| Literature DB >> 27914116 |
Steven O Roberts1, Susan A Gelman1, Arnold K Ho1.
Abstract
When do descriptive regularities (what characteristics individuals have) become prescriptive norms (what characteristics individuals should have)? We examined children's (4-13 years) and adults' use of group regularities to make prescriptive judgments, employing novel groups (Hibbles and Glerks) that engaged in morally neutral behaviors (e.g., eating different kinds of berries). Participants were introduced to conforming or non-conforming individuals (e.g., a Hibble who ate berries more typical of a Glerk). Children negatively evaluated non-conformity, with negative evaluations declining with age (Study 1). These effects were replicable across competitive and cooperative intergroup contexts (Study 2) and stemmed from reasoning about group regularities rather than reasoning about individual regularities (Study 3). These data provide new insights into children's group concepts and have important implications for understanding the development of stereotyping and norm enforcement.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive development; Conformity; Group norms; Norm enforcement; Novel groups; Social cognition
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27914116 PMCID: PMC5395313 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Sci ISSN: 0364-0213