0.01; ns, non-significant).
Figure 5The uptake profiles of HA-functionalized NPs by colitis tissue. (a) Representative SEM images of the resulting hydrogel (chitosan and alginate) loaded with NPs. (b) Typical images of colon imaging showing accumulation of orally HA-functionalized NPs embedded in hydrogel in colon at four different time points (0, 8, 16 and 24 h). (c) Colitis tissue uptake of NPs after 12 h of oral administration of HA-functionalized NPs embedded in hydrogel (5 mg CUR/kg per mouse). Fixed colitis tissues were stained with Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin and DAPI to visualize actin (red) and nuclei (purple), respectively. Scale bar represents 20 μm.
Figure 6Oral administration of HA-functionalized NPs embedded in hydrogel relieve DSS-induced UC in mice. (a) Mouse body weight over time, normalized as a percentage of day zero body weight and given as the mean of each treatment group. Arrows indicate the days of oral administration of drug-loaded NPs. (b) The real-time concentration of fecal Lcn-2. Fecal Lcn-2 levels were measured by ELISA. (c) Colonic MPO activity, spleen weight and colon length of mice in different treatment groups. The MPO results are expressed as units of MPO activity per gram of tissue. (d) The mRNA expression levels of CD98 and TNF-α in mice with different treatments. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.M. (n=5). Statistical significance was assessed using ANOVA test followed by a Bonferroni post-hoc test (*P<0.05 and **P<0.01).
Figure 7Representative H&E-stained colon sections from DSS-treated mice administered with daily double gavages of hydrogel with different NPs for 6 days. Healthy control mice group (a), DSS-treated mice group (b), HA-siCD98-NPs-treated mice group (c), HA-CUR-NPs-treated mice group (d) and HA-siCD98/CUR-NPs-treated mice group (e). Arrow: erosion; arrowhead: lymphocyte infiltration. Scale bar represents 100 μm.