Literature DB >> 27914849

Age-Related Variations of Muscle Mass, Strength, and Physical Performance in Community-Dwellers: Results From the Milan EXPO Survey.

Francesco Landi1, Riccardo Calvani2, Matteo Tosato2, Anna Maria Martone2, Domenico Fusco2, Alex Sisto2, Elena Ortolani2, Giulia Savera2, Sara Salini2, Emanuele Marzetti2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Declining muscle mass and function are hallmarks of the aging process. The preservation of muscle trophism may protect against various negative health outcomes. Age- and sex-specific curves of muscle mass, strength, and function, using data from a large sample of community-dwelling people, are necessary.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two surveys (Longevity Check-up and Very Important Protein [VIP]), conducted during EXPO 2015 in Milan, consisted of a population assessment aimed at evaluating the prevalence of specific health metrics in subjects outside of a research setting (n = 3206), with a special focus on muscle mass, strength, and function. Muscle mass was estimated by using mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) and calf circumference of the dominant side. Muscle strength and function were assessed through handgrip strength testing and repeated chair stand test, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean age of 3206 participants in the Longevity Check-up and VIP surveys was 51.9 years (SD 15.6, range 18-98 years), and 1694 (52.8%) were women. Cross-sectional inspection suggests that both calf circumference and MAMC decline nonlinearly with age and the rate of decline varies by gender. These measures are stable until 50 years and then begin to decrease slightly with age, with the effect being more evident in men than in women. The main effect of the age category was observed in muscle strength and physical performance parameters. Muscle strength declined significantly after 45 years of age, both in men and women (P < .001). The muscle quality of the upper extremities, defined as handgrip strength divided by MAMC, declined significantly with aging, as well (P < .001). The time to complete the chair stand test was similar from 18 years to 40 to 44 years, and then a linear decline in performing the test across age groups was observed, with an increased time of more than 3 seconds, both in men and women (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Muscle mass and strength curves may be used to extract reference values for subsequent use in research as well as in the clinical setting. In particular, the analyses of trajectories of muscle parameters may help identify cutoffs for the estimation of risk of adverse events.
Copyright © 2016 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sarcopenia; Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); handgrip; physical function

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914849     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  41 in total

Review 1.  A Narrative Review of Handgrip Strength and Cognitive Functioning: Bringing a New Characteristic to Muscle Memory.

Authors:  Keith A Shaughnessy; Kyle J Hackney; Brian C Clark; William J Kraemer; Donna J Terbizan; Ryan R Bailey; Ryan McGrath
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  Comparison of spinal alignment, muscular strength, and quality of life between women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  N Miyakoshi; D Kudo; M Hongo; Y Kasukawa; Y Ishikawa; Y Shimada
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Sarcopenia, Obesity and Sarcopenia Obesity in Comparison: Prevalence, Metabolic Profile, and Key Differences: Results from WCHAT Study.

Authors:  X Liu; Q Hao; J Yue; L Hou; X Xia; W Zhao; Y Zhang; M Ge; N Ge; B Dong
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Are Health Behaviors and Self-Rated Health Related to Cardiovascular Health and Functional Performance? Results from the Lookup 7+ Cross-Sectional Survey among Persons Aged 65+.

Authors:  H M Rempe; R Calvani; E Marzetti; A Picca; C C Sieber; E Freiberger; F Landi
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Muscle Strength and Functional Limitations: Preserving Function in Older Mexican Americans.

Authors:  Ryan McGrath; Sheria G Robinson-Lane; Mark D Peterson; Ryan R Bailey; Brenda M Vincent
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  An Investigation of the Association between Transversus Abdominis Myofascial Structure and Activation with Age in Healthy Adults using Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Nathaly Gaudreault; Justine Benoît-Piau; Jan Paul van Wingerden; Carla Stecco; Frédérique Daigle; Guillaume Léonard
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-08-01

7.  HAND GRIP STRENGTH IN SENIOR ATHLETES: NORMATIVE DATA AND COMMUNITY-DWELLING COMPARISONS.

Authors:  Becca Jordre; William Schweinle
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-08

Review 8.  Nutrition for Older Athletes: Focus on Sex-Differences.

Authors:  Barbara Strasser; Dominik Pesta; Jörn Rittweger; Johannes Burtscher; Martin Burtscher
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Impact of Malnutrition Status on Muscle Parameter Changes over a 5-Year Follow-Up of Community-Dwelling Older Adults from the SarcoPhAge Cohort.

Authors:  Laetitia Lengelé; Olivier Bruyère; Charlotte Beaudart; Jean-Yves Reginster; Médéa Locquet
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Calf circumference: cutoff values from the NHANES 1999-2006.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Ali Mehrnezhad; Nariman Razaviarab; Thiago G Barbosa-Silva; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.