Eva A Huis In 't Veld1, Francisco L Canales2, Heather J Furnas3. 1. Medical student, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 2. Plastic surgeon in private practice in Santa Rosa, CA, USA. 3. Adjunct Assistant Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Abstract
Background: In the patient-driven market of aesthetic surgery, an understanding of the factors that patients consider in their choice of surgeon can inform the individual plastic surgeon's marketing strategy. Previous studies have investigated patient gender preferences for physicians in other specialties, but none has investigated whether patients consider gender when choosing a plastic surgeon. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of a plastic surgeon's gender on patient choice. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a single private practice of two plastic surgeons, one male and one female, both closely matched in training, experience, and reputation. Two hundred consecutive patients calling for a consultation were asked if they preferred a male or female doctor; their preference, age, and area(s) of interest were recorded. Results: All patients were women. Nearly half (46%) had no gender preference, 26% requested a female surgeon, and 1% requested a male. Preference for a female surgeon was significant (Binomial-test: P < 0.001). The remaining 27% requested a specific doctor, with slightly more requesting (53.7%) the male surgeon by name, than requested the female surgeon by name (46.3%), a difference that was not statistically significant (P = 0.683). Conclusions: Most female patients interested in aesthetic surgery have no gender preference. Of those who do, nearly all requested a female plastic surgeon. More important than a plastic surgeon's gender, however, is a plastic surgeon's reputation.
Background: In the patient-driven market of aesthetic surgery, an understanding of the factors that patients consider in their choice of surgeon can inform the individual plastic surgeon's marketing strategy. Previous studies have investigated patient gender preferences for physicians in other specialties, but none has investigated whether patients consider gender when choosing a plastic surgeon. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of a plastic surgeon's gender on patient choice. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a single private practice of two plastic surgeons, one male and one female, both closely matched in training, experience, and reputation. Two hundred consecutive patients calling for a consultation were asked if they preferred a male or female doctor; their preference, age, and area(s) of interest were recorded. Results: All patients were women. Nearly half (46%) had no gender preference, 26% requested a female surgeon, and 1% requested a male. Preference for a female surgeon was significant (Binomial-test: P < 0.001). The remaining 27% requested a specific doctor, with slightly more requesting (53.7%) the male surgeon by name, than requested the female surgeon by name (46.3%), a difference that was not statistically significant (P = 0.683). Conclusions: Most female patients interested in aesthetic surgery have no gender preference. Of those who do, nearly all requested a female plastic surgeon. More important than a plastic surgeon's gender, however, is a plastic surgeon's reputation.
Authors: Hannah A Dineen; J Megan M Patterson; Scott M Eskildsen; Zoe S Gan; Quefeng Li; Brendan C Patterson; Reid W Draeger Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2019
Authors: Tanya P Hoke; Alexander A Berger; Christine C Pan; Lindsey A Jackson; William D Winkelman; Rachel High; Katherine A Volpe; Chee Paul Lin; Holly E Richter Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Jennifer K Plichta; Hannah Williamson; Amanda R Sergesketter; Lars J Grimm; Samantha M Thomas; Gayle DiLalla; Brittany A Zwischenberger; E Shelley Hwang; Ryan P Plichta Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Alexandra M Keane; Ellen L Larson; Katherine B Santosa; Bianca Vannucci; Jennifer F Waljee; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Susan E Mackinnon; Alison K Snyder-Warwick Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 5.169
Authors: Laura J Linscheid; Emma B Holliday; Awad Ahmed; Jeremy S Somerson; Summer Hanson; Reshma Jagsi; Curtiland Deville Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 3.240