Literature DB >> 27923604

Individual differences in cognition and personality.

Lauren M Guillette1, Marc Naguib2, Andrea S Griffin3.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27923604     DOI： 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN： 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Testing the predictions of coping styles theory in threespined sticklebacks.

Authors:  Miles K Bensky; Ryan Paitz; Laura Pereira; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Social ascent changes cognition, behaviour and physiology in a highly social cichlid fish.

Authors:  Kelly J Wallace; Kavyaa D Choudhary; Layla A Kutty; Don H Le; Matthew T Lee; Karleen Wu; Hans A Hofmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Intraspecific variation in cue-specific learning in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Miles K Bensky; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Consistency and flexibility in solving spatial tasks: different horses show different cognitive styles.

Authors:  Paolo Baragli; Valentina Vitale; Claudio Sighieri; Antonio Lanata; Elisabetta Palagi; Adam R Reddon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Personality and Cognition: Sociability Negatively Predicts Shoal Size Discrimination Performance in Guppies.

Authors:  Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato; Marco Dadda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-30

7.  Tameness does not correlate with the learning of an appetitive association in a wild canid.

Authors:  Matthew B Petelle; Stéphanie Périquet; Aliza le Roux
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Fish learn collectively, but groups with differing personalities are slower to decide and more likely to split.

Authors:  Kyriacos Kareklas; Robert W Elwood; Richard A Holland
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  The quick are the dead: pheasants that are slow to reverse a learned association survive for longer in the wild.

Authors:  Joah R Madden; Ellis J G Langley; Mark A Whiteside; Christine E Beardsworth; Jayden O van Horik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  A Framework to Assess the Impact of New Animal Management Technologies on Welfare: A Case Study of Virtual Fencing.

Authors:  Caroline Lee; Ian G Colditz; Dana L M Campbell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.