Keehyuck Lee1, Se Young Jung2, Hee Hwang3, Sooyoung Yoo4, Hyun Young Baek5, Rong-Min Baek6, Seok Kim7. 1. Center for Medical Informatics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea; Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea; Department of Orthopedics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. Electronic address: chrisruga@snubh.org. 2. Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea; Department of Orthopedics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. Electronic address: imsyjung@gmail.com. 3. Center for Medical Informatics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea; Department of Orthopedics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea; Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. Electronic address: neuroandy@snubh.org. 4. Center for Medical Informatics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea; Department of Orthopedics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. Electronic address: yoosoo0@snubh.org. 5. Center for Medical Informatics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea; Department of Orthopedics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. Electronic address: bhy210@snubh.org. 6. Department of Plastic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea; Department of Orthopedics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. Electronic address: ronbaek@snu.ac.kr. 7. Center for Medical Informatics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea; Department of Orthopedics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. Electronic address: kims@snubh.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new concept of medical dashboard system called BESTBoard. Such a system was implemented in all wards in a tertiary academic hospital to explore the development process, core designs, functions, usability and feasibility. METHODS: The task-force team made user interface designs for 6 months based on a need analysis. Hardware configuration and software development was carried out for 3 months. We conducted a survey of 383 physicians and nurses to determine the usability and feasibility of the system. RESULTS: In March 2012, the system was installed in all wards, including the intensive care units, emergency rooms, operation rooms, and even delivery rooms. Healthcare professionals had access to all information of EHRs optimized for a large 55-inch touchscreen. The satisfaction rate of BESTBoard users was high, with a mean of 3.3 points. Voluntary users tended to consider BESTBoard as a good system that is useful for team round visits, interdisciplinary team approach, and collecting the status of the hospital rooms. Elderly users didn't tend to think of BESTBoard as a useful tool for interdisciplinary team approach and collecting the status of the hospital rooms. Greater expectations regarding work performance affected the users' attitudes positively. A positive attitude toward using the system resulted in consistent real usage and health care professionals' satisfaction with the new dashboard system. CONCLUSIONS: A new concept of hospital dashboard system proved to be feasible and useful in delivering health information to healthcare professionals. A positive attitude and an expectation regarding work performance were important factors for intention to use the system. This finding can serve for developing new systems to present health information effectively. Further studies will be needed to evaluate the extent to which BESTBoard can have a positive impact on clinical care outcomes and work performance. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new concept of medical dashboard system called BESTBoard. Such a system was implemented in all wards in a tertiary academic hospital to explore the development process, core designs, functions, usability and feasibility. METHODS: The task-force team made user interface designs for 6 months based on a need analysis. Hardware configuration and software development was carried out for 3 months. We conducted a survey of 383 physicians and nurses to determine the usability and feasibility of the system. RESULTS: In March 2012, the system was installed in all wards, including the intensive care units, emergency rooms, operation rooms, and even delivery rooms. Healthcare professionals had access to all information of EHRs optimized for a large 55-inch touchscreen. The satisfaction rate of BESTBoard users was high, with a mean of 3.3 points. Voluntary users tended to consider BESTBoard as a good system that is useful for team round visits, interdisciplinary team approach, and collecting the status of the hospital rooms. Elderly users didn't tend to think of BESTBoard as a useful tool for interdisciplinary team approach and collecting the status of the hospital rooms. Greater expectations regarding work performance affected the users' attitudes positively. A positive attitude toward using the system resulted in consistent real usage and health care professionals' satisfaction with the new dashboard system. CONCLUSIONS: A new concept of hospital dashboard system proved to be feasible and useful in delivering health information to healthcare professionals. A positive attitude and an expectation regarding work performance were important factors for intention to use the system. This finding can serve for developing new systems to present health information effectively. Further studies will be needed to evaluate the extent to which BESTBoard can have a positive impact on clinical care outcomes and work performance. Copyright Â
Authors: Rebecca Randell; Natasha Alvarado; Lynn McVey; Joanne Greenhalgh; Robert M West; Amanda Farrin; Chris Gale; Roger Parslow; Justin Keen; Mai Elshehaly; Roy A Ruddle; Julia Lake; Mamas Mamas; Richard Feltbower; Dawn Dowding Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Keehyuck Lee; Kahyun Lim; Se Young Jung; Hyerim Ji; Kyungpyo Hong; Hee Hwang; Ho-Young Lee Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Regina Richter Lagha; Zachary Burningham; Brian C Sauer; Jianwei Leng; Celena Peters; Tina Huynh; Shardool Patel; Ahmad S Halwani; B Josea Kramer Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 2.342