Maya A Reiter1, Lisa E Mash1, Annika C Linke2, Christopher H Fong2, Inna Fishman1, Ralph-Axel Müller3. 1. San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, California; Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. 2. Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. 3. San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, California; Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. Electronic address: rmueller@sdsu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Functional magnetic resonance imaging research on autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) has been largely limited to individuals with near-average intelligence. Although cognitive impairment is common in ASDs, functional network connectivity in this population remains poorly understood. Specifically, it remains unknown whether lower-functioning individuals exhibit exacerbated connectivity abnormalities similar to those previously detected in higher-functioning samples or specific divergent patterns of connectivity. METHODS: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 88 children (44 ASD, 44 typically developing; average age: 11 years) were included. Based on IQ, individuals with ASDs were assigned to either a lower-functioning group (mean IQ = 77 ± 6) or a higher-functioning group (mean IQ = 123 ± 8). Two typically developing comparison groups were matched to these groups on head motion, handedness, and age. Seeds in the medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, posterior superior temporal sulcus, insula, and amygdala were used to contrast whole-brain functional connectivity across groups. RESULTS: Lower-functioning ASD participants (compared with higher-functioning ASD participants) showed significant underconnectivity within the default mode network and the ventral visual stream. Higher-functioning ASD participants (compared with matched typically developing participants) showed significantly decreased anticorrelations among default mode, salience, and task-positive regions. Effect sizes of detected differences were large (Cohen's d > 1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Lower- and higher-functioning individuals with ASDs demonstrated distinct patterns of atypical connectivity. Findings suggest a gross pattern of predominantly reduced network integration in lower-functioning ASDs (affecting default mode and visual networks) and predominantly reduced network segregation in higher-functioning ASDs. Results indicate the need for stratification by general functional level in studies of functional connectivity in ASDs.
BACKGROUND: Functional magnetic resonance imaging research on autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) has been largely limited to individuals with near-average intelligence. Although cognitive impairment is common in ASDs, functional network connectivity in this population remains poorly understood. Specifically, it remains unknown whether lower-functioning individuals exhibit exacerbated connectivity abnormalities similar to those previously detected in higher-functioning samples or specific divergent patterns of connectivity. METHODS: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 88 children (44 ASD, 44 typically developing; average age: 11 years) were included. Based on IQ, individuals with ASDs were assigned to either a lower-functioning group (mean IQ = 77 ± 6) or a higher-functioning group (mean IQ = 123 ± 8). Two typically developing comparison groups were matched to these groups on head motion, handedness, and age. Seeds in the medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, posterior superior temporal sulcus, insula, and amygdala were used to contrast whole-brain functional connectivity across groups. RESULTS: Lower-functioning ASDparticipants (compared with higher-functioning ASDparticipants) showed significant underconnectivity within the default mode network and the ventral visual stream. Higher-functioning ASDparticipants (compared with matched typically developing participants) showed significantly decreased anticorrelations among default mode, salience, and task-positive regions. Effect sizes of detected differences were large (Cohen's d > 1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Lower- and higher-functioning individuals with ASDs demonstrated distinct patterns of atypical connectivity. Findings suggest a gross pattern of predominantly reduced network integration in lower-functioning ASDs (affecting default mode and visual networks) and predominantly reduced network segregation in higher-functioning ASDs. Results indicate the need for stratification by general functional level in studies of functional connectivity in ASDs.
Authors: M E Raichle; A M MacLeod; A Z Snyder; W J Powers; D A Gusnard; G L Shulman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-01-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Patricia Shih; Brandon Keehn; Jessica K Oram; Kelly M Leyden; Christopher L Keown; Ralph-Axel Müller Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Shulamite A Green; Leanna Hernandez; Nim Tottenham; Kate Krasileva; Susan Y Bookheimer; Mirella Dapretto Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: J Salmi; U Roine; E Glerean; J Lahnakoski; T Nieminen-von Wendt; P Tani; S Leppämäki; L Nummenmaa; I P Jääskeläinen; S Carlson; P Rintahaka; M Sams Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Aina Eill; Afrooz Jahedi; Yangfeifei Gao; Jiwandeep S Kohli; Christopher H Fong; Seraphina Solders; Ruth A Carper; Faramarz Valafar; Barbara A Bailey; Ralph-Axel Müller Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2019-08-23
Authors: Mary Beth Nebel; Daniel E Lidstone; Liwei Wang; David Benkeser; Stewart H Mostofsky; Benjamin B Risk Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 7.400
Authors: Daegyeom Kim; Joo Young Lee; Byeong Chang Jeong; Ja-Hye Ahn; Johanna Inhyang Kim; Eun Soo Lee; Hyuna Kim; Hyun Ju Lee; Cheol E Han Journal: Autism Res Date: 2021-09-16 Impact factor: 4.633
Authors: Dina R Dajani; Catherine A Burrows; Paola Odriozola; Adriana Baez; Mary Beth Nebel; Stewart H Mostofsky; Lucina Q Uddin Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Terisa P Gabrielsen; Jeff S Anderson; Kevin G Stephenson; Jonathan Beck; Jace B King; Ryan Kellems; David N Top; Nicholas C C Russell; Emily Anderberg; Rebecca A Lundwall; Blake Hansen; Mikle South Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 7.509