Literature DB >> 27919751

Less head motion during MRI under task than resting-state conditions.

Willem Huijbers1, Koene R A Van Dijk2, Meta M Boenniger3, Rüdiger Stirnberg4, Monique M B Breteler3.   

Abstract

Head motion reduces data quality of neuroimaging data. In three functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) experiments we demonstrate that people make less head movements under task than resting-state conditions. In Experiment 1, we observed less head motion during a memory encoding task than during the resting-state condition. In Experiment 2, using publicly shared data from the UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics LA5c Study, we again found less head motion during several active task conditions than during a resting-state condition, although some task conditions also showed comparable motion. In the healthy controls, we found more head motion in men than in women and more motion with increasing age. When comparing clinical groups, we found that patients with a clinical diagnosis of bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia, move more compared to healthy controls or patients with ADHD. Both these experiments had a fixed acquisition order across participants, and we could not rule out that a first or last scan during a session might be particularly prone to more head motion. Therefore, we conducted Experiment 3, in which we collected several task and resting-state fMRI runs with an acquisition order counter-balanced. The results of Experiment 3 show again less head motion during several task conditions than during rest. Together these experiments demonstrate that small head motions occur during MRI even with careful instruction to remain still and fixation with foam pillows, but that head motion is lower when participants are engaged in a cognitive task. These finding may inform the choice of functional runs when studying difficult-to-scan populations, such as children or certain patient populations. Our findings also indicate that differences in head motion complicate direct comparisons of measures of functional neuronal networks between task and resting-state fMRI because of potential differences in data quality. In practice, a task to reduce head motion might be especially useful when acquiring structural MRI data such as T1/T2-weighted and diffusion MRI in research and clinical settings.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact; Data quality; Functional MRI; Movement; Neuroimaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27919751     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

1.  Scale-invariant rearrangement of resting state networks in the human brain under sustained stimulation.

Authors:  Silvia Tommasin; Daniele Mascali; Marta Moraschi; Tommaso Gili; Ibrahim Eid Hassan; Michela Fratini; Mauro DiNuzzo; Richard G Wise; Silvia Mangia; Emiliano Macaluso; Federico Giove
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Twitches, Blinks, and Fidgets: Important Generators of Ongoing Neural Activity.

Authors:  Patrick J Drew; Aaron T Winder; Qingguang Zhang
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 3.  Is it time to put rest to rest?

Authors:  Emily S Finn
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  A naturalistic neuroimaging database for understanding the brain using ecological stimuli.

Authors:  Sarah Aliko; Jiawen Huang; Florin Gheorghiu; Stefanie Meliss; Jeremy I Skipper
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  Time scale properties of task and resting-state functional connectivity: Detrended partial cross-correlation analysis.

Authors:  Jaime S Ide; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Distinct Patterns of Atypical Functional Connectivity in Lower-Functioning Autism.

Authors:  Maya A Reiter; Lisa E Mash; Annika C Linke; Christopher H Fong; Inna Fishman; Ralph-Axel Müller
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-08-30

7.  Head motion during fMRI tasks is reduced in children and adults if participants take breaks.

Authors:  Tobias W Meissner; Jon Walbrin; Marisa Nordt; Kami Koldewyn; Sarah Weigelt
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  Age differences in head motion and estimates of cortical morphology.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Large-scale intrinsic connectivity is consistent across varying task demands.

Authors:  Paulina Kieliba; Sasidhar Madugula; Nicola Filippini; Eugene P Duff; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predicting Ventral Striatal Activation During Reward Anticipation From Functional Connectivity at Rest.

Authors:  Asako Mori; Manfred Klöbl; Go Okada; Murray Bruce Reed; Masahiro Takamura; Paul Michenthaler; Koki Takagaki; Patricia Anna Handschuh; Satoshi Yokoyama; Matej Murgas; Naho Ichikawa; Gregor Gryglewski; Chiyo Shibasaki; Marie Spies; Atsuo Yoshino; Andreas Hahn; Yasumasa Okamoto; Rupert Lanzenberger; Shigeto Yamawaki; Siegfried Kasper
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.