Literature DB >> 27913927

The number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with prognosis of stage IIIc-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Xia Xu1, Fei Deng2, Mengmeng Lv2, Xiaoxiang Chen3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: No consensus exists on the number of chemotherapy cycles to be administered before and after interval debulking surgery (IDS) in patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. The present study aims to explore the optimal number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and post-operation chemotherapy to treat the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIc-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 129 IIIc-IV stage HG-SOC cases were retrospectively analyzed. Cases were comprised of patients who underwent NAC followed by IDS and who achieved clinical complete response (CCR) at the end of primary therapy. Patients were recruited from the Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research between 1993 and 2013. Optimal IDS-associated factors were explored with logistic regression. The association between progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) duration, and covariates was assessed by Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank test.
RESULTS: The median number of NAC cycle was 3 (range 1-8). CA-125 decreasing kinetics (p = 0.01) was independently associated with optimal IDS. CA-125 decreasing kinetics, optimal IDS, and NAC cycles was independently associated with OS (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p = 0.03, respectively) and PFS (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p = 0.04, respectively). The PFS of patients who underwent ≥5 NAC cycles was shorter than those of patients who underwent <5 NAC cycles (12.3 versus 17.2 months). The PFS and OS of patients who underwent <5 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy post-IDS were shorter than those of patients who underwent ≥5 cycles (14.2 and 20.3 versus 21.2 and 28.8 months).
CONCLUSION: NAC cycles, CA-125 decreasing kinetics, and optimal debulking are independently associated with the prognosis of patients with advanced stage HG-SOC who underwent NAC/IDS and achieved CCR. The number of administered NAC cycles should not exceed 4.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA-125; Clinical complete response (CCR); High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC); Interval debulking surgery (IDS); Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27913927     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4256-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  9 in total

1.  Dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin vs. conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Takashi Shibutani; Shoji Nagao; Kazuhiro Suzuki; Michiko Kaneda; Kasumi Yamamoto; Tomoatsu Jimi; Hiroko Yano; Miho Kitai; Takaya Shiozaki; Kazuko Matsuoka; Tamotsu Sudo; Satoshi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Timing of surgery in patients with partial response or stable disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Nicole D Fleming; Bryan M Fellman; Larissa A Meyer; Anil K Sood; Karen H Lu; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction.

Authors:  Mackenzie Cummings; Olivia Nicolais; Mark Shahin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy cycles on survival of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Young Shin Chung; Yun-Ji Kim; Inha Lee; Jung-Yun Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Treatment strategies for patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: interval debulking surgery or additional chemotherapy?

Authors:  Yutaka Yoneoka; Mitsuya Ishikawa; Takashi Uehara; Hanako Shimizu; Masaya Uno; Takashi Murakami; Tomoyasu Kato
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  The added value of CA125 normalization before interval debulking surgery to the chemotherapy response score for the prognostication of ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease.

Authors:  Wei-Feng Liang; Li-Juan Wang; Hui Li; Chang-Hao Liu; Miao-Fang Wu; Jing Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 7.  Upfront debulking surgery for high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: current evidence.

Authors:  Orestis Tsonis; Fani Gkrozou; Konstantinos Vlachos; Minas Paschopoulos; Michail C Mitsis; Nikolaos Zakynthinakis-Kyriakou; Stergios Boussios; George Pappas-Gogos
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

8.  Effect of tumor burden and radical surgery on survival difference between upfront, early interval or delayed cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Martina Aida Angeles; Bastien Cabarrou; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Asunción Pérez-Benavente; Emanuela Spagnolo; Agnieszka Rychlik; Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Frédéric Guyon; Ignacio Zapardiel; Denis Querleu; Claire Illac; Federico Migliorelli; Sarah Bétrian; Gwénaël Ferron; Alicia Hernández; Alejandra Martinez
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 9.  Neoadjuvant treatment in ovarian cancer: New perspectives, new challenges.

Authors:  Adamantia Nikolaidi; Elena Fountzilas; Florentia Fostira; Amanda Psyrri; Helen Gogas; Christos Papadimitriou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.