| Literature DB >> 27916792 |
Hongying Cui1,2, Yucheng Sun3, Fajun Chen4, Youjun Zhang5, Feng Ge6.
Abstract
The effects of elevated atmospheric ozone (O₃) levels on herbivorous insects have been well studied, but little is known about the combined effects of elevated O₃ and virus infection on herbivorous insect performance. Using open-top chambers in the field, we determined the effects of elevated O₃ and Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) infection on wild-type (Wt) tomato and 35S tomato (jasmonic acid (JA) defense-enhanced genotype) in association with whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius biotype B. Elevated O₃ and TYLCV infection, alone and in combination, significantly reduced the contents of soluble sugars and free amino acids, increased the contents of total phenolics and condensed tannins, and increased salicylic acid (SA) content and the expression of SA-related genes in leaves. The JA signaling pathway was upregulated by elevated O₃, but downregulated by TYLCV infection and O₃ + TYLCV infection. Regardless of plant genotype, elevated O₃, TYLCV infection, or O₃ + TYLCV infection significantly decreased B. tabaci fecundity and abundance. These results suggest that elevated O₃ and TYLCV infection, alone and in combination, reduce the nutrients available for B. tabaci, increase SA content and SA-related gene expression, and increase secondary metabolites, resulting in decreases in fecundity and abundance of B. tabaci in both tomato genotypes.Entities:
Keywords: Bemisia tabaci; Tomato yellow leaf curl virus; elevated O3; jasmonic acid; salicylic acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27916792 PMCID: PMC5187764 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17121964
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Effects of O3 level, TYLCV infection, and plant genotype on B. tabaci fecundity (egg/pair) and abundance (number/plant), plant fresh biomass, plant height of tomato. F and p values from ANOVA are shown.
| Measured Indices | Value | Treatment(df) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O3 (1, 184) | TYLCV (1, 184) | Tomato Genotype (1, 184) | O3 × TYLCV (1, 184) | O3 × Genotype (1, 184) | TYLCV × Genotype (1, 184) | O3 × TYLCV × Genotype (1, 184) | ||
| Fresh biomass | 930.88 | 703.90 | 4.72 | 50.27 | 0.06 | 50.27 | 4.77 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.03 | ||
| Plant height | 297.10 | 212.51 | 5.05 | 6.83 | 0.61 | 40.02 | 8.61 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Fecundity at one week | 164.26 | 132.49 | 6.86 | 14.61 | 0.02 | 3.04 | 0.75 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.08 | 0.39 | ||
| Fecundity at three weeks | 164.52 | 90.42 | 5.14 | 15.33 | 2.15 | 0.19 | 0.58 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.67 | 0.45 | ||
| Abundance at four weeks | 1768.14 | 908.72 | 16.88 | 89.48 | 5.49 | 151.95 | 0.33 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.57 | ||
| Abundance at six weeks | 1246.29 | 851.42 | 4.12 | 100.69 | 18.25 | 131.01 | 0.30 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.58 | ||
“Weeks” refer to the start of the oviposition period of the single insect pairs (that occurred three weeks, four weeks and six weeks after the beginning of the experiment).
Figure 1Fresh biomass (A); and plant height (B) of two tomato genotypes (Wt and 35S) grown under ambient and elevated O3 with and without TYLCV infection for six weeks. Control refers to plants grown under ambient O3 and without TYLCV. O3 refers to uninfected plants grown under elevated O3. TYLCV refers to TYLCV-infected plants grown under ambient O3. O3 + TYLCV refers to TYLCV-infected plants grown under elevated O3. Each value represents the average (±SE) of 24 replicates. Different lowercase letters within a row indicate significant differences among the four treatments in a specific tomato cultivar, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the two tomato genotypes within the same treatment (Tukey’s test: p < 0.05).
Effects of O3 level, TYLCV infection, and plant genotype on biochemical properties of tomato. F and p values from ANOVA are shown.
| Measured Indices | Value | Treatment(df) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O3 (1, 24) | TYLCV (1, 24) | Tomato Genotype (1, 24) | O3 × TYLCV (1, 24) | O3 × Genotype (1, 24) | TYLCV × Genotype (1, 24) | O3 × TYLCV × Genotype (1, 24) | ||
| Soluble sugars | 307.79 | 156.07 | 4.89 | 9.85 | 4.01 | 12.86 | 0.56 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.46 | ||
| Free amino acids | 297.79 | 238.19 | 6.47 | 4.80 | 11.22 | 5.11 | 7.75 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | ||
| Condensed tannins | 681.27 | 269.61 | 52.13 | 21.25 | 0.18 | 104.37 | 5.37 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.03 | ||
| Total phenolics | 159.07 | 96.41 | 11.39 | 12.30 | 2.04 | 22.38 | 7.74 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.01 | ||
| SA a | 590.53 | 503.75 | 4.42 | 103.99 | 1.83 | 11.67 | 7.68 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.01 | ||
| JA b | 304.52 | 641.86 | 136.01 | 26.12 | 17.05 | 12.89 | 0.48 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | ||
| 515.41 | 406.44 | 15.52 | 24.91 | 4.15 | 29.07 | 9.94 | ||
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 926.49 | 428.75 | 8.23 | 12.23 | 1.15 | 97.03 | 33.08 | ||
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 984.33 | 1430.40 | 139.61 | 601.29 | 32.77 | 47.78 | 16.62 | ||
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 829.22 | 1170.85 | 160.05 | 428.72 | 70.30 | 94.43 | 53.38 | ||
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
a Salicylic acid; b Jasmonic acid; c Phenylalanine ammonia lyase; d Pathogenesis-related protein; e Lipoxygenases; f Proteinase inhibitor.
Figure 2Concentrations of soluble sugars (A); free amino acids (B); condensed tannins (C); and total phenolics (D) in the two tomato genotypes (Wt and 35S) grown under ambient and elevated O3 with and without TYLCV infection after six weeks. Treatments are explained in Figure 1. Each value represents the average (±SE) of four replicates. Different lowercase letters within a row indicate significant differences among the four treatments in a specific tomato cultivar, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between tomato genotypes within the same treatment (Tukey’s test: p < 0.05).
Figure 3Concentrations of (A) salicylic acid (SA); and (B) jasmonic acid (JA) in the two tomato genotypes (Wt and 35S) grown under ambient and elevated O3 with and without TYLCV infection after six weeks. Treatments are explained in Figure 1. Each value represents the average (±SE) of four replicates. Different lowercase letters within a row indicate significant differences among the four treatments in a specific tomato cultivar, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the two tomato genotypes within the same treatment (Tukey’s test: p < 0.05).
Figure 4The relative expression of genes encoding (A) phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL); (B) pathogenesis-related protein (PR1); (C) lipoxygenases (LOX); and (D) proteinase inhibitor (PI1) in the two tomato genotypes (Wt and 35S) grown under ambient and elevated O3 with and without TYLCV infection after six weeks. Treatments are explained in Figure 1. Each value represents the average (±SE) of four replicates. Different lowercase letters within a row indicate significant differences among the four treatments in a specific tomato cultivar, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the two tomato genotypes within the same treatment (Tukey’s test: p < 0.05).
Figure 5B. tabaci fecundity (A) at one week; and (B) at three weeks; and B. tabaci numbers per plant (C) at four weeks; and (D) at six weeks on two tomato genotypes (Wt and 35S) grown under ambient and elevated O3 with and without TYLCV infection. Treatments are explained in Figure 1. Each value represents the average (±SE) of 24 replicates. Different lowercase letters within a row indicate significant differences among the four treatments in a specific tomato cultivar, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the two tomato genotypes within the same treatment (Tukey’s test: p < 0.05). “Weeks” refer to the start of the oviposition period of the single insect pairs (that occurred three weeks, four weeks and six weeks after the beginning of the experiment).
Pearson correlations between B. tabaci fecundity (egg/pair) and abundance (number/plant) and biochemical properties of tomato leaves.
| Tomato Constituents | Fecundity at One Week | Fecundity at Three Weeks | Abundance at Four Weeks | Abundance at Six Weeks | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | df | df | df | |||||||||
| Soluble sugars | 6 | 0.995 | 0.000 | 6 | 0.989 | 0.000 | 6 | 0.981 | 0.000 | 6 | 0.970 | 0.000 |
| Free amino acids | 6 | 0.984 | 0.000 | 6 | 0.973 | 0.000 | 6 | 0.955 | 0.000 | 6 | 0.928 | 0.001 |
| Condensed tannins | 6 | −0.952 | 0.000 | 6 | −0.966 | 0.000 | 6 | −0.901 | 0.002 | 6 | −0.827 | 0.011 |
| Total phenolics | 6 | −0.940 | 0.001 | 6 | −0.936 | 0.001 | 6 | −0.872 | 0.005 | 6 | −0.802 | 0.017 |
| SA a | 6 | −0.908 | 0.002 | 6 | −0.912 | 0.002 | 6 | −0.853 | 0.007 | 6 | −0.775 | 0.024 |
| 6 | −0.963 | 0.000 | 6 | −0.955 | 0.000 | 6 | −0.909 | 0.002 | 6 | −0.853 | 0.007 | |
| 6 | −0.966 | 0.000 | 6 | −0.970 | 0.000 | 6 | −0.943 | 0.000 | 6 | −0.869 | 0.005 | |
a Salicylic acid; b Phenylalanine ammonia lyase; c Pathogenesis-related protein. “Weeks” refer to the start of the oviposition period of the single insect pairs (that occurred three weeks, four weeks and six weeks after the beginning of the experiment).