E A Bye1,2, L A Harvey1, A Gambhir3, C Kataria3, J V Glinsky1, J L Bowden1, N Malik3, K E Tranter2, C P Lam4, J S White5, E J Gollan6, M Arora1, S C Gandevia7. 1. John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School/Northern, University of Sydney, C/O Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific Hwy, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Physiotherapy Department, Spinal Injury Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Physiotherapy Department, Indian Spinal Injury Centre, Sector - C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India. 4. Physiotherapy Department, Spinal Injury Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia. 5. Physiotherapy Department, Spinal Injury Unit, Royal Rehab, Ryde, New South Wales, Australia. 6. Physiotherapy Department, Queensland Spinal Cord Injuries Service, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 7. Neuroscience Research Australia and University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Within-participant randomised controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether strength training combined with usual care increases strength in partially paralysed muscles of people with recent spinal cord injury (SCI) more than usual care alone. SETTINGS: SCI units in Australia and India. METHODS:Thirty people with recent SCI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation participated in this 12-week trial. One of the following muscle groups was selected as the target muscle group for each participant: the elbow flexors, elbow extensors, knee flexors or knee extensors. The target muscle on one side of the body was randomly allocated to the experimental group and the same muscle on the other side of the body was allocated to the control group. Strength training was administered to the experimental muscle but not to the control muscle. Participants were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks later. The primary outcome was maximal isometric muscle strength, and the secondary outcomes were spasticity, fatigue and participants' perception of function and strength. RESULTS: There were no dropouts, and participants received 98% of the training sessions. The mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) between-group difference for isometric strength was 4.3 Nm (1.9-6.8) with a clinically meaningful treatment effect of 2.7 Nm. The mean (95% CI) between-group difference for spasticity was 0.03/5 points (-0.25 to 0.32). CONCLUSION:Strength training increases strength in partially paralysed muscles of people with recent SCI, although it is not clear whether the size of the treatment effect is clinically meaningful. Strength training has no deleterious effects on spasticity.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: Within-participant randomised controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether strength training combined with usual care increases strength in partially paralysed muscles of people with recent spinal cord injury (SCI) more than usual care alone. SETTINGS: SCI units in Australia and India. METHODS: Thirty people with recent SCI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation participated in this 12-week trial. One of the following muscle groups was selected as the target muscle group for each participant: the elbow flexors, elbow extensors, knee flexors or knee extensors. The target muscle on one side of the body was randomly allocated to the experimental group and the same muscle on the other side of the body was allocated to the control group. Strength training was administered to the experimental muscle but not to the control muscle. Participants were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks later. The primary outcome was maximal isometric muscle strength, and the secondary outcomes were spasticity, fatigue and participants' perception of function and strength. RESULTS: There were no dropouts, and participants received 98% of the training sessions. The mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) between-group difference for isometric strength was 4.3 Nm (1.9-6.8) with a clinically meaningful treatment effect of 2.7 Nm. The mean (95% CI) between-group difference for spasticity was 0.03/5 points (-0.25 to 0.32). CONCLUSION: Strength training increases strength in partially paralysed muscles of people with recent SCI, although it is not clear whether the size of the treatment effect is clinically meaningful. Strength training has no deleterious effects on spasticity.
Authors: Gerson E R Campos; Thomas J Luecke; Heather K Wendeln; Kumika Toma; Fredrick C Hagerman; Thomas F Murray; Kerry E Ragg; Nicholas A Ratamess; William J Kraemer; Robert S Staron Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Paulo Henrique Ferreira de Araujo Barbosa; Joanne V Glinsky; Emerson Fachin-Martins; Lisa A Harvey Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Elizabeth A Bye; Lisa A Harvey; Joanne V Glinsky; Bart Bolsterlee; Robert D Herbert Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Xiao-Na Xiang; Hui-Yan Zong; Yi Ou; Xi Yu; Hong Cheng; Chun-Ping Du; Hong-Chen He Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.262