| Literature DB >> 27923405 |
Erin E Milner1, Jonathan Berman2, Diana Caridha2, Samuel P Dickson3, Mark Hickman2, Patricia J Lee2, Sean R Marcsisin2, Lisa T Read3, Norma Roncal2, Brian A Vesely2, Lisa H Xie2, Jing Zhang2, Ping Zhang2, Qigui Li2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the ability of the 8-aminoquinolines (8AQs) to kill different stages of the malaria parasite, primaquine (PQ) and tafenoquine (TQ) are vital for causal prophylaxis and the eradication of erythrocytic Plasmodium sp. parasites. Recognizing the potential role of cytochrome (CYP) 450 2D6 in the metabolism and subsequent hepatic efficacy of 8-aminoquinolines, studies were designed to explore whether CYP2D-mediated metabolism was related to the ability of single-dose PQ and TQ to eliminate the asexual and sexual erythrocytic stages of Plasmodium berghei.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27923405 PMCID: PMC5142148 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1632-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
In vivo P. berghei intravenous (IV) sporozoite challenge causal prophylactic and erythrocytic models
| Model | Causal prophylactic model | Erythrocytic treatment model |
|---|---|---|
| Drug administration (day)a | −1, 0, and/or +1 | +4 |
| Endpointb | Hepatic and erythrocytic parasites (asexual parasitemia) | Erythrocytic parasites: parasitemia (asexual), gametocytemia (sexual) |
| Technique | IVIS (liver), flow cytometry (parasitemia) | Flow cytometry (parasitemia) microscopy (gametocytemia) |
aDay of drug administration relative to IV sporozoite inoculation (day 0). IVIS In vivo imaging system
bAnimals are monitored for 30 days or recrudescence and subsequent euthanasia due to comorbidities
Primaquine (PQ) wild-type (WT) dose-ranging studies using C57BL/6 mice
| Day dose administereda | PQ dose (mg/kg) | No hepatic IVIS signalb | No asexual erythrocytic infection (parasitemia)c | No sexual erythrocytic infection (gametocytemia)c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Causal prophylactic model | ||||
| D0, D1 | 25 × 2d | 5/5 (D1), 5/5 (D2) | 5/5 | NA |
| D0 | 10 | 5/5 (D1), 5/5 (D2) | 3/5 | NA |
| 20 | 5/5 (D1), 5/5 (D2) | 5/5 | NA | |
| 40 | 5/5 (D1), 5/5 (D2) | 5/5 | NA | |
| D1 | 40 | 1/5 (D1), 1/5 (D2) | 0/5 | NA |
| Erythrocytic treatment model | ||||
| D4 | 10 | NA | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| 20 | NA | 0/5 | 0/5 | |
| 40 | NA | 0/5 | 0/5 | |
PQ primaquine, mg/kg milligrams free base of drug per kg body weight, NA not applicable, IVIS in vivo imaging system
aDay of drug administration relative to intravenous sporozoite (IV SPZ) challenge (day 0) using C57BL/6 wild-type mice
bNumber of animals without an IVIS signal (indicates no hepatic infection). D1 day 1 (relative to IV SPZ challenge day 0). D2 day 2 (relative to IV SPZ challenge day 0)
cNumber of animals without parasitemia (flow cytometry) or gametocytemia (microscopy) day 29. N = 5 animals per cohort
Tafenoquine (TQ) wild-type (WT) dose-ranging studies using C57BL/6 mice
| Day dose administereda | PQ dose (mg/kg) | No hepatic IVIS signalb | No asexual erythrocytic infection (parasitemia)c | No sexual erythrocytic infection (gametocytemia)c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Causal prophylactic model | ||||
| D1 | 2.5 | 0/5 (D1), 0/5 (D2) | 0/5 | NA |
| 5 | 3/5 (D1), 2/5 (D2) | 0/5 | NA | |
| 10 | 5/5 (D1), 5/5 (D2) | 4/5 | NA | |
| 20 | 5/5 (D1), 5/5 (D2) | 5/5 | NA | |
| D0 | 2.5 | 0/5 (D1), 0/5 (D2) | 0/5 | NA |
| 5 | 4/5 (D1), 4/5 (D2) | 3/5 | NA | |
| 10 | 3/5 (D1), 4/5 (D2) | 2/5 | NA | |
| 20 | 5/5 (D1), 5/5 (D2) | 5/5 | NA | |
| D1 | 20 | 0/5 (D1), 0/5 (D2) | 5/5 | NA |
| Erythrocytic treatment model | ||||
| D4 | 5 | NA | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| 10 | NA | 0/5 | 0/5 | |
| 20 | NA | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
TQ tafenoquine, mg/kg milligrams free base of drug per kg body weight, NA not applicable, IVIS in vivo imaging system
aDay of drug administration relative to intravenous sporozoite (IV SPZ) challenge (day 0) using C57BL/6 wild-type mice
bNumber of animals without an IVIS signal (indicates no hepatic infection). D1 = day 1 (relative to IV SPZ challenge day 0). D2 = day 2 (relative to IV SPZ challenge day 0)
cNumber of animals without parasitemia (flow cytometry) or gametocytemia (microscopy) day 29. N = 5 animals per cohort
Fig. 1Statistical comparison regarding differences in parasitemia between WT and CYP2D KO mice. The data were modeled using linear regression with repeated measures with a spatial power law covariance structure. The model included terms for study day, treatment group, mouse strain, and all interactions between the three terms. All point estimates, intervals, and p values therefore represent the differences within each day between mouse strains after adjusting for repeated measurements on the same mice. 40 mg/kg primaquine (PQ), 25 mg/kg tafenoquine (TQ), or vehicle control (VC) administered day 4 relative to intravenous sporozoite (IV SPZ) challenge (day 0) using C57BL/6 wild-type or C57BL/6 CYP2D knock-out mice. N = 10 animals per cohort. (Refer to Additional file 1: Figure S5 for percent parasitemia)
Fig. 2Statistical comparison regarding differences in gametocytemia between WT and CYP2D KO mice. The data were modeled using linear regression with repeated measures with a spatial power law covariance structure. The model included terms for study day, treatment group, mouse strain, and all interactions between the three terms. All point estimates, intervals, and p values therefore represent the differences within each day between mouse strains after adjusting for repeated measurements on the same mice. 40 mg/kg primaquine (PQ), 25 mg/kg tafenoquine (TQ), or vehicle control (VC) administered day 4 relative to intravenous sporozoite (IV SPZ) challenge (day 0) using C57BL/6 wild-type or C57BL/6 CYP2D knock-out mice. N = 10 animals per cohort. (Refer to Additional file 1: Figure S6 for gametocytemia)
Fig. 3Relative fold changes of primaquine and tafenoquine CYP2D KO pharmacokinetic parameters from reference (WT parameters) in mouse plasma and liver. Indicated are the fold changes after the administration 20 mg/kg primaquine (PQ) and 20 mg/kg tafenoquine (TQ) in the CYP2D KO strain as compared to WT C57BL/6 mice. The fold change is indicated by the x-axis and the pharmacokinetic parameter on the y-axis. A value of one represents no relative change in the pharmacokinetic parameter between the KO and WT mice. The grey bars are provided for visual reference. The error shown is the standard deviation of relative fold changes for KO pharmacokinetic parameters as compared to WT means pharmacokinetic parameter values. PQ and TQ comparisons were conducted using experimental data generated at the WRAIR [26, 27]. WT C57BL/6 wild-type mice. CYP2D KO C57BL CYP2D6 knock-out mice. MRT mean resonance time. CL/F apparent total clearance of the drug from plasma after oral administration. Vz/F apparent volume of distribution during terminal phase after non-intravenous administration. AUCinf area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity. AUClast area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last measurable concentration. Cmax: maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration. Tmax time to reachmaximum (peak) plasma concentration following drug administration. T1/2 elimination half-life