John G Laffey1, Tài Pham, Giacomo Bellani. 1. aDepartments of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Critical Illness and Injury Research Centre, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St Michael's Hospital bDepartments of Anesthesia, Physiology and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine University of Toronto cDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada dDepartment of Health Science, University of Milan-Bicocca eDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Timely recognition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may allow for more prompt management and less exacerbation of lung injury. However, the absence of a diagnostic test for ARDS means that the diagnosis of ARDS requires clinician recognition in what is usually a complicated and evolving illness. We review data concerning the extent of recognition of ARDS in the era of the Berlin definition of ARDS. RECENT FINDINGS: ARDS continues to be under-recognized - even in the era of the more recent 'Berlin' definition, and significant delay in its recognition is common. Factors contributing to under-recognition may include the complexity of ARDS biology, low specificity of the consensus (diagnostic) criteria, and concerns about reliable interpretation of the chest radiograph. Understandably, 'external' factors are also at play: ICU occupancy and higher patient to clinician ratio impair recognition of ARDS. Timely recognition of ARDS appears important, as it is associated with the use of higher PEEP, prone positioning and neuromuscular blockade which can lower mortality. Computer-aided decision tools seem diagnostically useful, and together with the integration of reliable biomarkers, may further enhance and speed recognition of this syndrome. SUMMARY: Significant numbers of patients with ARDS are still unrecognized by clinicians in the era of the Berlin definition of ARDS, with potentially important consequences for patient management and outcome.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Timely recognition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may allow for more prompt management and less exacerbation of lung injury. However, the absence of a diagnostic test for ARDS means that the diagnosis of ARDS requires clinician recognition in what is usually a complicated and evolving illness. We review data concerning the extent of recognition of ARDS in the era of the Berlin definition of ARDS. RECENT FINDINGS: ARDS continues to be under-recognized - even in the era of the more recent 'Berlin' definition, and significant delay in its recognition is common. Factors contributing to under-recognition may include the complexity of ARDS biology, low specificity of the consensus (diagnostic) criteria, and concerns about reliable interpretation of the chest radiograph. Understandably, 'external' factors are also at play: ICU occupancy and higher patient to clinician ratio impair recognition of ARDS. Timely recognition of ARDS appears important, as it is associated with the use of higher PEEP, prone positioning and neuromuscular blockade which can lower mortality. Computer-aided decision tools seem diagnostically useful, and together with the integration of reliable biomarkers, may further enhance and speed recognition of this syndrome. SUMMARY: Significant numbers of patients with ARDS are still unrecognized by clinicians in the era of the Berlin definition of ARDS, with potentially important consequences for patient management and outcome.
Authors: Matthew Schwede; Robert Y Lee; Hanjing Zhuo; Kirsten N Kangelaris; Alejandra Jauregui; Kathryn Vessel; Annika Belzer; Thomas Deiss; Michael A Matthay; Kathleen D Liu; Carolyn S Calfee Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Ken Kuljit S Parhar; Karolina Zjadewicz; Gwen E Knight; Andrea Soo; Jamie M Boyd; Danny J Zuege; Daniel J Niven; Christopher J Doig; Henry T Stelfox Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-05-17
Authors: Laura A Hagens; Fleur L I M Van der Ven; Nanon F L Heijnen; Marry R Smit; Hester A Gietema; Suzanne C Gerretsen; Marcus J Schultz; Dennis C J J Bergmans; Ronny M Schnabel; Lieuwe D J Bos Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-08-31
Authors: Andrew J Knighton; Kathryn G Kuttler; Pallavi Ranade-Kharkar; Lauren Allen; Taylor Throne; Jason R Jacobs; Lori Carpenter; Carrie Winberg; Kyle Johnson; Neer Shrestha; Jeffrey P Ferraro; Doug Wolfe; Ithan D Peltan; Rajendu Srivastava; Colin K Grissom Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2022-07-08
Authors: V Eric Kerchberger; Ryan M Brown; Matthew W Semler; Zhiguo Zhao; Tatsuki Koyama; David R Janz; Julie A Bastarache; Lorraine B Ware Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-07-06