Literature DB >> 27909888

Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors.

Stefan Dazert1, Jan Peter Thomas1, Andreas Büchner2, Joachim Müller3, John Martin Hempel3, Hubert Löwenheim4, Robert Mlynski5.   

Abstract

The RONDO is a single-unit cochlear implant audio processor, which omits the need for a behind-the-ear (BTE) audio processor. The primary aim was to compare speech perception results in quiet and in noise with the RONDO and the OPUS 2, a BTE audio processor. Secondary aims were to determine subjects' self-assessed levels of sound quality and gather subjective feedback on RONDO use. All speech perception tests were performed with the RONDO and the OPUS 2 behind-the-ear audio processor at 3 test intervals. Subjects were required to use the RONDO between test intervals. Subjects were tested at upgrade from the OPUS 2 to the RONDO and at 1 and 6 months after upgrade. Speech perception was determined using the Freiburg Monosyllables in quiet test and the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA) in noise. Subjective perception was determined using the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19), and a RONDO device-specific questionnaire. 50 subjects participated in the study. Neither speech perception scores nor self-perceived sound quality scores were significantly different at any interval between the RONDO and the OPUS 2. Subjects reported high levels of satisfaction with the RONDO. The RONDO provides comparable speech perception to the OPUS 2 while providing users with high levels of satisfaction and comfort without increasing health risk. The RONDO is a suitable and safe alternative to traditional BTE audio processors.

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; RONDO; Sound quality; Speech perception; Speech processor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909888     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4400-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Sound quality in adult cochlear implant recipients using the HISQUI19.

Authors:  Griet Mertens; Andrea Kleine Punte; Marc De Bodt; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Speech Intelligibility in Noise With a Single-Unit Cochlear Implant Audio Processor.

Authors:  Wilhelm Wimmer; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.

Authors:  Griet Mertens; Anouk Hofkens; Andrea Kleine Punte; Marc De Bodt; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Gaëtan Gilbert; Héloïse Carn; Stéphane Garnier; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Reply to Wimmer et al.'s comments concerning: 'off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors'.

Authors:  Robert Mlynski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comment on the paper by Dazert et al. entitled 'Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors'.

Authors:  Wilhelm Wimmer; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Insertion Guidance Based on Impedance Measurements of a Cochlear Electrode Array.

Authors:  Enver Salkim; Majid Zamani; Dai Jiang; Shakeel R Saeed; Andreas Demosthenous
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.387

Review 4.  Design and optimization of auditory prostheses using the finite element method: a narrative review.

Authors:  Qianli Cheng; Han Yu; Junpei Liu; Qi Zheng; Yanru Bai; Guangjian Ni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

5.  Long-Term Device Satisfaction and Safety after Cochlear Implantation in Children.

Authors:  Milan Urík; Soňa Šikolová; Dagmar Hošnová; Vít Kruntorád; Michal Bartoš; Petr Jabandžiev
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-18

6.  Psychometric properties of the English version of the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ).

Authors:  Jenna Felder; Edda Amann; Ilona Anderson; Joshua Stohl; Mareike Billinger-Finke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.