Literature DB >> 35277770

Compliance to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography according to current guidelines and adverse outcomes of suspected choledocholithiasis in an acute care setting.

Abdulrahman Almaslamani1, Rakan Aldusari2, Hassan Arishi3, Ahmed Alaamri4, Faisal Almudaiheem3, Sami Almutairi5, Abdulhakim Alshuraymi6, Sami El-Boghdadly3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are common among patients who underwent cholecystectomy. However, few studies have investigated the compliance with the guidelines for the prediction of choledochlithiasis (CL). Therefore, we aim to study the compliance with the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines for the identification of CL in a major hospital in Saudi Arabia's capital.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review on adult patients admitted to emergency department at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh with gallstones between January 2016 and January 2019. Our data collection includes demographics and level of suspicion based on Transabdominal Ultrasound, liver function, amylase, and lipase tests. We then determined the likelihood of CL based on ASGE guidelines in order to assess the adherence to ASGE guidelines, the procedure's outcomes and adverse outcomes.
RESULTS: We identified 826 patients who met the study's criteria: 384 (46.4%) were compliant, while 442 (53.6%) were non-compliant with ASGE guidelines. There was a significant association between compliance and the presence of stones on ERCP in high likelihood patients. 48 (21.3%) of total ERCP procedures among all the likelihoods had adverse outcomes. 13 (40.6%) of non-compliant ERCP performed in intermediate likelihood have experienced adverse outcomes. There was a significant association between having adverse outcomes and being non-complaint with ASGE guidelines.
CONCLUSION: Despite ASGE guidelines' recommendations, a third of high likelihood cases and the majority of intermediate likelihood cases were non-compliant. Additionally, the current guidelines for the intermediate group are somewhat vague, giving ample leeway for patients to be placed in the intermediate group, which might subject them to unnecessary interventions. To conclude, there was a great lack of compliance with ASGE guidelines that is significantly associated with adverse outcomes. Hence, reassessing the current guidelines and monitoring healthcare facilities' compliance with the updated guidelines is highly recommended.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choledocholithiasis; Compliance; Complications; ERCP; Emergency; Guidelines; MRCP

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35277770     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09113-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  25 in total

1.  Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  E Masci; G Toti; A Mariani; S Curioni; A Lomazzi; M Dinelli; G Minoli; C Crosta; U Comin; A Fertitta; A Prada; G R Passoni; P A Testoni
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  The role of ERCP in benign diseases of the biliary tract.

Authors:  Krishnavel V Chathadi; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Ruben D Acosta; G Anton Decker; Dayna S Early; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; John A Evans; Ashley L Faulx; Robert D Fanelli; Deborah A Fisher; Kimberly Foley; Lisa Fonkalsrud; Joo Ha Hwang; Terry L Jue; Mouen A Khashab; Jenifer R Lightdale; V Raman Muthusamy; Shabana F Pasha; John R Saltzman; Ravi Sharaf; Aasma Shaukat; Amandeep K Shergill; Amy Wang; Brooks D Cash; John M DeWitt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Diagnostic accuracy of EUS compared with MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in head-to-head studies.

Authors:  Yaser Meeralam; Khalil Al-Shammari; Mohammad Yaghoobi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Su-Lim Lee; Hyung-Keun Kim; Hyun-Ho Choi; Bu-Seok Jeon; Tae-Hyung Kim; Jong-Min Choi; Young-Mi Ku; Sang-Woo Kim; Sung-Soo Kim; Hiun-Suk Chae
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.

Authors:  M L Freeman; D B Nelson; S Sherman; G B Haber; M E Herman; P J Dorsher; J P Moore; M B Fennerty; M E Ryan; M J Shaw; J D Lande; A M Pheley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.

Authors:  S Sherman; G A Lehman
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Prevalence and risk factors of gallstone disease in a high altitude Saudi population.

Authors:  S A Abu-Eshy; A A Mahfouz; A Badr; M N El Gamal; M Y Al-Shehri; M I Salati; M E Rabie
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.628

9.  Choledocholithiasis: overdiagnosed endoscopically and undertreated laparoscopically.

Authors:  Christine J O'Neill; Donna M Gillies; Jon S Gani
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 10.  Laparoscopic fundoplication surgery versus medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults.

Authors:  Sushil K Garg; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.