| Literature DB >> 26888075 |
Pamela L St Jean1, Zhengyu Xue2, Nick Carter3, Gavin C K W Koh4, Stephan Duparc5, Maxine Taylor6, Claire Beaumont7, Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas8, Ronnatrai Rueangweerayut9, Srivicha Krudsood10, Justin A Green11, Justin P Rubio12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tafenoquine (TQ) and primaquine (PQ) are 8-aminoquinolines (8-AQ) with anti-hypnozoite activity against vivax malaria. PQ is the only FDA-approved medicine for preventing relapsing Plasmodium vivax infection and TQ is currently in phase 3 clinical trials for the same indication. Recent studies have provided evidence that cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism via CYP2D6 plays a role in PQ efficacy against P. vivax and have suggested that this effect may extend to other 8-AQs, including TQ. Here, a retrospective pharmacogenetic (PGx) investigation was performed to assess the impact of CYP2D6 metabolism on TQ and PQ efficacy in the treatment of P. vivax in the DETECTIVE study (TAF112582), a recently completed, randomized, phase 2b dose-ranging clinical trial. The impact of CYP2D6 on TQ pharmacokinetics (PK) was also investigated in TAF112582 TQ-treated subjects and in vitro CYP metabolism of TQ was explored. A limitation of the current study is that TAF112582 was not designed to be well powered for PGx, thus our findings are based on TQ or PQ efficacy in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers (IM), as there were insufficient poor metabolizers (PM) to draw any conclusion on the impact of the PM phenotype on efficacy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26888075 PMCID: PMC4757974 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1145-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Clinical outcome and country by treatment in 199 subjects involved in the CYP2D6 PGx analysis
| TQ plus CQ (n = 134, total) | PQ plus CQ (n = 31) | CQ plus placebo (n = 34) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 mg (n = 34) | 100 mg (n = 35) | 300 mg (n = 37) | 600 mg (n = 28) | |||
| N, subjects (%) per treatment arm | ||||||
| Clinical outcome | ||||||
| 6 month relapse-free (n = 126) | 18 (53) | 17 (49) | 32 (86) | 26 (93) | 23 (74) | 10 (29) |
| Relapsed (n = 73) | 16 (47) | 18 (51) | 5 (14) | 2 (7) | 8 (26) | 24 (71) |
| Country | ||||||
| India (n = 3) | 1 (3) | 1 (3) | 1 (3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Peru (n = 114) | 20 (59) | 21 (60) | 19 (51) | 16 (57) | 18 (58) | 20 (59) |
| Thailand (n = 82) | 13 (38) | 13 (37) | 17 (46) | 12 (43) | 13 (42) | 14 (41) |
Distribution of CYP2D6 genotype, metabolizer phenotype and activity score
|
| CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotypea | CYP2D6 activity scoreb | All subjects n = 199 N (%) | India n = 3 N (%) | Peru n = 114 N (%) | Thailand n = 82 N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *4/*4 | PM | 0 | 1 (0.5) | – | 1 (0.9) | – |
| *4/*41 | IM | 0.5 | 1 (0.5) | – | 1 (0.9) | – |
| *1/*4 | IM | 1.0 | 11 (5.5) | – | 8 (7.0) | 3 (3.7) |
| *10/*10 | IM | 1.0 | 19 (9.5) | – | – | 19 (23.2) |
| *10/*41 | IM | 1.0 | 2 (1) | – | – | 2 (2.4) |
| *2/*4 | IM | 1.0 | 3 (1.5) | – | 3 (2.6) | – |
| *41/*41 | IM | 1.0 | 2 (1) | – | – | 2 (2.4) |
| *1/*10 | EM | 1.5 | 15 (7.5) | – | – | 15 (18.3) |
| *1/*41 | EM | 1.5 | 6 (3) | – | 3 (2.6) | 3 (3.7) |
| *1/*9 | EM | 1.5 | 2 (1) | – | 2 (1.8) | – |
| *2/*10 | EM | 1.5 | 14 (7) | – | – | 14 (17.1) |
| *2/*41 | EM | 1.5 | 4 (2) | – | – | 4 (4.9) |
| *1/*1 | EM | 2.0 | 47 (23.6) | – | 35 (30.7) | 12 (14.6) |
| *1/*2 | EM | 2.0 | 45 (22.6) | 3 (100) | 40 (35.1) | 2 (2.4) |
| *2/*2 | EM | 2.0 | 27 (13.6) | – | 21 (18.4) | 6 (7.3) |
aCYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM), intermediate metabolizers (IM), extensive metabolizers (EM)
bCYP2D6 activity score is the sum of the per-allele scores; a null allele having a score of 0, a deficient allele a score of 0.5 and a normal allele a score of 1 [12]
Fig. 1Clinical outcome by treatment and CYP2D6 status. Relapse frequency is the percentage (%) of subjects who experienced a relapse, with error bars representing the standard error of the mean. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were from analyses comparing the relapse frequency of reduced metabolizers (IMs) with that of extensive metabolizers (EMs) within each treatment group. Exact logistic regression was used to derive ORs, except for the TQ high dose arm (TQ 300 mg/TQ 600 mg), in which Fisher’s Exact test was used with a correction of 0.05 to each cell as there were no IM subjects who relapsed. One-sided p values (p) are displayed (see “Methods” section)
Fig. 2Box whisker plot of TQ AUC by CYP2D6 status. The box whisker plots are displayed separately for the TQ high dose arm (TQ 300 mg/TQ 600 mg) and TQ low dose (TQ 50 mg/TQ 100 mg) arms, respectively. The median AUC is represented by the thick horizontal line, while the lower and upper box edges (‘hinges’) represent the quartiles (the 25th and 75th percentiles). The interquartile range (IQR) is the distance between the first and third quartiles. The upper (lower) whisker extends from the upper (lower) hinge to the highest (lowest) value that is within 1.5 *IQR of the hinge
Fig. 3Summary of TQ-related components detected in incubations of TQ with recombinant human CYP Supersomes. TQ-related compounds detected in 5 and 10 μM incubations of TQ with recombinant human CYP enzymes (Supersomes™), hepatocytes and appropriate controls (retention time and protonated molecular ion observed by UPLC-MS in parenthesis). The Carboxy-TQ derivative observed after prolonged incubation is circled