Literature DB >> 27914763

Management of suspected common bile duct stone: diagnostic yield of current guidelines.

Ufuk B Kuzu1, Bülent Ödemiş2, Selçuk Dişibeyaz2, Erkan Parlak2, Erkin Öztaş2, Fatih Saygılı2, Hakan Yıldız2, Mustafa Kaplan2, Orhan Coskun2, Adem Aksoy2, Derya Arı2, Nuretdin Suna2, Ertuğrul Kayaçetin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) has recently published a guideline for suspected CBDS with the intention of reducing unnecessary ERCP and thereby complications. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the ASGE guideline.
METHODS: Data of patients who underwent ERCP with suspected CBDS were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified into high, intermediate and low risk groups based on predictors that have been suggested by the ASGE. Very strong predictors of the presence of ductal stones included: CBDS on transabdominal ultrasonography (US), clinical ascending cholangitis or total bilirubin (TBIL) >4 mg/dL). Strong predictors included dilated CBD >6 mm on US with gallbladder in situ and TBIL level of 1.8-4.0 mg/dL whereas moderate predictor included abnormal liver biochemical test other than bilirubin, age more than 55 years and clinical findings of biliary pancreatitis.
RESULTS: Of 888 enrolled patients, 704 had CBDS demonstrated by ERCP and the remainder did not. All very strong and strong predictors were found to be significantly higher among patients who had CBDS. Detection of CBDS by ultrasonography and a dilated common biliary duct were observed to be independent risk factors associated with the existence of CBDS. The high risk group had a high (86.7%) positive predictive value (PPV), however, sensitivity and specificity were observed to be moderate (67.8% and 60.3% respectively). PPV was 67.9% in the intermediate risk group and the sensitivity and specificity were very low (31.9% and 42.3%). DISCUSSION: The probability of CBDS was observed to be high in the intermediate and high risk groups. However due to low sensitivity and specificity values, the ASGE guideline needs additional or different predictors.
Copyright © 2016 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914763     DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the 2010 ASGE non-invasive predictors of choledocholithiasis and comparison to the 2019 ASGE predictors.

Authors:  Louie Wang; Sarah Mirzaie; Tavit Dunnsiri; Formosa Chen; Holly Wilhalme; Ian T MacQueen; Henry Cryer; Anaar Eastoak-Siletz; Michelle Guan; Callie Cuff; James H Tabibian
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-24

2.  Evaluation of the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2019 and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines' performances for choledocholithiasis prediction in clinically suspected patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Suppadech Tunruttanakul; Borirak Chareonsil; Kotchakorn Verasmith; Jayanton Patumanond; Chatchai Mingmalairak
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Compliance to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography according to current guidelines and adverse outcomes of suspected choledocholithiasis in an acute care setting.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Almaslamani; Rakan Aldusari; Hassan Arishi; Ahmed Alaamri; Faisal Almudaiheem; Sami Almutairi; Abdulhakim Alshuraymi; Sami El-Boghdadly
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Use of combined laboratory and ultrasonography results to select patients for biliary tract imaging or intervention: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Joseph Thompson; Jonaid Mohammed; Christopher Smith; James Prince; Charlotte Lisberg; Leo Watton; Nathan Peter; Whajong Lee; Vivek Trivedi; Nicholas Hobbs; Jigar Shah; Rao Muhammad Asaf Khan; Sanjay Dalmia; Sohail Malik; Moustafa Mansour
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2019

5.  Test Performance Characteristics of Dynamic Liver Enzyme Trends in the Prediction of Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Yang Lei; B Cord Lethebe; Erin Wishart; Fateh Bazerbachi; B Joseph Elmunzer; Nirav Thosani; James L Buxbaum; Yen-I Chen; Sydney Bass; Martin J Cole; Christian Turbide; Darren R Brenner; Steven J Heitman; Rachid Mohamed; Nauzer Forbes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Intraoperative cholangiography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis: A prospective study in a second-level hospital.

Authors:  Gustavo Angel Gómez-Torres; Jaime González-Hernández; Carlos Rene López-Lizárraga; Eliseo Navarro-Muñiz; Odeth Sherlyne Ortega-García; Francisco Manuel Bonnet-Lemus; Francisco Manuel Abarca-Rendon; Liliana Faviola De la Cerda-Trujillo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Evaluating the Revised American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Common Bile Duct Stone Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jake S Jacob; Michelle E Lee; Erin Y Chew; Aaron P Thrift; Robert J Sealock
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2020-11-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.