| Literature DB >> 27916487 |
Mohd Mujahid1, Talib Hussain2, Hefazat Hussain Siddiqui3, Arshad Hussain3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erythrina indica Lam. traditionally used in the treatment of laxative, diuretic, worm infestation, liver ailment and joints pain.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-oxidant; Anti-tubercular drugs; Erythrina indica; Hepatoprotective
Year: 2017 PMID: 27916487 PMCID: PMC5377476 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2016.10.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Fig. 1Effect of E. indica on body weight of isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) induced hepatotoxicity in experimental groups of rats. Group I – normal control, Group II – INH + RIF (50 mg/kg each), Group III – E. indica 100 mg/kg, Group IV – E. indica 100 mg/kg, and Group V – silymarin 100 mg. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of 6 rats in each group. P values: #<0.001 compared with respective normal control group I P values: ∗<0.05 and ∗∗<0.001 compared with group II (INH + RIF).
Fig. 2Effect of E. indica on liver weight and relative liver weight of isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) induced hepatotoxicity in experimental groups of rats. Group I – normal control, Group II – INH + RIF (50 mg/kg each), Group III – E. indica 100 mg/kg, Group IV – E. indica 100 mg/kg, and Group V – silymarin 100 mg. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of 6 rats in each group. P values: #<0.001 compared with respective normal control group I P values: ∗<0.05 and ∗∗<0.001 compared with group II (INH + RIF).
Effect of E. indica on biochemical parameters.
| Groups and treatments | SGPT (IU/L) | SGOT (IU/L) | ALP (IU/L) | SBL (mg/dl) | LDH (U/L) | TP (g/L) | ALB (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 46.06 ± 1.70 | 86.16 ± 1.01 | 84.4.59 ± 3.389 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 386.5 ± 6.27 | 6.98 ± 0.345 | 2.814 ± 0.049 |
| INH + RIF (50 mg/kg each) | 152.51 ± 3.67# | 158.33 ± 1.03# | 252.36 ± 3.190# | 1.72 ± 0.247# | 601.83 ± 10.8# | 2.98 ± 0.170# | 1.39 ± 0.09# |
| 129.66 ± 5.61∗∗ | 127.16 ± 7.24∗∗∗ | 211.2 ± 5.472∗ | 1.10 ± 0.04∗ | 543.42 ± 17.93∗ | 3.97 ± 0.33∗ | 2.01 ± 0.04∗ | |
| 102.0.33 ± 5.08∗∗∗ | 106.83 ± 1.27∗∗∗ | 134.8 ± 12.351∗∗∗ | 0.99 ± 0.03∗∗ | 426 ± 10.80∗∗∗ | 5.54 ± 0.96∗∗ | 2.3 ± 0.14∗∗ | |
| Silymarin 100 mg/kg | 83.15 ± 6.13∗∗∗ | 88.61 ± 2.43∗∗∗ | 93.2 ± 1.158∗∗∗ | 0.81 ± 0.02∗∗∗ | 391.83 ± 15.09∗∗∗ | 5.67 ± 0.22∗∗∗ | 2.87 ± 0.05∗∗∗ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of 6 rats in each group.
P values: ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, ∗∗∗<0.001 compared with group II (INH + RIF).
P values: #<0.001 compared with respective normal control group I.
Effect of E. indica on SOD, CAT, GSH and LPO.
| Groups and treatments | SOD (Units/mg tissue protein) | CAT ( μ mol H2O2/mg tissue protein) | GSH (μg/mg tissue protein) | LPO (μ mole/mg tissue protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 4.92 ± 0.431 | 17.08 ± 0.21 | 5.21 ± 0.072 | 27.44 ± 1.42 |
| INH + RIF (50 mg/kg each) | 1.76 ± 0.077# | 8.03 ± 0.34# | 1.90 ± 0.16# | 82.6 ± 0.16# |
| 2.69 ± 0.752∗ | 10.20 ± 0.58∗ | 2.15 ± 0.083 | 63.12 ± 5.39∗∗ | |
| 3.712 ± 0.056∗∗ | 12.59 ± 0.42∗∗∗ | 2.48 ± 0.99∗ | 42.6 ± 1.53∗∗∗ | |
| Silymarin 100 mg/kg | 4.11 ± 0.97∗∗∗ | 14 0.13 ± 0.47∗∗∗ | 3.45 ± 0.11∗∗∗ | 36.4 ± 1.63∗∗∗ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of 6 rats in each group.
P values: #<0.001 compared with respective normal control group I.
P values: ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, ∗∗∗<0.001 compared with group II (INH + RIF).
Fig. 3Effect of methanolic extracts of E. indica against antitubercular drugs (INH + RIF) induced histopathological changes in experimental groups of rats (H&E staining @ 40X). (A) Normal rats, (B) Liver section of anti-tubercular drugs (INH + RIF) induced rat liver, (C and D) Liver section of rats treated with methanolic extract of E. indica 100 and 200 mg/kg, (E) Liver section of silymarin treated rats.
Histopathologic grading of liver necrosis in experimental rats.
| Groups | Treatments | Histopathological grading |
|---|---|---|
| Group I | normal control | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| Group II | INH + RIF (50 mg/kg each) | 3.39 ± 0.98# |
| Group III | 2.54 ± 1.04 | |
| Group IV | 1.56 ± 0.95∗ | |
| Group V | Silymarin 100 mg/kg | 1.28 ± 0.78∗ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of 6 rats in each group.
P values: #<0.001 compared with respective normal control group I.
P values: ∗<0.05 compared with group II (INH + RIF).