Literature DB >> 27922878

Higher Fluid Balance Increases the Risk of Death From Sepsis: Results From a Large International Audit.

Yasser Sakr1, Paolo Nahuel Rubatto Birri, Katarzyna Kotfis, Rahul Nanchal, Bhagyesh Shah, Stefan Kluge, Mary E Schroeder, John C Marshall, Jean-Louis Vincent.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Excessive fluid therapy in patients with sepsis may be associated with risks that outweigh any benefit. We investigated the possible influence of early fluid balance on outcome in a large international database of ICU patients with sepsis.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study.
SETTING: Seven hundred and thirty ICUs in 84 countries. PATIENTS: All adult patients admitted between May 8 and May 18, 2012, except admissions for routine postoperative surveillance. For this analysis, we included only the 1,808 patients with an admission diagnosis of sepsis. Patients were stratified according to quartiles of cumulative fluid balance 24 hours and 3 days after ICU admission.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ICU and hospital mortality rates were 27.6% and 37.3%, respectively. The cumulative fluid balance increased from 1,217 mL (-90 to 2,783 mL) in the first 24 hours after ICU admission to 1,794 mL (-951 to 5,108 mL) on day 3 and decreased thereafter. The cumulative fluid intake was similar in survivors and nonsurvivors, but fluid balance was less positive in survivors because of higher fluid output in these patients. Fluid balances became negative after the third ICU day in survivors but remained positive in nonsurvivors. After adjustment for possible confounders in multivariable analysis, the 24-hour cumulative fluid balance was not associated with an increased hazard of 28-day in-hospital death. However, there was a stepwise increase in the hazard of death with higher quartiles of 3-day cumulative fluid balance in the whole population and after stratification according to the presence of septic shock.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients with sepsis, higher cumulative fluid balance at day 3 but not in the first 24 hours after ICU admission was independently associated with an increase in the hazard of death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27922878     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  67 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in the management of septic shock: a narrative review.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Maurizio Cecconi; Jeffrey Lipman; Flavia Machado; Sheila Nainan Myatra; Marlies Ostermann; Anders Perner; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jean-Louis Vincent; Keith R Walley
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Shooting for the bull's eye in septic shock.

Authors:  Kay Choong See; Tow Keang Lim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Vitamin C in sepsis.

Authors:  Sven-Olaf Kuhn; Konrad Meissner; Lena M Mayes; Karsten Bartels
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 4.  The surviving sepsis campaign: fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy research priorities in adult patients.

Authors:  Ishaq Lat; Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 5.  Early norepinephrine use in septic shock.

Authors:  Olfa Hamzaoui; Rui Shi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Evaluation and Predictors of Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Authors:  Hani I Kuttab; Joseph D Lykins; Michelle D Hughes; Kristen Wroblewski; Eric P Keast; Omobolawa Kukoyi; Jason A Kopec; Stephen Hall; Michael A Ward
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  The Restrictive IV Fluid Trial in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock (RIFTS): A Randomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Keith A Corl; Michael Prodromou; Roland C Merchant; Ilana Gareen; Sarah Marks; Debasree Banerjee; Timothy Amass; Adeel Abbasi; Cesar Delcompare; Amy Palmisciano; Jason Aliotta; Gregory Jay; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Liberal Versus Restrictive Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Early Septic Shock: Rationale for a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Wesley H Self; Matthew W Semler; Rinaldo Bellomo; Samuel M Brown; Bennett P deBoisblanc; Matthew C Exline; Adit A Ginde; Colin K Grissom; David R Janz; Alan E Jones; Kathleen D Liu; Stephen P J Macdonald; Chadwick D Miller; Pauline K Park; Lora A Reineck; Todd W Rice; Jay S Steingrub; Daniel Talmor; Donald M Yealy; Ivor S Douglas; Nathan I Shapiro
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 9.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

10.  Effect of a fluid bolus on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation (PrePARE): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David R Janz; Jonathan D Casey; Matthew W Semler; Derek W Russell; James Dargin; Derek J Vonderhaar; Kevin M Dischert; Jason R West; Susan Stempek; Joanne Wozniak; Nicholas Caputo; Brent E Heideman; Aline N Zouk; Swati Gulati; William S Stigler; Itay Bentov; Aaron M Joffe; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 30.700

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.